Weibo Zhao, Lingyao Kong, Xuehui Wang, Qingyuan Liu, Yaqi Wang, Ji Wang
{"title":"基于2020年《中国药典》中成药治疗变应性鼻炎的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统评价和meta分析方案","authors":"Weibo Zhao, Lingyao Kong, Xuehui Wang, Qingyuan Liu, Yaqi Wang, Ji Wang","doi":"10.1186/s13643-024-02748-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Allergic Rhinitis (AR) is a prevalent chronic respiratory condition with limited long-term relief from Western medications. Interest in Traditional Chinese Patent Medicines (TCPMs) as a complementary approach is growing, but research on their efficacy and safety is lacking. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TCPMs listed in the 2020 Chinese Pharmacopoeia (ChP 2020) that are indicated for treating AR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We will search PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and four Chinese databases to retrieve randomized controlled trials investigating specific TCPMs (Biyankang tablets, Tongqiao Biyan Granules, Tongqiao Biyan Tablets, Tongqiao Biyan Capsules, Xinqin Granules, Xinqin Tablets, Xinyi Biyan Pills) for AR. Primary outcomes are Total Nasal Symptom Scores (TNSS) and Total Ocular Symptom Scores (TOSS). Secondary outcomes include quality of life, relapse rates, nasal function, biomarkers, and adverse events. No languages and publication data limitations. Meta-analysis will be performed using RevMan 5.4 with random effects model. Publication bias are set to be assessed using funnel plots and Egger's test, and adjusted with the trim and fill method. Meta-regression will investigate factors influencing outcomes for AR. Study quality will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach will be used to evaluate the quality of evidence.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Despite the limitations of conventional AR medications, TCPMs show potential benefits in immune modulation and symptom relief. This review will focus on TCPMs listed in ChP 2020 to comprehensively evaluate their safety and efficacy for AR. Unlike existing reviews, this study emphasizes rigorous standards of TCPMs, aiming to provide a more reliable evidence base. Although a network meta-analysis would be ideal, a traditional meta-analysis will be conducted due to limited data. Future research should focus on direct comparative studies and utilize AI techniques for understanding mechanisms and enhancing personalized treatments. This review aims to bridge gaps in the current literature and potentially improve clinical guidelines and patient outcomes in AR management.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>INPLASY202450121.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"69"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11934513/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of Chinese patent medicines for allergic rhinitis based on 2020 Chinese Pharmacopoeia: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Weibo Zhao, Lingyao Kong, Xuehui Wang, Qingyuan Liu, Yaqi Wang, Ji Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13643-024-02748-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Allergic Rhinitis (AR) is a prevalent chronic respiratory condition with limited long-term relief from Western medications. Interest in Traditional Chinese Patent Medicines (TCPMs) as a complementary approach is growing, but research on their efficacy and safety is lacking. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TCPMs listed in the 2020 Chinese Pharmacopoeia (ChP 2020) that are indicated for treating AR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We will search PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and four Chinese databases to retrieve randomized controlled trials investigating specific TCPMs (Biyankang tablets, Tongqiao Biyan Granules, Tongqiao Biyan Tablets, Tongqiao Biyan Capsules, Xinqin Granules, Xinqin Tablets, Xinyi Biyan Pills) for AR. Primary outcomes are Total Nasal Symptom Scores (TNSS) and Total Ocular Symptom Scores (TOSS). Secondary outcomes include quality of life, relapse rates, nasal function, biomarkers, and adverse events. No languages and publication data limitations. Meta-analysis will be performed using RevMan 5.4 with random effects model. Publication bias are set to be assessed using funnel plots and Egger's test, and adjusted with the trim and fill method. Meta-regression will investigate factors influencing outcomes for AR. Study quality will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach will be used to evaluate the quality of evidence.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Despite the limitations of conventional AR medications, TCPMs show potential benefits in immune modulation and symptom relief. This review will focus on TCPMs listed in ChP 2020 to comprehensively evaluate their safety and efficacy for AR. Unlike existing reviews, this study emphasizes rigorous standards of TCPMs, aiming to provide a more reliable evidence base. Although a network meta-analysis would be ideal, a traditional meta-analysis will be conducted due to limited data. Future research should focus on direct comparative studies and utilize AI techniques for understanding mechanisms and enhancing personalized treatments. This review aims to bridge gaps in the current literature and potentially improve clinical guidelines and patient outcomes in AR management.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>INPLASY202450121.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11934513/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02748-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02748-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:变应性鼻炎(AR)是一种常见的慢性呼吸系统疾病,西药长期缓解有限。人们对中成药作为一种补充方法的兴趣越来越大,但对其疗效和安全性的研究却很缺乏。目的:评价2020年中国药典(chp2020)中所列中药用于治疗急性鼻炎的疗效和安全性。我们将检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane Library和四个中文数据库,检索研究特定中药(鼻炎康片、通桥鼻炎颗粒、通桥鼻炎片、通桥鼻炎胶囊、心芩颗粒、心芩片、心一鼻炎丸)治疗AR的随机对照试验。主要结果为鼻症状总评分(TNSS)和眼症状总评分(TOSS)。次要结局包括生活质量、复发率、鼻功能、生物标志物和不良事件。无语言和出版资料限制。meta分析采用RevMan 5.4,采用随机效应模型。采用漏斗图和Egger’s检验评估发表偏倚,并采用修剪填充法进行调整。meta回归将调查影响AR结果的因素。研究质量将使用Cochrane风险偏倚2.0工具进行评估,并使用分级推荐评估、发展和评估方法来评估证据质量。讨论:尽管传统AR药物存在局限性,但TCPMs在免疫调节和症状缓解方面显示出潜在的益处。本综述将以ChP 2020中所列中药为重点,全面评价其用于AR的安全性和有效性。与现有综述不同,本研究强调中药的严格标准,旨在提供更可靠的证据基础。虽然网络元分析是理想的,但由于数据有限,将进行传统的元分析。未来的研究应侧重于直接比较研究,并利用人工智能技术来了解机制和加强个性化治疗。本综述旨在弥补当前文献中的空白,并有可能改善AR管理的临床指南和患者预后。系统评审注册:INPLASY202450121。
Efficacy and safety of Chinese patent medicines for allergic rhinitis based on 2020 Chinese Pharmacopoeia: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Background: Allergic Rhinitis (AR) is a prevalent chronic respiratory condition with limited long-term relief from Western medications. Interest in Traditional Chinese Patent Medicines (TCPMs) as a complementary approach is growing, but research on their efficacy and safety is lacking. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TCPMs listed in the 2020 Chinese Pharmacopoeia (ChP 2020) that are indicated for treating AR.
Methods: We will search PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and four Chinese databases to retrieve randomized controlled trials investigating specific TCPMs (Biyankang tablets, Tongqiao Biyan Granules, Tongqiao Biyan Tablets, Tongqiao Biyan Capsules, Xinqin Granules, Xinqin Tablets, Xinyi Biyan Pills) for AR. Primary outcomes are Total Nasal Symptom Scores (TNSS) and Total Ocular Symptom Scores (TOSS). Secondary outcomes include quality of life, relapse rates, nasal function, biomarkers, and adverse events. No languages and publication data limitations. Meta-analysis will be performed using RevMan 5.4 with random effects model. Publication bias are set to be assessed using funnel plots and Egger's test, and adjusted with the trim and fill method. Meta-regression will investigate factors influencing outcomes for AR. Study quality will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach will be used to evaluate the quality of evidence.
Discussion: Despite the limitations of conventional AR medications, TCPMs show potential benefits in immune modulation and symptom relief. This review will focus on TCPMs listed in ChP 2020 to comprehensively evaluate their safety and efficacy for AR. Unlike existing reviews, this study emphasizes rigorous standards of TCPMs, aiming to provide a more reliable evidence base. Although a network meta-analysis would be ideal, a traditional meta-analysis will be conducted due to limited data. Future research should focus on direct comparative studies and utilize AI techniques for understanding mechanisms and enhancing personalized treatments. This review aims to bridge gaps in the current literature and potentially improve clinical guidelines and patient outcomes in AR management.
期刊介绍:
Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.