可预见性中的习惯化——刺激-反应结合的调节。

IF 2.3 Q1 Psychology
Journal of Cognition Pub Date : 2025-03-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5334/joc.438
Philip Schmalbrock, Jan Theeuwes, Christian Frings
{"title":"可预见性中的习惯化——刺激-反应结合的调节。","authors":"Philip Schmalbrock, Jan Theeuwes, Christian Frings","doi":"10.5334/joc.438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acting intentionally requires the integration of perceptual with action information in a common representational format. In the action control literature, this integrated representation is often called event file and is measured in so-called stimulus-response binding effects. These effects allow us to measure the strength of this shared representation and the impact it can have on behavior. A well-established finding is that particular variables can modulate the size of binding effects - one recently discovered modulator is <i>stimulus predictability</i>: If perceptual information is perfectly predictable, stimulus-response binding effects diminish. Yet, the concrete mechanism of why predictability diminishes stimulus-response binding effects remained elusive so far. In the present study (<i>N</i> = 234), we compared two possible explanations for these modulation effects, namely habituation versus statistical learning. We found that it is unlikely that the predictability modulation is explained by habituation. Instead, we found evidence that is more in line with (but not exclusive to) learning of statistical regularities as an explanation. Our study thus adds to recent attempts to more closely relate learning mechanisms and action control.</p>","PeriodicalId":32728,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognition","volume":"8 1","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931097/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Habituation in Predictability-Modulations of Stimulus-Response Binding.\",\"authors\":\"Philip Schmalbrock, Jan Theeuwes, Christian Frings\",\"doi\":\"10.5334/joc.438\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Acting intentionally requires the integration of perceptual with action information in a common representational format. In the action control literature, this integrated representation is often called event file and is measured in so-called stimulus-response binding effects. These effects allow us to measure the strength of this shared representation and the impact it can have on behavior. A well-established finding is that particular variables can modulate the size of binding effects - one recently discovered modulator is <i>stimulus predictability</i>: If perceptual information is perfectly predictable, stimulus-response binding effects diminish. Yet, the concrete mechanism of why predictability diminishes stimulus-response binding effects remained elusive so far. In the present study (<i>N</i> = 234), we compared two possible explanations for these modulation effects, namely habituation versus statistical learning. We found that it is unlikely that the predictability modulation is explained by habituation. Instead, we found evidence that is more in line with (but not exclusive to) learning of statistical regularities as an explanation. Our study thus adds to recent attempts to more closely relate learning mechanisms and action control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cognition\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931097/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.438\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有意识的行动需要将知觉信息和行动信息以一种共同的表征形式整合起来。在动作控制文献中,这种综合表征通常被称为事件文件,并以所谓的刺激-反应结合效应来衡量。这些效应使我们能够衡量这种共同表征的强度及其对行为的影响。一个公认的发现是,特定的变量可以调节绑定效应的大小——最近发现的一个调节器是刺激的可预测性:如果感知信息是完全可预测的,刺激-反应绑定效应就会减弱。然而,为什么可预测性会减少刺激-反应结合效应的具体机制迄今仍难以捉摸。在本研究中(N = 234),我们比较了这些调节效应的两种可能的解释,即习惯化和统计学习。我们发现,这种可预见性调节不太可能用习惯化来解释。相反,我们发现的证据更符合(但不排除)统计规律的学习作为一种解释。因此,我们的研究增加了最近更密切地联系学习机制和行动控制的尝试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Habituation in Predictability-Modulations of Stimulus-Response Binding.

Habituation in Predictability-Modulations of Stimulus-Response Binding.

Habituation in Predictability-Modulations of Stimulus-Response Binding.

Habituation in Predictability-Modulations of Stimulus-Response Binding.

Acting intentionally requires the integration of perceptual with action information in a common representational format. In the action control literature, this integrated representation is often called event file and is measured in so-called stimulus-response binding effects. These effects allow us to measure the strength of this shared representation and the impact it can have on behavior. A well-established finding is that particular variables can modulate the size of binding effects - one recently discovered modulator is stimulus predictability: If perceptual information is perfectly predictable, stimulus-response binding effects diminish. Yet, the concrete mechanism of why predictability diminishes stimulus-response binding effects remained elusive so far. In the present study (N = 234), we compared two possible explanations for these modulation effects, namely habituation versus statistical learning. We found that it is unlikely that the predictability modulation is explained by habituation. Instead, we found evidence that is more in line with (but not exclusive to) learning of statistical regularities as an explanation. Our study thus adds to recent attempts to more closely relate learning mechanisms and action control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cognition
Journal of Cognition Psychology-Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信