{"title":"MARPE 可提高青少年上颌骨扩张的长期稳定性。","authors":"Ezgi Cansu Firinciogullari, Aslihan Ertan Erdinc, Tugce Celenk-Koca, David Cruz Walma, Sercan Akyalcin","doi":"10.1111/ocr.12922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective (s): </strong>To evaluate and compare the long-term skeletal and dentoalveolar outcomes of conventional rapid palatal expansion (RPE) and mini-screw-assisted RPE (MARPE) in adolescent patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fourteen patients were recruited from a cohort of patients previously treated with RPE or MARPE appliances with a history of > 10 years post-treatment. Of the initial larger sample population, these 14 patients agreed to return for a follow-up appointment. For the study purposes, the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images acquired at pre-treatment (T0), after maxillary expansion and 6 months of retention (T1), and 10-year post-treatment follow-up period (T2) were utilized. The study variables obtained from the CBCT images comprised skeletal width, palatal suture assessment, buccal and palatal bone thickness, dental tipping, and alveolar bone bending measurements. Statistical comparisons were performed using Mann-Whitney U tests. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05 for all tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MARPE resulted in more stable skeletal expansion and fewer dental side effects compared to RPE treatment. Patients treated with RPE exhibited an 80% relapse in buccal maxillary width at the premolar after 10 years, compared to a 30% relapse among those treated with MARPE. Several additional parameters showed enhanced relapse in the RPE group compared to the MARPE group, suggesting MARPE treatment results in improved long-term dentoskeletal stability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment with MARPE resulted in more stable long-term skeletal expansion and fewer dental side effects compared to conventional RPE 10 years after the completion of orthodontic treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19652,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MARPE Improves Long-Term Stability of Maxillary Expansion in Adolescents.\",\"authors\":\"Ezgi Cansu Firinciogullari, Aslihan Ertan Erdinc, Tugce Celenk-Koca, David Cruz Walma, Sercan Akyalcin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ocr.12922\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective (s): </strong>To evaluate and compare the long-term skeletal and dentoalveolar outcomes of conventional rapid palatal expansion (RPE) and mini-screw-assisted RPE (MARPE) in adolescent patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fourteen patients were recruited from a cohort of patients previously treated with RPE or MARPE appliances with a history of > 10 years post-treatment. Of the initial larger sample population, these 14 patients agreed to return for a follow-up appointment. For the study purposes, the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images acquired at pre-treatment (T0), after maxillary expansion and 6 months of retention (T1), and 10-year post-treatment follow-up period (T2) were utilized. The study variables obtained from the CBCT images comprised skeletal width, palatal suture assessment, buccal and palatal bone thickness, dental tipping, and alveolar bone bending measurements. Statistical comparisons were performed using Mann-Whitney U tests. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05 for all tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MARPE resulted in more stable skeletal expansion and fewer dental side effects compared to RPE treatment. Patients treated with RPE exhibited an 80% relapse in buccal maxillary width at the premolar after 10 years, compared to a 30% relapse among those treated with MARPE. Several additional parameters showed enhanced relapse in the RPE group compared to the MARPE group, suggesting MARPE treatment results in improved long-term dentoskeletal stability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment with MARPE resulted in more stable long-term skeletal expansion and fewer dental side effects compared to conventional RPE 10 years after the completion of orthodontic treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12922\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12922","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
MARPE Improves Long-Term Stability of Maxillary Expansion in Adolescents.
Objective (s): To evaluate and compare the long-term skeletal and dentoalveolar outcomes of conventional rapid palatal expansion (RPE) and mini-screw-assisted RPE (MARPE) in adolescent patients.
Materials and methods: Fourteen patients were recruited from a cohort of patients previously treated with RPE or MARPE appliances with a history of > 10 years post-treatment. Of the initial larger sample population, these 14 patients agreed to return for a follow-up appointment. For the study purposes, the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images acquired at pre-treatment (T0), after maxillary expansion and 6 months of retention (T1), and 10-year post-treatment follow-up period (T2) were utilized. The study variables obtained from the CBCT images comprised skeletal width, palatal suture assessment, buccal and palatal bone thickness, dental tipping, and alveolar bone bending measurements. Statistical comparisons were performed using Mann-Whitney U tests. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05 for all tests.
Results: MARPE resulted in more stable skeletal expansion and fewer dental side effects compared to RPE treatment. Patients treated with RPE exhibited an 80% relapse in buccal maxillary width at the premolar after 10 years, compared to a 30% relapse among those treated with MARPE. Several additional parameters showed enhanced relapse in the RPE group compared to the MARPE group, suggesting MARPE treatment results in improved long-term dentoskeletal stability.
Conclusion: Treatment with MARPE resulted in more stable long-term skeletal expansion and fewer dental side effects compared to conventional RPE 10 years after the completion of orthodontic treatment.
期刊介绍:
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research - Genes, Growth and Development is published to serve its readers as an international forum for the presentation and critical discussion of issues pertinent to the advancement of the specialty of orthodontics and the evidence-based knowledge of craniofacial growth and development. This forum is based on scientifically supported information, but also includes minority and conflicting opinions.
The objective of the journal is to facilitate effective communication between the research community and practicing clinicians. Original papers of high scientific quality that report the findings of clinical trials, clinical epidemiology, and novel therapeutic or diagnostic approaches are appropriate submissions. Similarly, we welcome papers in genetics, developmental biology, syndromology, surgery, speech and hearing, and other biomedical disciplines related to clinical orthodontics and normal and abnormal craniofacial growth and development. In addition to original and basic research, the journal publishes concise reviews, case reports of substantial value, invited essays, letters, and announcements.
The journal is published quarterly. The review of submitted papers will be coordinated by the editor and members of the editorial board. It is policy to review manuscripts within 3 to 4 weeks of receipt and to publish within 3 to 6 months of acceptance.