{"title":"一年两次的阿奇霉素大量给药以降低儿童死亡率:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Meenalotchini Prakash Gurunthalingam, Madhusudan Prasad Singh, Nitin Rewaram Gaikwad","doi":"10.1093/jac/dkaf092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biannual mass drug administration of azithromycin (MDA-azithromycin) has been proposed as a strategy to reduce childhood mortality in high-mortality regions, particularly sub-Saharan Africa. However, its effectiveness across different age groups and potential risks, including antibiotic resistance, require further evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov through September 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing biannual MDA-azithromycin to placebo in children aged 1-59 months. The primary outcomes were mortality in children <1 year and 12-59 months. Secondary outcomes included adverse events and antibiotic resistance. Data were analysed using a random-effects model in Review Manager 5.4, with heterogeneity assessed via I2. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) evaluated cumulative evidence reliability, and the Cochrane RoB2 tool assessed risk of bias. PROSPERO registration: CRD42024589170.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five RCTs (691 235 children) were included. Among children <1 year, azithromycin showed a non-significant mortality reduction (RR: 0.90 [0.78, 1.04]; P = 0.14; I2 = 55%), with TSA indicating inconclusive evidence. Among children 12-59 months, MDA-azithromycin significantly reduced mortality (RR: 0.85 [0.79, 0.91]; P < 0.00001; I2 = 26%), with TSA confirming sufficient evidence. Adverse events were rare, but antibiotic resistance data were limited, warranting further monitoring. Evidence quality ranged from moderate to very low, with one trial at high risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Biannual MDA-azithromycin significantly reduces mortality in children 12-59 months, supporting its use in high-mortality settings per WHO recommendations. Its impact on infants remains uncertain. Adverse events were minimal, but continued resistance surveillance is essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":14969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biannual azithromycin mass drug administration for reduction of childhood mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Meenalotchini Prakash Gurunthalingam, Madhusudan Prasad Singh, Nitin Rewaram Gaikwad\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jac/dkaf092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biannual mass drug administration of azithromycin (MDA-azithromycin) has been proposed as a strategy to reduce childhood mortality in high-mortality regions, particularly sub-Saharan Africa. However, its effectiveness across different age groups and potential risks, including antibiotic resistance, require further evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov through September 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing biannual MDA-azithromycin to placebo in children aged 1-59 months. The primary outcomes were mortality in children <1 year and 12-59 months. Secondary outcomes included adverse events and antibiotic resistance. Data were analysed using a random-effects model in Review Manager 5.4, with heterogeneity assessed via I2. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) evaluated cumulative evidence reliability, and the Cochrane RoB2 tool assessed risk of bias. PROSPERO registration: CRD42024589170.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five RCTs (691 235 children) were included. Among children <1 year, azithromycin showed a non-significant mortality reduction (RR: 0.90 [0.78, 1.04]; P = 0.14; I2 = 55%), with TSA indicating inconclusive evidence. Among children 12-59 months, MDA-azithromycin significantly reduced mortality (RR: 0.85 [0.79, 0.91]; P < 0.00001; I2 = 26%), with TSA confirming sufficient evidence. Adverse events were rare, but antibiotic resistance data were limited, warranting further monitoring. Evidence quality ranged from moderate to very low, with one trial at high risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Biannual MDA-azithromycin significantly reduces mortality in children 12-59 months, supporting its use in high-mortality settings per WHO recommendations. Its impact on infants remains uncertain. Adverse events were minimal, but continued resistance surveillance is essential.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaf092\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaf092","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:一年两次的阿奇霉素(mda -阿奇霉素)大规模给药已被提议作为降低高死亡率地区,特别是撒哈拉以南非洲儿童死亡率的战略。然而,它在不同年龄组的有效性和潜在风险,包括抗生素耐药性,需要进一步评估。方法:我们系统地检索PubMed、Cochrane CENTRAL、Web of Science和ClinicalTrials.gov,检索到2024年9月的随机对照试验(rct),比较一年两次的mda -阿奇霉素与安慰剂在1-59个月儿童中的作用。结果:纳入5项随机对照试验(691 235名儿童)。结论:一年两次的mda -阿奇霉素可显著降低12-59个月儿童的死亡率,支持按照世卫组织的建议在高死亡率环境中使用阿奇霉素。它对婴儿的影响仍不确定。不良事件极少,但持续的耐药性监测至关重要。
Biannual azithromycin mass drug administration for reduction of childhood mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: Biannual mass drug administration of azithromycin (MDA-azithromycin) has been proposed as a strategy to reduce childhood mortality in high-mortality regions, particularly sub-Saharan Africa. However, its effectiveness across different age groups and potential risks, including antibiotic resistance, require further evaluation.
Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov through September 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing biannual MDA-azithromycin to placebo in children aged 1-59 months. The primary outcomes were mortality in children <1 year and 12-59 months. Secondary outcomes included adverse events and antibiotic resistance. Data were analysed using a random-effects model in Review Manager 5.4, with heterogeneity assessed via I2. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) evaluated cumulative evidence reliability, and the Cochrane RoB2 tool assessed risk of bias. PROSPERO registration: CRD42024589170.
Results: Five RCTs (691 235 children) were included. Among children <1 year, azithromycin showed a non-significant mortality reduction (RR: 0.90 [0.78, 1.04]; P = 0.14; I2 = 55%), with TSA indicating inconclusive evidence. Among children 12-59 months, MDA-azithromycin significantly reduced mortality (RR: 0.85 [0.79, 0.91]; P < 0.00001; I2 = 26%), with TSA confirming sufficient evidence. Adverse events were rare, but antibiotic resistance data were limited, warranting further monitoring. Evidence quality ranged from moderate to very low, with one trial at high risk of bias.
Conclusion: Biannual MDA-azithromycin significantly reduces mortality in children 12-59 months, supporting its use in high-mortality settings per WHO recommendations. Its impact on infants remains uncertain. Adverse events were minimal, but continued resistance surveillance is essential.
期刊介绍:
The Journal publishes articles that further knowledge and advance the science and application of antimicrobial chemotherapy with antibiotics and antifungal, antiviral and antiprotozoal agents. The Journal publishes primarily in human medicine, and articles in veterinary medicine likely to have an impact on global health.