Dana G Rowe, Joshua Woo, Seeley Yoo, Jacqueline M Emerson, Ellen O'Callaghan, Michael Goodin, Kerri-Anne Crowell, Victoria Bradley, Jeremy Reynolds, Margaret O Johnson, Melissa M Erickson, C Rory Goodwin
{"title":"转移性脊柱疾病患者问题清单项目与临床显著困扰之间的关系","authors":"Dana G Rowe, Joshua Woo, Seeley Yoo, Jacqueline M Emerson, Ellen O'Callaghan, Michael Goodin, Kerri-Anne Crowell, Victoria Bradley, Jeremy Reynolds, Margaret O Johnson, Melissa M Erickson, C Rory Goodwin","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to identify sources of distress in patients with metastatic spine disease and elucidate factors associated with clinically significant distress.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Distress is associated with poorer outcomes and lower quality of life in cancer patients. Patients with metastatic spine disease are particularly vulnerable to clinically significant levels of distress. However, specific factors contributing to distress in these patients have been largely unexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with metastatic spine disease (MSD) who underwent surgery from 2015 to 2023. We analyzed National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer (DT) scores and Problem List items within 30 days prior to surgery, which was defined as \"baseline\" distress. We calculated the frequency of each problem and the proportion of patients with clinically significant distress (DT score ≥4). We used chi-square tests to analyze associations between Problem List items and significant distress, with a significance threshold of P<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 160 patients with MSD, 48.1% reported clinically significant distress. Patients most frequently reported Physical concerns (93.8%), followed by Emotional (55.6%) and Practical concerns (31.9%). The most common individual Problem List item was pain (72.5%), followed by fatigue (48.1%) and worry (41.2%). Emotional (P=0.001), Practical (P=0.04), and Social concerns (P=0.039) were significantly associated with clinically significant distress, but Physical concerns were not (P=0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Though physical concerns were most common for patients with MSD, emotional and practical concerns were more strongly associated with significant distress among patients with metastatic spine disease. These findings highlight the need for multidisciplinary care focused on emotional and practical issues to enhance patients' quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations Between Problem List Items and Clinically Significant Distress in Patients with Metastatic Spine Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Dana G Rowe, Joshua Woo, Seeley Yoo, Jacqueline M Emerson, Ellen O'Callaghan, Michael Goodin, Kerri-Anne Crowell, Victoria Bradley, Jeremy Reynolds, Margaret O Johnson, Melissa M Erickson, C Rory Goodwin\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005343\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to identify sources of distress in patients with metastatic spine disease and elucidate factors associated with clinically significant distress.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Distress is associated with poorer outcomes and lower quality of life in cancer patients. Patients with metastatic spine disease are particularly vulnerable to clinically significant levels of distress. However, specific factors contributing to distress in these patients have been largely unexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with metastatic spine disease (MSD) who underwent surgery from 2015 to 2023. We analyzed National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer (DT) scores and Problem List items within 30 days prior to surgery, which was defined as \\\"baseline\\\" distress. We calculated the frequency of each problem and the proportion of patients with clinically significant distress (DT score ≥4). We used chi-square tests to analyze associations between Problem List items and significant distress, with a significance threshold of P<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 160 patients with MSD, 48.1% reported clinically significant distress. Patients most frequently reported Physical concerns (93.8%), followed by Emotional (55.6%) and Practical concerns (31.9%). The most common individual Problem List item was pain (72.5%), followed by fatigue (48.1%) and worry (41.2%). Emotional (P=0.001), Practical (P=0.04), and Social concerns (P=0.039) were significantly associated with clinically significant distress, but Physical concerns were not (P=0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Though physical concerns were most common for patients with MSD, emotional and practical concerns were more strongly associated with significant distress among patients with metastatic spine disease. These findings highlight the need for multidisciplinary care focused on emotional and practical issues to enhance patients' quality of life.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005343\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005343","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Associations Between Problem List Items and Clinically Significant Distress in Patients with Metastatic Spine Disease.
Study design: Retrospective cohort study.
Objective: This study aimed to identify sources of distress in patients with metastatic spine disease and elucidate factors associated with clinically significant distress.
Summary of background data: Distress is associated with poorer outcomes and lower quality of life in cancer patients. Patients with metastatic spine disease are particularly vulnerable to clinically significant levels of distress. However, specific factors contributing to distress in these patients have been largely unexplored.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with metastatic spine disease (MSD) who underwent surgery from 2015 to 2023. We analyzed National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer (DT) scores and Problem List items within 30 days prior to surgery, which was defined as "baseline" distress. We calculated the frequency of each problem and the proportion of patients with clinically significant distress (DT score ≥4). We used chi-square tests to analyze associations between Problem List items and significant distress, with a significance threshold of P<0.05.
Results: Among 160 patients with MSD, 48.1% reported clinically significant distress. Patients most frequently reported Physical concerns (93.8%), followed by Emotional (55.6%) and Practical concerns (31.9%). The most common individual Problem List item was pain (72.5%), followed by fatigue (48.1%) and worry (41.2%). Emotional (P=0.001), Practical (P=0.04), and Social concerns (P=0.039) were significantly associated with clinically significant distress, but Physical concerns were not (P=0.05).
Conclusion: Though physical concerns were most common for patients with MSD, emotional and practical concerns were more strongly associated with significant distress among patients with metastatic spine disease. These findings highlight the need for multidisciplinary care focused on emotional and practical issues to enhance patients' quality of life.
期刊介绍：
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store.
Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
