正畸患者两种下颌舌固位器稳定性和满意度的比较评估。一项为期2年的随访,单一的基于实践的随机试验。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Dorota Tymińska, Ewa Węgrodzka, Nikolaos Pandis, Potr S Fudalej
{"title":"正畸患者两种下颌舌固位器稳定性和满意度的比较评估。一项为期2年的随访,单一的基于实践的随机试验。","authors":"Dorota Tymińska, Ewa Węgrodzka, Nikolaos Pandis, Potr S Fudalej","doi":"10.1093/ejo/cjaf013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate and compare the stability of mandibular dental arch dimensions and patient satisfaction between two types of fixed retainers-3-strand round twisted (RT) and 8-strand rectangular braided (RB)-both of which are bonded to all six anterior mandibular teeth.</p><p><strong>Trial design: </strong>2-arm parallel, two-center prospective randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: participants: </strong>133 orthodontic patients (median age 24.6 years, 25th percentile = 17.2 years, 75th percentile = 32.4 years) were recruited.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>These patients were randomly assigned to receive either an RT or RB wire retainer at a 1:1 ratio.</p><p><strong>Randomization: </strong>It was achieved using random permuted blocks of sizes 4, 6, or 8, which were concealed in sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>The primary outcome was the change in the irregularity index, with secondary outcomes including arch length; intercanine, interpremolar, and intermolar widths; and patient satisfaction. Evaluations were performed at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after retainer placement. Dental cast measurements were analyzed using random effects linear regression, and satisfaction was assessed at each time point.</p><p><strong>Blinding: </strong>Blinding of patients was not feasible. Only blinding the assessor for patient satisfaction was achieved.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cast measurements remained relatively stable from T1 to T6, with no significant difference attributed to the retainer type (RT or RB). Time significantly affected all cast measurements except for the irregularity index. There was no significant correlation between retainer type or time and satisfaction questionnaire responses, although the responses varied by question. No harms were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both RT and RB wire retainers effectively maintain mandibular arch alignment and are equally well tolerated by patients in the medium term.</p>","PeriodicalId":11989,"journal":{"name":"European journal of orthodontics","volume":"47 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative assessment of stability and satisfaction between two mandibular lingual retainers in orthodontic patients. A 2-year follow-up, single practice-based randomized trial.\",\"authors\":\"Dorota Tymińska, Ewa Węgrodzka, Nikolaos Pandis, Potr S Fudalej\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ejo/cjaf013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate and compare the stability of mandibular dental arch dimensions and patient satisfaction between two types of fixed retainers-3-strand round twisted (RT) and 8-strand rectangular braided (RB)-both of which are bonded to all six anterior mandibular teeth.</p><p><strong>Trial design: </strong>2-arm parallel, two-center prospective randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: participants: </strong>133 orthodontic patients (median age 24.6 years, 25th percentile = 17.2 years, 75th percentile = 32.4 years) were recruited.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>These patients were randomly assigned to receive either an RT or RB wire retainer at a 1:1 ratio.</p><p><strong>Randomization: </strong>It was achieved using random permuted blocks of sizes 4, 6, or 8, which were concealed in sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>The primary outcome was the change in the irregularity index, with secondary outcomes including arch length; intercanine, interpremolar, and intermolar widths; and patient satisfaction. Evaluations were performed at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after retainer placement. Dental cast measurements were analyzed using random effects linear regression, and satisfaction was assessed at each time point.</p><p><strong>Blinding: </strong>Blinding of patients was not feasible. Only blinding the assessor for patient satisfaction was achieved.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cast measurements remained relatively stable from T1 to T6, with no significant difference attributed to the retainer type (RT or RB). Time significantly affected all cast measurements except for the irregularity index. There was no significant correlation between retainer type or time and satisfaction questionnaire responses, although the responses varied by question. No harms were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both RT and RB wire retainers effectively maintain mandibular arch alignment and are equally well tolerated by patients in the medium term.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of orthodontics\",\"volume\":\"47 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjaf013\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjaf013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估和比较两种固定固位体(3股圆扭固位(RT)和8股矩形编织固位(RB))对下颌前牙弓尺寸的稳定性和患者满意度。试验设计:两组平行、双中心前瞻性随机对照试验。方法:纳入133例正畸患者(中位年龄24.6岁,第25百分位= 17.2岁,第75百分位= 32.4岁)。干预措施:这些患者按1:1的比例随机分配接受RT或RB固定器。随机化:使用大小为4,6或8的随机排列块来实现,这些块隐藏在顺序编号的,不透明的密封信封中。结果:主要结果为不规则指数的变化,次要结果包括弓长;齿间,释臼齿和齿间宽度;以及病人的满意度。在基线以及固位器放置后3、6、12、18和24个月进行评估。采用随机效应线性回归分析铸型测量值,并在每个时间点评估满意度。盲法:不能对患者进行盲法。仅使评估员对患者满意度盲目。结果:从T1到T6,铸型测量保持相对稳定,固位器类型(RT或RB)没有显著差异。除了不规则指数外,时间对所有铸型测量都有显著影响。保留器类型或时间与满意度问卷的回答之间没有显著的相关性,尽管回答因问题而异。没有观察到危害。结论:RT和RB金属丝固位器均能有效维持下颌弓直线,患者在中期均具有良好的耐受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative assessment of stability and satisfaction between two mandibular lingual retainers in orthodontic patients. A 2-year follow-up, single practice-based randomized trial.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the stability of mandibular dental arch dimensions and patient satisfaction between two types of fixed retainers-3-strand round twisted (RT) and 8-strand rectangular braided (RB)-both of which are bonded to all six anterior mandibular teeth.

Trial design: 2-arm parallel, two-center prospective randomized controlled trial.

Methods: participants: 133 orthodontic patients (median age 24.6 years, 25th percentile = 17.2 years, 75th percentile = 32.4 years) were recruited.

Interventions: These patients were randomly assigned to receive either an RT or RB wire retainer at a 1:1 ratio.

Randomization: It was achieved using random permuted blocks of sizes 4, 6, or 8, which were concealed in sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes.

Outcomes: The primary outcome was the change in the irregularity index, with secondary outcomes including arch length; intercanine, interpremolar, and intermolar widths; and patient satisfaction. Evaluations were performed at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after retainer placement. Dental cast measurements were analyzed using random effects linear regression, and satisfaction was assessed at each time point.

Blinding: Blinding of patients was not feasible. Only blinding the assessor for patient satisfaction was achieved.

Results: Cast measurements remained relatively stable from T1 to T6, with no significant difference attributed to the retainer type (RT or RB). Time significantly affected all cast measurements except for the irregularity index. There was no significant correlation between retainer type or time and satisfaction questionnaire responses, although the responses varied by question. No harms were observed.

Conclusions: Both RT and RB wire retainers effectively maintain mandibular arch alignment and are equally well tolerated by patients in the medium term.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European journal of orthodontics
European journal of orthodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
71
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Orthodontics publishes papers of excellence on all aspects of orthodontics including craniofacial development and growth. The emphasis of the journal is on full research papers. Succinct and carefully prepared papers are favoured in terms of impact as well as readability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信