联合GLP-1受体激动剂和SGLT2抑制剂治疗2型糖尿病:利用名义组技术进行临床实践的范围审查和专家见解

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Carlos A Yepes-Cortés, Isabel C Cardenas-Moreno, Rodrigo Daza-Arnedo, Karen M Feriz-Bonelo, Erica Yama-Mosquera, Alex H Ramirez-Rincón, Gilberto A Castillo-Barrios, Andres F Suarez-Rodriguez, Johanna Carreño-Jiménez, Carlos E Builes-Montaño
{"title":"联合GLP-1受体激动剂和SGLT2抑制剂治疗2型糖尿病:利用名义组技术进行临床实践的范围审查和专家见解","authors":"Carlos A Yepes-Cortés, Isabel C Cardenas-Moreno, Rodrigo Daza-Arnedo, Karen M Feriz-Bonelo, Erica Yama-Mosquera, Alex H Ramirez-Rincón, Gilberto A Castillo-Barrios, Andres F Suarez-Rodriguez, Johanna Carreño-Jiménez, Carlos E Builes-Montaño","doi":"10.1007/s13300-025-01722-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Treating type 2 diabetes has shifted from a gluco-centric approach to broader cardio-renal-metabolic strategy, driven by the use of disease-modifying medications. Traditionally, diabetes management has relied on stepwise medication addition based on failures in glucose control. However, the benefits and risks of combining glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) remain inadequately understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study conducted a scoping review to examine the available clinical research on the benefits and risks of combining GLP1-RAs and SGLT2is. Additionally, the nominal group technique was used to gather insights from medical experts from different areas regarding the combined therapy's daily clinical use, concerns, and limitations. The review followed the guidelines outlined in the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual and the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final report includes 50 studies. The most common designs are observational studies. The median (IQR) number of patients across studies was 355 (1295). Studies reporting metabolic outcomes were the most common. The follow-up time ranges from 1.5 to 60 months. Although limited, the available evidence seems to support the combined use of GLP1-RAs and SGLT2is. The experts agreed that the underlying mechanisms appear synergistic rather than antagonistic for most outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combining medical therapy is common in diabetes treatment and may occur naturally in everyday practice. Limited evidence suggests that combined SGLT2is/GLP1-RAs therapy can potentially improve most but not all outcomes. Quality evidence and better-defined outcomes are paramount to guide the selection of patients for combined therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11192,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combining GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and SGLT2 Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Scoping Review and Expert Insights for Clinical Practice Utilizing the Nominal Group Technique.\",\"authors\":\"Carlos A Yepes-Cortés, Isabel C Cardenas-Moreno, Rodrigo Daza-Arnedo, Karen M Feriz-Bonelo, Erica Yama-Mosquera, Alex H Ramirez-Rincón, Gilberto A Castillo-Barrios, Andres F Suarez-Rodriguez, Johanna Carreño-Jiménez, Carlos E Builes-Montaño\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13300-025-01722-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Treating type 2 diabetes has shifted from a gluco-centric approach to broader cardio-renal-metabolic strategy, driven by the use of disease-modifying medications. Traditionally, diabetes management has relied on stepwise medication addition based on failures in glucose control. However, the benefits and risks of combining glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) remain inadequately understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study conducted a scoping review to examine the available clinical research on the benefits and risks of combining GLP1-RAs and SGLT2is. Additionally, the nominal group technique was used to gather insights from medical experts from different areas regarding the combined therapy's daily clinical use, concerns, and limitations. The review followed the guidelines outlined in the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual and the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final report includes 50 studies. The most common designs are observational studies. The median (IQR) number of patients across studies was 355 (1295). Studies reporting metabolic outcomes were the most common. The follow-up time ranges from 1.5 to 60 months. Although limited, the available evidence seems to support the combined use of GLP1-RAs and SGLT2is. The experts agreed that the underlying mechanisms appear synergistic rather than antagonistic for most outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combining medical therapy is common in diabetes treatment and may occur naturally in everyday practice. Limited evidence suggests that combined SGLT2is/GLP1-RAs therapy can potentially improve most but not all outcomes. Quality evidence and better-defined outcomes are paramount to guide the selection of patients for combined therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-025-01722-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-025-01722-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:2型糖尿病的治疗已经从以血糖为中心的方法转向更广泛的心肾代谢策略,这是由疾病调节药物的使用驱动的。传统上,糖尿病管理依赖于基于葡萄糖控制失败的逐步药物添加。然而,联合胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP1-RAs)和钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2is)的益处和风险仍未充分了解。方法:本研究对现有GLP1-RAs和SGLT2is联合应用的获益和风险的临床研究进行了综述。此外,名义小组技术用于收集来自不同领域的医学专家对联合疗法的日常临床使用、关注和局限性的见解。该综述遵循了乔安娜布里格斯研究所审稿人手册和PRISMA-ScR(系统评价和荟萃分析扩展范围评价的首选报告项目)中概述的指南。结果:最终报告包括50项研究。最常见的设计是观察性研究。研究中患者的中位数(IQR)为355(1295)。报告代谢结果的研究最为常见。随访时间为1.5 ~ 60个月。尽管有限,但现有证据似乎支持GLP1-RAs和SGLT2is联合使用。专家们一致认为,在大多数结果中,潜在的机制似乎是协同的,而不是对抗的。结论:药物联合治疗在糖尿病治疗中是常见的,在日常实践中可能是自然发生的。有限的证据表明SGLT2is/GLP1-RAs联合治疗可以潜在地改善大部分但不是所有的结果。高质量的证据和更好定义的结果对于指导选择联合治疗的患者至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combining GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and SGLT2 Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Scoping Review and Expert Insights for Clinical Practice Utilizing the Nominal Group Technique.

Introduction: Treating type 2 diabetes has shifted from a gluco-centric approach to broader cardio-renal-metabolic strategy, driven by the use of disease-modifying medications. Traditionally, diabetes management has relied on stepwise medication addition based on failures in glucose control. However, the benefits and risks of combining glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) remain inadequately understood.

Methods: This study conducted a scoping review to examine the available clinical research on the benefits and risks of combining GLP1-RAs and SGLT2is. Additionally, the nominal group technique was used to gather insights from medical experts from different areas regarding the combined therapy's daily clinical use, concerns, and limitations. The review followed the guidelines outlined in the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual and the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews).

Results: The final report includes 50 studies. The most common designs are observational studies. The median (IQR) number of patients across studies was 355 (1295). Studies reporting metabolic outcomes were the most common. The follow-up time ranges from 1.5 to 60 months. Although limited, the available evidence seems to support the combined use of GLP1-RAs and SGLT2is. The experts agreed that the underlying mechanisms appear synergistic rather than antagonistic for most outcomes.

Conclusions: Combining medical therapy is common in diabetes treatment and may occur naturally in everyday practice. Limited evidence suggests that combined SGLT2is/GLP1-RAs therapy can potentially improve most but not all outcomes. Quality evidence and better-defined outcomes are paramount to guide the selection of patients for combined therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes Therapy
Diabetes Therapy Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
7.90%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all areas of diabetes. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Diabetes Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信