Amir H Nejat, Edwin Kee, Meghan R Belanger, Hamidreza Rajati, Nathaniel C Lawson
{"title":"目前用于间接修复的CAD/CAM陶瓷的x线摄影评价。","authors":"Amir H Nejat, Edwin Kee, Meghan R Belanger, Hamidreza Rajati, Nathaniel C Lawson","doi":"10.1111/jerd.13464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To measure and compare the radiopacity values of available computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) restorative materials used for the fabrication of long-term single-tooth indirect restorations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>1 and 2 mm thick samples (n = 10 per material) were fabricated from different CAD/CAM materials, including glass-matrix (VITA mark II, Empress CAD, VITA Suprinity, Celtra DUO, and e.max CAD), polycrystalline (3Y zirconia, Katana HTML Plus), and resin-matrix ceramics (VITA Enamic, Lava Ultimate, Flexcera Smile Ultra Plus, Sprintray Ceramic Crown, VarseoSmile TriniQ, and Rodin Sculpture 2.0). The samples were placed on a digital X-ray sensor along with an aluminum step wedge and a tooth section with similar thickness. The gray scale value was measured in Image J software and converted to mmAl using Curve Expert Pro 2.7 software. Data were analyzed with a two-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey tests, with the significance level set at 95% (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Type of restorative material and thickness had a significant effect on the radiopacity values (p < 0.05). Radiopacity of all tested materials was similar to (Sprintray Ceramics Crown, p > 0.05) or significantly higher (p < 0.05) than the radiopacity of the dentin, except for VITA Mark II, VITA Enamic, Flexcera Smile Ultra Plus, and VarseoSmile TriniQ, which had a significantly lower radiopacity than dentin (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiopacity of evaluated CAD/CAM materials was significantly different. The highest radiopacity was observed in zirconia, and the lowest radiopacity was found in Flexcera Smile Ultra Plus.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Radiopacity of most of the tested CAD/CAM materials was equal to or higher than that of dentin with a similar thickness. However, VITA mark II, VITA Enamic, Flexcera Smile Ultra Plus, VarseoSmile TriniQ had lower radiopacity than dentin and their radiographic evaluation would be dependent on the radiopacity of the cement for detection of recurrent caries. Understanding the radiopacity of each CAD/CAM material helps clinicians select the appropriate material and helps them detect the type of restorative material.</p>","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiographic Evaluation of Current Restorative CAD/CAM Ceramics Indicated for Fabrication of Indirect Restoration.\",\"authors\":\"Amir H Nejat, Edwin Kee, Meghan R Belanger, Hamidreza Rajati, Nathaniel C Lawson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jerd.13464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To measure and compare the radiopacity values of available computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) restorative materials used for the fabrication of long-term single-tooth indirect restorations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>1 and 2 mm thick samples (n = 10 per material) were fabricated from different CAD/CAM materials, including glass-matrix (VITA mark II, Empress CAD, VITA Suprinity, Celtra DUO, and e.max CAD), polycrystalline (3Y zirconia, Katana HTML Plus), and resin-matrix ceramics (VITA Enamic, Lava Ultimate, Flexcera Smile Ultra Plus, Sprintray Ceramic Crown, VarseoSmile TriniQ, and Rodin Sculpture 2.0). The samples were placed on a digital X-ray sensor along with an aluminum step wedge and a tooth section with similar thickness. The gray scale value was measured in Image J software and converted to mmAl using Curve Expert Pro 2.7 software. Data were analyzed with a two-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey tests, with the significance level set at 95% (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Type of restorative material and thickness had a significant effect on the radiopacity values (p < 0.05). Radiopacity of all tested materials was similar to (Sprintray Ceramics Crown, p > 0.05) or significantly higher (p < 0.05) than the radiopacity of the dentin, except for VITA Mark II, VITA Enamic, Flexcera Smile Ultra Plus, and VarseoSmile TriniQ, which had a significantly lower radiopacity than dentin (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiopacity of evaluated CAD/CAM materials was significantly different. The highest radiopacity was observed in zirconia, and the lowest radiopacity was found in Flexcera Smile Ultra Plus.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Radiopacity of most of the tested CAD/CAM materials was equal to or higher than that of dentin with a similar thickness. However, VITA mark II, VITA Enamic, Flexcera Smile Ultra Plus, VarseoSmile TriniQ had lower radiopacity than dentin and their radiographic evaluation would be dependent on the radiopacity of the cement for detection of recurrent caries. Understanding the radiopacity of each CAD/CAM material helps clinicians select the appropriate material and helps them detect the type of restorative material.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13464\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13464","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:测量和比较现有的计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)修复材料用于制作长期单牙间接修复体的放射不透明度值。材料和方法:1和2毫米厚的样品(每种材料n = 10)由不同的CAD/CAM材料制成,包括玻璃基(VITA mark II, Empress CAD, VITA Suprinity, Celtra DUO和e.max CAD),多晶(3Y氧化锆,Katana HTML Plus)和树脂基陶瓷(VITA Enamic, Lava Ultimate, Flexcera Smile Ultra Plus, Sprintray陶瓷冠,VarseoSmile TriniQ和罗丹雕塑2.0)。样品被放置在一个数字x射线传感器与一个铝制阶梯楔和齿段具有相似的厚度。灰度值在Image J软件中测量,用Curve Expert Pro 2.7软件转换为mmAl。数据分析采用双因素方差分析和事后Tukey检验,显著性水平为95% (α = 0.05)。结果:修复体材料的种类和厚度对冠状动脉的放射不透明值有显著影响(p < 0.05)或显著提高(p < 0.05)。结论:评价的CAD/CAM材料的放射不透明值有显著差异。氧化锆的透光度最高,Flexcera Smile Ultra Plus的透光度最低。临床意义:所测CAD/CAM材料的放射透明度大多等于或高于相近厚度的牙本质。然而,VITA mark II、VITA Enamic、Flexcera Smile Ultra Plus、VarseoSmile TriniQ的放射不透明度比牙本质低,其影像学评价将依赖于骨水泥的放射不透明度来检测复发性龋。了解每种CAD/CAM材料的放射不透明度有助于临床医生选择合适的材料,并帮助他们检测修复材料的类型。
Radiographic Evaluation of Current Restorative CAD/CAM Ceramics Indicated for Fabrication of Indirect Restoration.
Objectives: To measure and compare the radiopacity values of available computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) restorative materials used for the fabrication of long-term single-tooth indirect restorations.
Materials and methods: 1 and 2 mm thick samples (n = 10 per material) were fabricated from different CAD/CAM materials, including glass-matrix (VITA mark II, Empress CAD, VITA Suprinity, Celtra DUO, and e.max CAD), polycrystalline (3Y zirconia, Katana HTML Plus), and resin-matrix ceramics (VITA Enamic, Lava Ultimate, Flexcera Smile Ultra Plus, Sprintray Ceramic Crown, VarseoSmile TriniQ, and Rodin Sculpture 2.0). The samples were placed on a digital X-ray sensor along with an aluminum step wedge and a tooth section with similar thickness. The gray scale value was measured in Image J software and converted to mmAl using Curve Expert Pro 2.7 software. Data were analyzed with a two-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey tests, with the significance level set at 95% (α = 0.05).
Results: Type of restorative material and thickness had a significant effect on the radiopacity values (p < 0.05). Radiopacity of all tested materials was similar to (Sprintray Ceramics Crown, p > 0.05) or significantly higher (p < 0.05) than the radiopacity of the dentin, except for VITA Mark II, VITA Enamic, Flexcera Smile Ultra Plus, and VarseoSmile TriniQ, which had a significantly lower radiopacity than dentin (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Radiopacity of evaluated CAD/CAM materials was significantly different. The highest radiopacity was observed in zirconia, and the lowest radiopacity was found in Flexcera Smile Ultra Plus.
Clinical significance: Radiopacity of most of the tested CAD/CAM materials was equal to or higher than that of dentin with a similar thickness. However, VITA mark II, VITA Enamic, Flexcera Smile Ultra Plus, VarseoSmile TriniQ had lower radiopacity than dentin and their radiographic evaluation would be dependent on the radiopacity of the cement for detection of recurrent caries. Understanding the radiopacity of each CAD/CAM material helps clinicians select the appropriate material and helps them detect the type of restorative material.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features.
The range of topics covered in the journal includes:
- Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts
- Implants
- Conservative adhesive restorations
- Tooth Whitening
- Prosthodontic materials and techniques
- Dental materials
- Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics
- Esthetics related research
- Innovations in esthetics