控制营养状况评分作为系统性硬化症营养不良筛查的敏感工具——一项回顾性研究。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Jakub Gajdecki, Bartosz Stępień, Kinga Gajdecka, Olga Brzezińska, Aleksandra Nadel, Joanna Makowska, Aleksandra Opinc-Rosiak
{"title":"控制营养状况评分作为系统性硬化症营养不良筛查的敏感工具——一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Jakub Gajdecki, Bartosz Stępień, Kinga Gajdecka, Olga Brzezińska, Aleksandra Nadel, Joanna Makowska, Aleksandra Opinc-Rosiak","doi":"10.1007/s00296-025-05830-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the high prevalence of malnutrition in Systemic Sclerosis (SSc), it often remains overlooked in daily routine. The study aimed to assess the nutritional status of SSc patients using two different tools, concerning their clinical presentation and laboratory results. This retrospective study included 44 SSc patients. We assessed malnutrition with the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) and the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score. Systemic involvement and laboratory parameters were analysed. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA Kruscal-Wallis with post-hoc tests for continuous variables and Chi2 tests for dichotomous variables. The CONUT revealed a substantial proportion of malnourished patients (n = 27; 61,4%), which was higher compared to the assessment with MUST (n = 14; 34,1%). CONUT-undernourished patients had higher C-reactive-protein (28,84 ± 31,72 versus 2,91 ± 2,18, p = 0,0126), higher red-cell-distribution-width (moderate-16,46 ± 2,52 versus normal-13,90 ± 1,03, p = 0,0150), lower hemoglobin (moderate-11,45 ± 2,28 versus normal-13,49 ± 1,28, p = 0,0426), higher N-terminal pro-B-type-natriuretic-peptide (moderate-3790,53 ± 6810,00 versus normal-193,87 ± 265,16, p = 0,0406). However, these observations were not confirmed for MUST-assessed malnutrition. The prevalence of malnutrition in our study was similar to other described cohorts. The CONUT score appeared to be a more sensitive screening tool for malnutrition, however, in patients with cardiological involvement, it may give false-positive results. This study is the first to evaluate SSc patients with the CONUT score, highlighting the need for further research to assess its effectiveness thoroughly.</p>","PeriodicalId":21322,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology International","volume":"45 4","pages":"80"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Controlling nutritional status score as a sensitive instrument for malnutrition screening in systemic sclerosis - a retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Jakub Gajdecki, Bartosz Stępień, Kinga Gajdecka, Olga Brzezińska, Aleksandra Nadel, Joanna Makowska, Aleksandra Opinc-Rosiak\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00296-025-05830-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite the high prevalence of malnutrition in Systemic Sclerosis (SSc), it often remains overlooked in daily routine. The study aimed to assess the nutritional status of SSc patients using two different tools, concerning their clinical presentation and laboratory results. This retrospective study included 44 SSc patients. We assessed malnutrition with the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) and the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score. Systemic involvement and laboratory parameters were analysed. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA Kruscal-Wallis with post-hoc tests for continuous variables and Chi2 tests for dichotomous variables. The CONUT revealed a substantial proportion of malnourished patients (n = 27; 61,4%), which was higher compared to the assessment with MUST (n = 14; 34,1%). CONUT-undernourished patients had higher C-reactive-protein (28,84 ± 31,72 versus 2,91 ± 2,18, p = 0,0126), higher red-cell-distribution-width (moderate-16,46 ± 2,52 versus normal-13,90 ± 1,03, p = 0,0150), lower hemoglobin (moderate-11,45 ± 2,28 versus normal-13,49 ± 1,28, p = 0,0426), higher N-terminal pro-B-type-natriuretic-peptide (moderate-3790,53 ± 6810,00 versus normal-193,87 ± 265,16, p = 0,0406). However, these observations were not confirmed for MUST-assessed malnutrition. The prevalence of malnutrition in our study was similar to other described cohorts. The CONUT score appeared to be a more sensitive screening tool for malnutrition, however, in patients with cardiological involvement, it may give false-positive results. This study is the first to evaluate SSc patients with the CONUT score, highlighting the need for further research to assess its effectiveness thoroughly.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rheumatology International\",\"volume\":\"45 4\",\"pages\":\"80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rheumatology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-025-05830-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-025-05830-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管营养不良在系统性硬化症(SSc)中非常普遍,但在日常生活中却经常被忽视。该研究旨在使用两种不同的工具评估SSc患者的营养状况,包括他们的临床表现和实验室结果。本回顾性研究包括44例SSc患者。我们用营养不良普遍筛查工具(MUST)和控制营养状况(CONUT)评分来评估营养不良。系统参与和实验室参数分析。统计分析采用Kruscal-Wallis方差分析,连续变量采用事后检验,二分变量采用Chi2检验。CONUT显示了相当比例的营养不良患者(n = 27;61.4%),高于MUST评估(n = 14;34岁的1%)。conut营养不良患者c-反应蛋白升高(28,84±31,72比2,91±2,18,p = 0,0126),红细胞分布宽度升高(中度-16,46±2,52比正常-13,90±1,03,p = 0,0150),血红蛋白降低(中度-11,45±2,28比正常-13,49±1,28,p = 0,0426), n-末端前b型尿钠肽升高(中度-3790,53±6810,00比正常-193,87±265,16,p = 0,0406)。然而,这些观察结果并未在must评估的营养不良中得到证实。在我们的研究中,营养不良的患病率与其他描述的队列相似。CONUT评分似乎是一种更敏感的营养不良筛查工具,然而,在患有心脏病的患者中,它可能会产生假阳性结果。本研究首次使用CONUT评分对SSc患者进行评估,强调了进一步研究以彻底评估其有效性的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Controlling nutritional status score as a sensitive instrument for malnutrition screening in systemic sclerosis - a retrospective study.

Despite the high prevalence of malnutrition in Systemic Sclerosis (SSc), it often remains overlooked in daily routine. The study aimed to assess the nutritional status of SSc patients using two different tools, concerning their clinical presentation and laboratory results. This retrospective study included 44 SSc patients. We assessed malnutrition with the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) and the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score. Systemic involvement and laboratory parameters were analysed. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA Kruscal-Wallis with post-hoc tests for continuous variables and Chi2 tests for dichotomous variables. The CONUT revealed a substantial proportion of malnourished patients (n = 27; 61,4%), which was higher compared to the assessment with MUST (n = 14; 34,1%). CONUT-undernourished patients had higher C-reactive-protein (28,84 ± 31,72 versus 2,91 ± 2,18, p = 0,0126), higher red-cell-distribution-width (moderate-16,46 ± 2,52 versus normal-13,90 ± 1,03, p = 0,0150), lower hemoglobin (moderate-11,45 ± 2,28 versus normal-13,49 ± 1,28, p = 0,0426), higher N-terminal pro-B-type-natriuretic-peptide (moderate-3790,53 ± 6810,00 versus normal-193,87 ± 265,16, p = 0,0406). However, these observations were not confirmed for MUST-assessed malnutrition. The prevalence of malnutrition in our study was similar to other described cohorts. The CONUT score appeared to be a more sensitive screening tool for malnutrition, however, in patients with cardiological involvement, it may give false-positive results. This study is the first to evaluate SSc patients with the CONUT score, highlighting the need for further research to assess its effectiveness thoroughly.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rheumatology International
Rheumatology International 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
191
审稿时长
16. months
期刊介绍: RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL is an independent journal reflecting world-wide progress in the research, diagnosis and treatment of the various rheumatic diseases. It is designed to serve researchers and clinicians in the field of rheumatology. RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL will cover all modern trends in clinical research as well as in the management of rheumatic diseases. Special emphasis will be given to public health issues related to rheumatic diseases, applying rheumatology research to clinical practice, epidemiology of rheumatic diseases, diagnostic tests for rheumatic diseases, patient reported outcomes (PROs) in rheumatology and evidence on education of rheumatology. Contributions to these topics will appear in the form of original publications, short communications, editorials, and reviews. "Letters to the editor" will be welcome as an enhancement to discussion. Basic science research, including in vitro or animal studies, is discouraged to submit, as we will only review studies on humans with an epidemological or clinical perspective. Case reports without a proper review of the literatura (Case-based Reviews) will not be published. Every effort will be made to ensure speed of publication while maintaining a high standard of contents and production. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信