{"title":"日本版ICECAP-A的评分系统。","authors":"Mitsuhiro Sado, Kengo Nagashima, Akihiro Koreki","doi":"10.2147/PRBM.S480328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to develop a value set for the Japanese version of the Investigating Choice Experiments CAPability Measure for Adults (ICECAP-A).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A total of 400 participants were recruited. Survey 1, conducted utilizing a self-report format, collected demographic data and responses to well-being scales, including the ICECAP-A, the Investigating Choice Experiments CAPability Measure for Older People (ICECAP-O), and the EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), among others. Participants who completed Survey 1 were invited to participate in Survey 2. In Survey 2, an interview-based assessment, participants engaged in best-worst scaling, where they identified the most and least favorable situations in each of the 16 hypothetical scenarios. A mixed-mixed multinomial logit (MM-MNL) model was utilized to estimate preference parameters, accounting for individual heterogeneity and latent classes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The estimated parameters and tariffs indicated that all five attributes contributed to an individual's capability for well-being, consistent with prior studies. The attributes were ranked in order of importance as follows: \"enjoyment\" (24.8% of the space), \"attachment\" (22.1%), \"stability\" (19.5%), \"autonomy\" (17.9%), and \"achievement\" (15.6%). For \"enjoyment\" and \"attachment\", the differences between levels 1 and 2 and between levels 2 and 3 were equally large. In contrast, for all other attributes, the greatest differences were observed between levels 1 and 2. Across all attributes, the differences between levels 3 and 4 were comparatively smaller.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We developed a Japanese version of the ICECAP-A and demonstrated the feasibility of utilizing best-worst scaling in a non-European context. This approach allows for a more precise evaluation of quality of life (QoL) among individuals with chronic conditions, caregivers, and the general population. Future research should assess the scale's sensitivity in capturing changes in capability over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":20954,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Research and Behavior Management","volume":"18 ","pages":"703-717"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932030/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scoring System for the Japanese Version of the ICECAP-A.\",\"authors\":\"Mitsuhiro Sado, Kengo Nagashima, Akihiro Koreki\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/PRBM.S480328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to develop a value set for the Japanese version of the Investigating Choice Experiments CAPability Measure for Adults (ICECAP-A).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A total of 400 participants were recruited. Survey 1, conducted utilizing a self-report format, collected demographic data and responses to well-being scales, including the ICECAP-A, the Investigating Choice Experiments CAPability Measure for Older People (ICECAP-O), and the EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), among others. Participants who completed Survey 1 were invited to participate in Survey 2. In Survey 2, an interview-based assessment, participants engaged in best-worst scaling, where they identified the most and least favorable situations in each of the 16 hypothetical scenarios. A mixed-mixed multinomial logit (MM-MNL) model was utilized to estimate preference parameters, accounting for individual heterogeneity and latent classes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The estimated parameters and tariffs indicated that all five attributes contributed to an individual's capability for well-being, consistent with prior studies. The attributes were ranked in order of importance as follows: \\\"enjoyment\\\" (24.8% of the space), \\\"attachment\\\" (22.1%), \\\"stability\\\" (19.5%), \\\"autonomy\\\" (17.9%), and \\\"achievement\\\" (15.6%). For \\\"enjoyment\\\" and \\\"attachment\\\", the differences between levels 1 and 2 and between levels 2 and 3 were equally large. In contrast, for all other attributes, the greatest differences were observed between levels 1 and 2. Across all attributes, the differences between levels 3 and 4 were comparatively smaller.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We developed a Japanese version of the ICECAP-A and demonstrated the feasibility of utilizing best-worst scaling in a non-European context. This approach allows for a more precise evaluation of quality of life (QoL) among individuals with chronic conditions, caregivers, and the general population. Future research should assess the scale's sensitivity in capturing changes in capability over time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology Research and Behavior Management\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"703-717\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932030/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology Research and Behavior Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S480328\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Research and Behavior Management","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S480328","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Scoring System for the Japanese Version of the ICECAP-A.
Purpose: This study aimed to develop a value set for the Japanese version of the Investigating Choice Experiments CAPability Measure for Adults (ICECAP-A).
Patients and methods: A total of 400 participants were recruited. Survey 1, conducted utilizing a self-report format, collected demographic data and responses to well-being scales, including the ICECAP-A, the Investigating Choice Experiments CAPability Measure for Older People (ICECAP-O), and the EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), among others. Participants who completed Survey 1 were invited to participate in Survey 2. In Survey 2, an interview-based assessment, participants engaged in best-worst scaling, where they identified the most and least favorable situations in each of the 16 hypothetical scenarios. A mixed-mixed multinomial logit (MM-MNL) model was utilized to estimate preference parameters, accounting for individual heterogeneity and latent classes.
Results: The estimated parameters and tariffs indicated that all five attributes contributed to an individual's capability for well-being, consistent with prior studies. The attributes were ranked in order of importance as follows: "enjoyment" (24.8% of the space), "attachment" (22.1%), "stability" (19.5%), "autonomy" (17.9%), and "achievement" (15.6%). For "enjoyment" and "attachment", the differences between levels 1 and 2 and between levels 2 and 3 were equally large. In contrast, for all other attributes, the greatest differences were observed between levels 1 and 2. Across all attributes, the differences between levels 3 and 4 were comparatively smaller.
Conclusion: We developed a Japanese version of the ICECAP-A and demonstrated the feasibility of utilizing best-worst scaling in a non-European context. This approach allows for a more precise evaluation of quality of life (QoL) among individuals with chronic conditions, caregivers, and the general population. Future research should assess the scale's sensitivity in capturing changes in capability over time.
期刊介绍：
Psychology Research and Behavior Management is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on the science of psychology and its application in behavior management to develop improved outcomes in the clinical, educational, sports and business arenas. Specific topics covered in the journal include: -Neuroscience, memory and decision making -Behavior modification and management -Clinical applications -Business and sports performance management -Social and developmental studies -Animal studies The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical studies, surveys, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, case reports and extended reports.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
