Zhiduo Chen, Shudong Tian, Yuge Tian, Beibei Shi, Shangjian Yang
{"title":"各种运动干预对超重或肥胖成人心肺健康的比较效果:一项系统综述和贝叶斯网络meta分析。","authors":"Zhiduo Chen, Shudong Tian, Yuge Tian, Beibei Shi, Shangjian Yang","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2025.2483591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated how different exercise interventions affect maximal oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2max</sub>) in adults with overweight or obesity. We systematically searched five databases from inception to February 2025 to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool. A Bayesian network meta-analysis with a random-effects model was conducted. A total of 93 RCTs involving 4,446 participants were included. The network meta-analysis showed high-intensity interval training (HIIT) ranked highest (Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve [SUCRA]: 82.5%; Standardized Mean Difference [SMD]: 4.85; 95%Credible Interval [CrI]: 3.90, 5.80), followed by high-intensity aerobic training (HAT) (SUCRA: 76.7%; SMD: 4.72; 95%CrI: 3.78, 5.68), and combined aerobic and resistance training (CT) (SUCRA: 69.1%; SMD: 4.52; 95%CrI: 3.48, 5.60), with resistance training (RT) least effective (SUCRA: 18.3%; SMD: 2.57; 95%CrI: 1.32, 3.86). All six interventions effectively improved VO2max in overweight or obese adults. Among them, HIIT was most beneficial. Coaches and fitness professionals should consider these findings to help adults with overweight or obesity achieve optimal outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative effectiveness of various exercise interventions on cardiorespiratory fitness in adults living with overweight or obesity: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Zhiduo Chen, Shudong Tian, Yuge Tian, Beibei Shi, Shangjian Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02640414.2025.2483591\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study evaluated how different exercise interventions affect maximal oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2max</sub>) in adults with overweight or obesity. We systematically searched five databases from inception to February 2025 to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool. A Bayesian network meta-analysis with a random-effects model was conducted. A total of 93 RCTs involving 4,446 participants were included. The network meta-analysis showed high-intensity interval training (HIIT) ranked highest (Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve [SUCRA]: 82.5%; Standardized Mean Difference [SMD]: 4.85; 95%Credible Interval [CrI]: 3.90, 5.80), followed by high-intensity aerobic training (HAT) (SUCRA: 76.7%; SMD: 4.72; 95%CrI: 3.78, 5.68), and combined aerobic and resistance training (CT) (SUCRA: 69.1%; SMD: 4.52; 95%CrI: 3.48, 5.60), with resistance training (RT) least effective (SUCRA: 18.3%; SMD: 2.57; 95%CrI: 1.32, 3.86). All six interventions effectively improved VO2max in overweight or obese adults. Among them, HIIT was most beneficial. Coaches and fitness professionals should consider these findings to help adults with overweight or obesity achieve optimal outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sports Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sports Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2483591\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2483591","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative effectiveness of various exercise interventions on cardiorespiratory fitness in adults living with overweight or obesity: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.
This study evaluated how different exercise interventions affect maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) in adults with overweight or obesity. We systematically searched five databases from inception to February 2025 to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool. A Bayesian network meta-analysis with a random-effects model was conducted. A total of 93 RCTs involving 4,446 participants were included. The network meta-analysis showed high-intensity interval training (HIIT) ranked highest (Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve [SUCRA]: 82.5%; Standardized Mean Difference [SMD]: 4.85; 95%Credible Interval [CrI]: 3.90, 5.80), followed by high-intensity aerobic training (HAT) (SUCRA: 76.7%; SMD: 4.72; 95%CrI: 3.78, 5.68), and combined aerobic and resistance training (CT) (SUCRA: 69.1%; SMD: 4.52; 95%CrI: 3.48, 5.60), with resistance training (RT) least effective (SUCRA: 18.3%; SMD: 2.57; 95%CrI: 1.32, 3.86). All six interventions effectively improved VO2max in overweight or obese adults. Among them, HIIT was most beneficial. Coaches and fitness professionals should consider these findings to help adults with overweight or obesity achieve optimal outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives.
The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.