Kwangho Kim, Juhwan Song, Hongmin Chu, Robin Kwon, Seongjun Park, Junhui Kwon, Hyeon Joon Hong, Youngyun Lee, Sanghyuk Kwon, Kyungho Kang, Jungtae Leem, Cheol-Hyun Kim
{"title":"超声引导与非引导药物穿刺治疗颈肌筋膜疼痛综合征:一项多中心前瞻性比较研究方案。","authors":"Kwangho Kim, Juhwan Song, Hongmin Chu, Robin Kwon, Seongjun Park, Junhui Kwon, Hyeon Joon Hong, Youngyun Lee, Sanghyuk Kwon, Kyungho Kang, Jungtae Leem, Cheol-Hyun Kim","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S509236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cervical Myofascial Pain Syndrome (CMPS) is a common musculoskeletal disorder that significantly impacts daily life due to pain and restricted movement. This study focuses on Ultrasound-Guided Pharmacopuncture(UGP) to release fascial restrictions and alleviate nerve compression. By utilizing real-time ultrasound imaging, UGP is expected to enhance treatment accuracy, reduce adverse events, and improve clinical outcomes. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of UGP compared to Non-Guided Pharmacopuncture (NGP) in patients with acute CMPS.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This multi-center prospective observational comparative study evaluates the efficacy and safety of UGP versus NGP in patients with acute CMPS. A minimum of 100 patients with acute CMPS (≤7 days since symptom onset) will be recruited from two hospitals and five Korean medicine clinics. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the UGP group (receiving ultrasound-guided pharmacopuncture with Hominis Placenta(HP) solution) or the NGP group (receiving non-guided pharmacopuncture with HP solution). A single treatment session will be conducted, with pre- and post-treatment assessments using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT), and Range of Motion (ROM). Additionally, a follow-up safety assessment will be conducted via telephone 24-36 hours post-treatment.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>This study is the first to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided HP pharmacopuncture for acute CMPS in a multi-center prospective comparative study. The findings are expected to provide comprehensive evidence supporting ultrasound-guided pharmacopuncture as an effective treatment for myofascial pain and may expand its clinical applications, particularly in Korean medicine clinics.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"1417-1431"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11930919/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound-Guided vs Non-Guided Pharmacopuncture for Cervical Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Multi-Center Prospective Comparative Study Protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Kwangho Kim, Juhwan Song, Hongmin Chu, Robin Kwon, Seongjun Park, Junhui Kwon, Hyeon Joon Hong, Youngyun Lee, Sanghyuk Kwon, Kyungho Kang, Jungtae Leem, Cheol-Hyun Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JPR.S509236\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cervical Myofascial Pain Syndrome (CMPS) is a common musculoskeletal disorder that significantly impacts daily life due to pain and restricted movement. This study focuses on Ultrasound-Guided Pharmacopuncture(UGP) to release fascial restrictions and alleviate nerve compression. By utilizing real-time ultrasound imaging, UGP is expected to enhance treatment accuracy, reduce adverse events, and improve clinical outcomes. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of UGP compared to Non-Guided Pharmacopuncture (NGP) in patients with acute CMPS.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This multi-center prospective observational comparative study evaluates the efficacy and safety of UGP versus NGP in patients with acute CMPS. A minimum of 100 patients with acute CMPS (≤7 days since symptom onset) will be recruited from two hospitals and five Korean medicine clinics. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the UGP group (receiving ultrasound-guided pharmacopuncture with Hominis Placenta(HP) solution) or the NGP group (receiving non-guided pharmacopuncture with HP solution). A single treatment session will be conducted, with pre- and post-treatment assessments using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT), and Range of Motion (ROM). Additionally, a follow-up safety assessment will be conducted via telephone 24-36 hours post-treatment.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>This study is the first to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided HP pharmacopuncture for acute CMPS in a multi-center prospective comparative study. The findings are expected to provide comprehensive evidence supporting ultrasound-guided pharmacopuncture as an effective treatment for myofascial pain and may expand its clinical applications, particularly in Korean medicine clinics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"1417-1431\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11930919/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S509236\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S509236","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ultrasound-Guided vs Non-Guided Pharmacopuncture for Cervical Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Multi-Center Prospective Comparative Study Protocol.
Purpose: Cervical Myofascial Pain Syndrome (CMPS) is a common musculoskeletal disorder that significantly impacts daily life due to pain and restricted movement. This study focuses on Ultrasound-Guided Pharmacopuncture(UGP) to release fascial restrictions and alleviate nerve compression. By utilizing real-time ultrasound imaging, UGP is expected to enhance treatment accuracy, reduce adverse events, and improve clinical outcomes. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of UGP compared to Non-Guided Pharmacopuncture (NGP) in patients with acute CMPS.
Patients and methods: This multi-center prospective observational comparative study evaluates the efficacy and safety of UGP versus NGP in patients with acute CMPS. A minimum of 100 patients with acute CMPS (≤7 days since symptom onset) will be recruited from two hospitals and five Korean medicine clinics. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the UGP group (receiving ultrasound-guided pharmacopuncture with Hominis Placenta(HP) solution) or the NGP group (receiving non-guided pharmacopuncture with HP solution). A single treatment session will be conducted, with pre- and post-treatment assessments using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT), and Range of Motion (ROM). Additionally, a follow-up safety assessment will be conducted via telephone 24-36 hours post-treatment.
Discussion and conclusion: This study is the first to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided HP pharmacopuncture for acute CMPS in a multi-center prospective comparative study. The findings are expected to provide comprehensive evidence supporting ultrasound-guided pharmacopuncture as an effective treatment for myofascial pain and may expand its clinical applications, particularly in Korean medicine clinics.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.