Jakub Gajdecki, Bartosz Stępień, Kinga Gajdecka, Olga Brzezińska, Aleksandra Nadel, Joanna Makowska, Aleksandra Opinc-Rosiak
{"title":"控制营养状况评分作为系统性硬化症营养不良筛查的敏感工具——一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Jakub Gajdecki, Bartosz Stępień, Kinga Gajdecka, Olga Brzezińska, Aleksandra Nadel, Joanna Makowska, Aleksandra Opinc-Rosiak","doi":"10.1007/s00296-025-05830-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the high prevalence of malnutrition in Systemic Sclerosis (SSc), it often remains overlooked in daily routine. The study aimed to assess the nutritional status of SSc patients using two different tools, concerning their clinical presentation and laboratory results. This retrospective study included 44 SSc patients. We assessed malnutrition with the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) and the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score. Systemic involvement and laboratory parameters were analysed. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA Kruscal-Wallis with post-hoc tests for continuous variables and Chi2 tests for dichotomous variables. The CONUT revealed a substantial proportion of malnourished patients (n = 27; 61,4%), which was higher compared to the assessment with MUST (n = 14; 34,1%). CONUT-undernourished patients had higher C-reactive-protein (28,84 ± 31,72 versus 2,91 ± 2,18, p = 0,0126), higher red-cell-distribution-width (moderate-16,46 ± 2,52 versus normal-13,90 ± 1,03, p = 0,0150), lower hemoglobin (moderate-11,45 ± 2,28 versus normal-13,49 ± 1,28, p = 0,0426), higher N-terminal pro-B-type-natriuretic-peptide (moderate-3790,53 ± 6810,00 versus normal-193,87 ± 265,16, p = 0,0406). However, these observations were not confirmed for MUST-assessed malnutrition. The prevalence of malnutrition in our study was similar to other described cohorts. The CONUT score appeared to be a more sensitive screening tool for malnutrition, however, in patients with cardiological involvement, it may give false-positive results. This study is the first to evaluate SSc patients with the CONUT score, highlighting the need for further research to assess its effectiveness thoroughly.</p>","PeriodicalId":21322,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology International","volume":"45 4","pages":"80"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Controlling nutritional status score as a sensitive instrument for malnutrition screening in systemic sclerosis - a retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Jakub Gajdecki, Bartosz Stępień, Kinga Gajdecka, Olga Brzezińska, Aleksandra Nadel, Joanna Makowska, Aleksandra Opinc-Rosiak\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00296-025-05830-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite the high prevalence of malnutrition in Systemic Sclerosis (SSc), it often remains overlooked in daily routine. The study aimed to assess the nutritional status of SSc patients using two different tools, concerning their clinical presentation and laboratory results. This retrospective study included 44 SSc patients. We assessed malnutrition with the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) and the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score. Systemic involvement and laboratory parameters were analysed. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA Kruscal-Wallis with post-hoc tests for continuous variables and Chi2 tests for dichotomous variables. The CONUT revealed a substantial proportion of malnourished patients (n = 27; 61,4%), which was higher compared to the assessment with MUST (n = 14; 34,1%). CONUT-undernourished patients had higher C-reactive-protein (28,84 ± 31,72 versus 2,91 ± 2,18, p = 0,0126), higher red-cell-distribution-width (moderate-16,46 ± 2,52 versus normal-13,90 ± 1,03, p = 0,0150), lower hemoglobin (moderate-11,45 ± 2,28 versus normal-13,49 ± 1,28, p = 0,0426), higher N-terminal pro-B-type-natriuretic-peptide (moderate-3790,53 ± 6810,00 versus normal-193,87 ± 265,16, p = 0,0406). However, these observations were not confirmed for MUST-assessed malnutrition. The prevalence of malnutrition in our study was similar to other described cohorts. The CONUT score appeared to be a more sensitive screening tool for malnutrition, however, in patients with cardiological involvement, it may give false-positive results. This study is the first to evaluate SSc patients with the CONUT score, highlighting the need for further research to assess its effectiveness thoroughly.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rheumatology International\",\"volume\":\"45 4\",\"pages\":\"80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rheumatology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-025-05830-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-025-05830-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Controlling nutritional status score as a sensitive instrument for malnutrition screening in systemic sclerosis - a retrospective study.
Despite the high prevalence of malnutrition in Systemic Sclerosis (SSc), it often remains overlooked in daily routine. The study aimed to assess the nutritional status of SSc patients using two different tools, concerning their clinical presentation and laboratory results. This retrospective study included 44 SSc patients. We assessed malnutrition with the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) and the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score. Systemic involvement and laboratory parameters were analysed. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA Kruscal-Wallis with post-hoc tests for continuous variables and Chi2 tests for dichotomous variables. The CONUT revealed a substantial proportion of malnourished patients (n = 27; 61,4%), which was higher compared to the assessment with MUST (n = 14; 34,1%). CONUT-undernourished patients had higher C-reactive-protein (28,84 ± 31,72 versus 2,91 ± 2,18, p = 0,0126), higher red-cell-distribution-width (moderate-16,46 ± 2,52 versus normal-13,90 ± 1,03, p = 0,0150), lower hemoglobin (moderate-11,45 ± 2,28 versus normal-13,49 ± 1,28, p = 0,0426), higher N-terminal pro-B-type-natriuretic-peptide (moderate-3790,53 ± 6810,00 versus normal-193,87 ± 265,16, p = 0,0406). However, these observations were not confirmed for MUST-assessed malnutrition. The prevalence of malnutrition in our study was similar to other described cohorts. The CONUT score appeared to be a more sensitive screening tool for malnutrition, however, in patients with cardiological involvement, it may give false-positive results. This study is the first to evaluate SSc patients with the CONUT score, highlighting the need for further research to assess its effectiveness thoroughly.
期刊介绍:
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL is an independent journal reflecting world-wide progress in the research, diagnosis and treatment of the various rheumatic diseases. It is designed to serve researchers and clinicians in the field of rheumatology.
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL will cover all modern trends in clinical research as well as in the management of rheumatic diseases. Special emphasis will be given to public health issues related to rheumatic diseases, applying rheumatology research to clinical practice, epidemiology of rheumatic diseases, diagnostic tests for rheumatic diseases, patient reported outcomes (PROs) in rheumatology and evidence on education of rheumatology. Contributions to these topics will appear in the form of original publications, short communications, editorials, and reviews. "Letters to the editor" will be welcome as an enhancement to discussion. Basic science research, including in vitro or animal studies, is discouraged to submit, as we will only review studies on humans with an epidemological or clinical perspective. Case reports without a proper review of the literatura (Case-based Reviews) will not be published. Every effort will be made to ensure speed of publication while maintaining a high standard of contents and production.
Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.