{"title":"症状性肢体长度差异的计算机断层扫描分析。","authors":"Alex Fleischman, Michael An, Wendy Young","doi":"10.7547/23-179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limb length discrepancy (LLD) is diagnosed when one limb is noted to be longer than the other. Symptomatic LLD is defined as the appearance of symptoms secondary to the compensatory mechanisms of LLD with a measured limb length differential. Several studies have been conducted analyzing LLD through plain radiographs, yet there are only a few studies analyzing LLD using computed tomography (CT) scanography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective baseline study of patients between December 2007 and December 2017 in order to reinforce the side dominance and associated measurements of lower-extremity limb lengths through CT scanograms. The average femoral, tibial, and total limb length was calculated for each extremity. Paired sample t tests were conducted between each osseous component and total limb length.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following institutional review board review and exemption, 400 charts that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed. The left limb was significantly longer than the right limb by approximately 0.10 cm (P < .05). The left femur was significantly longer than the right femur by approximately 0.07 cm (P < .05). There was no significant difference in the tibial length (P > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was a significant limb length differential in which the left limb was longer than the right limb secondary to increased femoral length. Although our results may seem imperative to our understanding of LLD, it is important to state that all of our differentials were similar, with large SDs, indicating low power of the study. Future research with an increased number of participants is warranted to reinforce the findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":17241,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association","volume":"115 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computed Tomography Scanographic Analysis of Symptomatic Limb Length Discrepancy.\",\"authors\":\"Alex Fleischman, Michael An, Wendy Young\",\"doi\":\"10.7547/23-179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limb length discrepancy (LLD) is diagnosed when one limb is noted to be longer than the other. Symptomatic LLD is defined as the appearance of symptoms secondary to the compensatory mechanisms of LLD with a measured limb length differential. Several studies have been conducted analyzing LLD through plain radiographs, yet there are only a few studies analyzing LLD using computed tomography (CT) scanography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective baseline study of patients between December 2007 and December 2017 in order to reinforce the side dominance and associated measurements of lower-extremity limb lengths through CT scanograms. The average femoral, tibial, and total limb length was calculated for each extremity. Paired sample t tests were conducted between each osseous component and total limb length.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following institutional review board review and exemption, 400 charts that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed. The left limb was significantly longer than the right limb by approximately 0.10 cm (P < .05). The left femur was significantly longer than the right femur by approximately 0.07 cm (P < .05). There was no significant difference in the tibial length (P > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was a significant limb length differential in which the left limb was longer than the right limb secondary to increased femoral length. Although our results may seem imperative to our understanding of LLD, it is important to state that all of our differentials were similar, with large SDs, indicating low power of the study. Future research with an increased number of participants is warranted to reinforce the findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association\",\"volume\":\"115 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7547/23-179\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7547/23-179","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:肢体长度差异(LLD)是指一个肢体比另一个肢体长。症状性LLD被定义为继发于LLD代偿机制的症状的出现,具有测量的肢体长度差异。已有一些研究通过x线平片分析LLD,但只有少数研究使用计算机断层扫描(CT)分析LLD。方法:我们对2007年12月至2017年12月期间的患者进行了回顾性基线研究,以通过CT扫描加强侧位优势和下肢长度的相关测量。计算每个肢体的平均股骨、胫骨和总肢体长度。各骨组分与总肢长之间进行配对样本t检验。结果:经过机构评审委员会的审核和豁免,400张符合纳入标准的图表被审核。左肢明显比右肢长约0.10 cm (P < 0.05)。左股骨比右股骨长约0.07 cm (P < 0.05)。两组胫骨长度差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:股骨长度增加导致左下肢比右下肢长,存在明显的肢长差异。虽然我们的结果对于我们对LLD的理解似乎是必要的,但重要的是要指出,我们所有的差异都是相似的,SDs大,表明研究的有效性低。未来的研究将有更多的参与者来加强研究结果。
Computed Tomography Scanographic Analysis of Symptomatic Limb Length Discrepancy.
Background: Limb length discrepancy (LLD) is diagnosed when one limb is noted to be longer than the other. Symptomatic LLD is defined as the appearance of symptoms secondary to the compensatory mechanisms of LLD with a measured limb length differential. Several studies have been conducted analyzing LLD through plain radiographs, yet there are only a few studies analyzing LLD using computed tomography (CT) scanography.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective baseline study of patients between December 2007 and December 2017 in order to reinforce the side dominance and associated measurements of lower-extremity limb lengths through CT scanograms. The average femoral, tibial, and total limb length was calculated for each extremity. Paired sample t tests were conducted between each osseous component and total limb length.
Results: Following institutional review board review and exemption, 400 charts that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed. The left limb was significantly longer than the right limb by approximately 0.10 cm (P < .05). The left femur was significantly longer than the right femur by approximately 0.07 cm (P < .05). There was no significant difference in the tibial length (P > .05).
Conclusions: There was a significant limb length differential in which the left limb was longer than the right limb secondary to increased femoral length. Although our results may seem imperative to our understanding of LLD, it is important to state that all of our differentials were similar, with large SDs, indicating low power of the study. Future research with an increased number of participants is warranted to reinforce the findings.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, the official journal of the Association, is the oldest and most frequently cited peer-reviewed journal in the profession of foot and ankle medicine. Founded in 1907 and appearing 6 times per year, it publishes research studies, case reports, literature reviews, special communications, clinical correspondence, letters to the editor, book reviews, and various other types of submissions. The Journal is included in major indexing and abstracting services for biomedical literature.