从其他治疗转向创伤后应激障碍的循证心理治疗:临床医生观点的定性调查。

IF 4.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Nicholas Holder, Rachel M Ranney, Alejandra K Delgado, Natalie Purcell, Gayle Y Iwamasa, Adam Batten, Thomas C Neylan, Brian Shiner, Shira Maguen
{"title":"从其他治疗转向创伤后应激障碍的循证心理治疗:临床医生观点的定性调查。","authors":"Nicholas Holder, Rachel M Ranney, Alejandra K Delgado, Natalie Purcell, Gayle Y Iwamasa, Adam Batten, Thomas C Neylan, Brian Shiner, Shira Maguen","doi":"10.1080/16506073.2025.2481475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many veterans do not initiate trauma-focused evidence-based psychotherapy (TF-EBP) to treat posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Instead, veterans receive other treatments prior to TF-EBP and the process of transitioning to TF-EBP is poorly understood. The goal of the current study was to understand clinicians' beliefs about and approaches to transitioning veterans into TF-EBP. Clinicians (<i>n</i> = 20) with any experience providing TF-EBP from across the national VA healthcare system participated in semi-structured qualitative interviews. Rapid qualitative analysis procedures were used to identify themes: (1) TF-EBP is rarely contraindicated; (2) there is no consensus on treatment alternatives after veterans decline TF-EBP; (3) unstructured therapy can be a barrier to TF-EBP; (4) data from non-TF-EBP can be used to encourage TF-EBP engagement; (5) veterans are poorly informed about PTSD referrals; (6) culturally responsive PTSD care involves asking questions throughout the treatment process; (7) TF-EBP was delivered with attention to how identity may impact treatment; (8) TF-EBP was among the first treatment option offered by all clinicians; (9) veterans initiate TF-EBP when willing; and (10) clinicians developed resources socialize veterans to structured treatment. Since non-TF-EBP approaches may be indicated (or requested) for some veterans, strategies to facilitate transitions to TF-EBP are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":10535,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transitions to trauma-focused evidence-based psychotherapy for posttraumatic stress disorder from other treatments: a qualitative investigation of clinicians' perspectives.\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas Holder, Rachel M Ranney, Alejandra K Delgado, Natalie Purcell, Gayle Y Iwamasa, Adam Batten, Thomas C Neylan, Brian Shiner, Shira Maguen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/16506073.2025.2481475\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Many veterans do not initiate trauma-focused evidence-based psychotherapy (TF-EBP) to treat posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Instead, veterans receive other treatments prior to TF-EBP and the process of transitioning to TF-EBP is poorly understood. The goal of the current study was to understand clinicians' beliefs about and approaches to transitioning veterans into TF-EBP. Clinicians (<i>n</i> = 20) with any experience providing TF-EBP from across the national VA healthcare system participated in semi-structured qualitative interviews. Rapid qualitative analysis procedures were used to identify themes: (1) TF-EBP is rarely contraindicated; (2) there is no consensus on treatment alternatives after veterans decline TF-EBP; (3) unstructured therapy can be a barrier to TF-EBP; (4) data from non-TF-EBP can be used to encourage TF-EBP engagement; (5) veterans are poorly informed about PTSD referrals; (6) culturally responsive PTSD care involves asking questions throughout the treatment process; (7) TF-EBP was delivered with attention to how identity may impact treatment; (8) TF-EBP was among the first treatment option offered by all clinicians; (9) veterans initiate TF-EBP when willing; and (10) clinicians developed resources socialize veterans to structured treatment. Since non-TF-EBP approaches may be indicated (or requested) for some veterans, strategies to facilitate transitions to TF-EBP are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2025.2481475\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2025.2481475","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多退伍军人并没有开始以创伤为中心的循证心理治疗(TF-EBP)来治疗创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)。相反,退伍军人在接受TF-EBP之前接受其他治疗,而向TF-EBP过渡的过程鲜为人知。本研究的目的是了解临床医生对将退伍军人转变为TF-EBP的看法和方法。来自全国VA医疗保健系统具有TF-EBP提供经验的临床医生(n = 20)参加了半结构化定性访谈。使用快速定性分析程序来确定主题:(1)TF-EBP很少有禁忌症;(2)退伍军人TF-EBP下降后的治疗方案未达成共识;(3)非结构化治疗可能成为TF-EBP的障碍;(4)来自非TF-EBP的数据可以用来鼓励TF-EBP的参与;(5)退伍军人对PTSD转诊的了解不足;(6)创伤后应激障碍文化响应式护理包括在整个治疗过程中提出问题;(7) TF-EBP的交付注重身份如何影响治疗;(8) TF-EBP是所有临床医生提供的首选治疗方案之一;(9)退伍军人自愿发起TF-EBP;(10)临床医生开发资源,社会化老兵的结构化治疗。由于一些退伍军人可能需要(或要求)采用非TF-EBP方法,因此需要一些策略来促进向TF-EBP的过渡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transitions to trauma-focused evidence-based psychotherapy for posttraumatic stress disorder from other treatments: a qualitative investigation of clinicians' perspectives.

Many veterans do not initiate trauma-focused evidence-based psychotherapy (TF-EBP) to treat posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Instead, veterans receive other treatments prior to TF-EBP and the process of transitioning to TF-EBP is poorly understood. The goal of the current study was to understand clinicians' beliefs about and approaches to transitioning veterans into TF-EBP. Clinicians (n = 20) with any experience providing TF-EBP from across the national VA healthcare system participated in semi-structured qualitative interviews. Rapid qualitative analysis procedures were used to identify themes: (1) TF-EBP is rarely contraindicated; (2) there is no consensus on treatment alternatives after veterans decline TF-EBP; (3) unstructured therapy can be a barrier to TF-EBP; (4) data from non-TF-EBP can be used to encourage TF-EBP engagement; (5) veterans are poorly informed about PTSD referrals; (6) culturally responsive PTSD care involves asking questions throughout the treatment process; (7) TF-EBP was delivered with attention to how identity may impact treatment; (8) TF-EBP was among the first treatment option offered by all clinicians; (9) veterans initiate TF-EBP when willing; and (10) clinicians developed resources socialize veterans to structured treatment. Since non-TF-EBP approaches may be indicated (or requested) for some veterans, strategies to facilitate transitions to TF-EBP are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Cognitive Behaviour Therapy is a peer reviewed, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the application of behavioural and cognitive sciences to clinical psychology and psychotherapy. The journal publishes state-of-the-art scientific articles within: - clinical and health psychology - psychopathology - behavioural medicine - assessment - treatment - theoretical issues pertinent to behavioural, cognitive and combined cognitive behavioural therapies With the number of high quality contributions increasing, the journal has been able to maintain a rapid publication schedule, providing readers with the latest research in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信