各种运动干预对超重或肥胖成人心肺健康的比较效果:一项系统综述和贝叶斯网络meta分析。

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Zhiduo Chen, Shudong Tian, Yuge Tian, Beibei Shi, Shangjian Yang
{"title":"各种运动干预对超重或肥胖成人心肺健康的比较效果:一项系统综述和贝叶斯网络meta分析。","authors":"Zhiduo Chen, Shudong Tian, Yuge Tian, Beibei Shi, Shangjian Yang","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2025.2483591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated how different exercise interventions affect maximal oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2max</sub>) in adults with overweight or obesity. We systematically searched five databases from inception to February 2025 to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool. A Bayesian network meta-analysis with a random-effects model was conducted. A total of 93 RCTs involving 4,446 participants were included. The network meta-analysis showed high-intensity interval training (HIIT) ranked highest (Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve [SUCRA]: 82.5%; Standardized Mean Difference [SMD]: 4.85; 95%Credible Interval [CrI]: 3.90, 5.80), followed by high-intensity aerobic training (HAT) (SUCRA: 76.7%; SMD: 4.72; 95%CrI: 3.78, 5.68), and combined aerobic and resistance training (CT) (SUCRA: 69.1%; SMD: 4.52; 95%CrI: 3.48, 5.60), with resistance training (RT) least effective (SUCRA: 18.3%; SMD: 2.57; 95%CrI: 1.32, 3.86). All six interventions effectively improved VO2max in overweight or obese adults. Among them, HIIT was most beneficial. Coaches and fitness professionals should consider these findings to help adults with overweight or obesity achieve optimal outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative effectiveness of various exercise interventions on cardiorespiratory fitness in adults living with overweight or obesity: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Zhiduo Chen, Shudong Tian, Yuge Tian, Beibei Shi, Shangjian Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02640414.2025.2483591\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study evaluated how different exercise interventions affect maximal oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2max</sub>) in adults with overweight or obesity. We systematically searched five databases from inception to February 2025 to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool. A Bayesian network meta-analysis with a random-effects model was conducted. A total of 93 RCTs involving 4,446 participants were included. The network meta-analysis showed high-intensity interval training (HIIT) ranked highest (Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve [SUCRA]: 82.5%; Standardized Mean Difference [SMD]: 4.85; 95%Credible Interval [CrI]: 3.90, 5.80), followed by high-intensity aerobic training (HAT) (SUCRA: 76.7%; SMD: 4.72; 95%CrI: 3.78, 5.68), and combined aerobic and resistance training (CT) (SUCRA: 69.1%; SMD: 4.52; 95%CrI: 3.48, 5.60), with resistance training (RT) least effective (SUCRA: 18.3%; SMD: 2.57; 95%CrI: 1.32, 3.86). All six interventions effectively improved VO2max in overweight or obese adults. Among them, HIIT was most beneficial. Coaches and fitness professionals should consider these findings to help adults with overweight or obesity achieve optimal outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sports Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sports Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2483591\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2483591","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了不同运动干预对超重或肥胖成人最大摄氧量(VO2max)的影响。我们系统地检索了5个数据库,从建立到2025年2月,以确定相关的随机对照试验(rct)。我们使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具。采用随机效应模型进行贝叶斯网络元分析。共纳入93项随机对照试验,涉及4446名受试者。网络荟萃分析显示,高强度间歇训练(HIIT)排名最高(Surface Under Cumulative Ranking Curve [SUCRA]: 82.5%;标准化均差[SMD]: 4.85;95%可信区间[CrI]: 3.90, 5.80),其次是高强度有氧训练(HAT) (SUCRA: 76.7%;SMD: 4.72;95%CrI: 3.78, 5.68),有氧与阻力联合训练(CT) (SUCRA: 69.1%;SMD: 4.52;95%CrI: 3.48, 5.60),阻力训练(RT)效果最差(SUCRA: 18.3%;SMD: 2.57;95%CrI: 1.32, 3.86)。所有六种干预措施都有效地改善了超重或肥胖成年人的最大摄氧量。其中,HIIT最为有益。教练和健身专业人士应该考虑这些发现,以帮助超重或肥胖的成年人达到最佳效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative effectiveness of various exercise interventions on cardiorespiratory fitness in adults living with overweight or obesity: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

This study evaluated how different exercise interventions affect maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) in adults with overweight or obesity. We systematically searched five databases from inception to February 2025 to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool. A Bayesian network meta-analysis with a random-effects model was conducted. A total of 93 RCTs involving 4,446 participants were included. The network meta-analysis showed high-intensity interval training (HIIT) ranked highest (Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve [SUCRA]: 82.5%; Standardized Mean Difference [SMD]: 4.85; 95%Credible Interval [CrI]: 3.90, 5.80), followed by high-intensity aerobic training (HAT) (SUCRA: 76.7%; SMD: 4.72; 95%CrI: 3.78, 5.68), and combined aerobic and resistance training (CT) (SUCRA: 69.1%; SMD: 4.52; 95%CrI: 3.48, 5.60), with resistance training (RT) least effective (SUCRA: 18.3%; SMD: 2.57; 95%CrI: 1.32, 3.86). All six interventions effectively improved VO2max in overweight or obese adults. Among them, HIIT was most beneficial. Coaches and fitness professionals should consider these findings to help adults with overweight or obesity achieve optimal outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sports Sciences
Journal of Sports Sciences 社会科学-运动科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
147
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives. The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信