开发和验证机器学习模型,预测急性上消化道出血患者的止血干预。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Kajornvit Raghareutai, Watcharaporn Tanchotsrinon, Onuma Sattayalertyanyong, Uayporn Kaosombatwattana
{"title":"开发和验证机器学习模型,预测急性上消化道出血患者的止血干预。","authors":"Kajornvit Raghareutai, Watcharaporn Tanchotsrinon, Onuma Sattayalertyanyong, Uayporn Kaosombatwattana","doi":"10.1186/s12911-025-02969-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is common in clinical practice and has a wide range of severity. Along with medical therapy, endoscopic intervention is the mainstay treatment for hemostasis in high-risk rebleeding lesions. Predicting the need for endoscopic intervention would be beneficial in resource-limited areas for selective referral to an endoscopic center. The proposed risk stratification scores had limited accuracy. We developed a machine learning model to predict the need for endoscopic intervention in patients with acute UGIB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospectively collected database of UGIB patients from 2011 to 2020 was retrospectively reviewed. Patients older than 18 years diagnosed with UGIB who underwent endoscopy were included. Data comprised demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, and laboratory parameters. The cleaned data was used for model development and validation in Python. We conducted 80%-20% split sample training and test sets. The training set was used for supervised learning of 15 models using a stratified 5-fold cross-validation process. The model with the highest AUROC was then internally validated with the test set to evaluate performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1389 patients, 615 (44.3%) of the cohorts received the endoscopic intervention (293 variceal- and 336 nonvariceal-bleeding interventions). Eighteen features, including demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, and laboratory parameters, were selected as input for 15 machine learning models. The result revealed that the linear discriminant analysis model could achieve the highest AUROC of 0.74 to predict endoscopic intervention. The model was validated with the test set, in which the AUROC was increased from 0.74 to 0.81. Finally, the model was deployed as a web application by Streamlit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our machine learning model can identify patients with acute UGIB who need endoscopic intervention with good performance. This may help primary care physicians prioritize patients who need referrals and optimize resource allocation in resource-limited areas. Further development and identification of more specific features might improve prediction performance.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>None (Retrospective cohort study) PATIENT & PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: None.</p>","PeriodicalId":9340,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","volume":"25 1","pages":"145"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11934503/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of a machine learning model to predict hemostatic intervention in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.\",\"authors\":\"Kajornvit Raghareutai, Watcharaporn Tanchotsrinon, Onuma Sattayalertyanyong, Uayporn Kaosombatwattana\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12911-025-02969-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is common in clinical practice and has a wide range of severity. Along with medical therapy, endoscopic intervention is the mainstay treatment for hemostasis in high-risk rebleeding lesions. Predicting the need for endoscopic intervention would be beneficial in resource-limited areas for selective referral to an endoscopic center. The proposed risk stratification scores had limited accuracy. We developed a machine learning model to predict the need for endoscopic intervention in patients with acute UGIB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospectively collected database of UGIB patients from 2011 to 2020 was retrospectively reviewed. Patients older than 18 years diagnosed with UGIB who underwent endoscopy were included. Data comprised demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, and laboratory parameters. The cleaned data was used for model development and validation in Python. We conducted 80%-20% split sample training and test sets. The training set was used for supervised learning of 15 models using a stratified 5-fold cross-validation process. The model with the highest AUROC was then internally validated with the test set to evaluate performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1389 patients, 615 (44.3%) of the cohorts received the endoscopic intervention (293 variceal- and 336 nonvariceal-bleeding interventions). Eighteen features, including demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, and laboratory parameters, were selected as input for 15 machine learning models. The result revealed that the linear discriminant analysis model could achieve the highest AUROC of 0.74 to predict endoscopic intervention. The model was validated with the test set, in which the AUROC was increased from 0.74 to 0.81. Finally, the model was deployed as a web application by Streamlit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our machine learning model can identify patients with acute UGIB who need endoscopic intervention with good performance. This may help primary care physicians prioritize patients who need referrals and optimize resource allocation in resource-limited areas. Further development and identification of more specific features might improve prediction performance.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>None (Retrospective cohort study) PATIENT & PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: None.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11934503/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-02969-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-02969-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急性上消化道出血(UGIB)在临床实践中很常见,且严重程度不一。除药物治疗外,内镜介入是高危再出血病变止血的主要治疗方法。预测内窥镜干预的需要将有利于资源有限的地区选择性转诊到内窥镜中心。提出的风险分层评分的准确性有限。我们开发了一个机器学习模型来预测急性UGIB患者对内镜干预的需求。方法:对前瞻性收集的2011 - 2020年UGIB患者数据库进行回顾性分析。年龄大于18岁的诊断为UGIB的患者接受了内窥镜检查。数据包括人口统计学特征、临床表现和实验室参数。清理后的数据用于在Python中进行模型开发和验证。我们进行了80%-20%的分割样本训练和测试集。该训练集使用分层5倍交叉验证过程对15个模型进行监督学习。然后用测试集内部验证具有最高AUROC的模型以评估性能。结果:在1389例患者中,615例(44.3%)接受了内镜干预(293例静脉曲张出血干预和336例非静脉曲张出血干预)。包括人口统计学特征、临床表现和实验室参数在内的18个特征被选为15个机器学习模型的输入。结果表明,线性判别分析模型预测内镜介入的AUROC最高,为0.74。用测试集对模型进行验证,AUROC由0.74提高到0.81。最后,该模型被Streamlit部署为web应用程序。结论:我们的机器学习模型能够较好地识别出需要内镜干预的急性UGIB患者。这可能有助于初级保健医生优先考虑需要转诊的患者,并在资源有限的地区优化资源分配。进一步开发和识别更具体的特征可能会提高预测性能。试验注册:无(回顾性队列研究)患者和公众参与:无。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and validation of a machine learning model to predict hemostatic intervention in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Background: Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is common in clinical practice and has a wide range of severity. Along with medical therapy, endoscopic intervention is the mainstay treatment for hemostasis in high-risk rebleeding lesions. Predicting the need for endoscopic intervention would be beneficial in resource-limited areas for selective referral to an endoscopic center. The proposed risk stratification scores had limited accuracy. We developed a machine learning model to predict the need for endoscopic intervention in patients with acute UGIB.

Methods: A prospectively collected database of UGIB patients from 2011 to 2020 was retrospectively reviewed. Patients older than 18 years diagnosed with UGIB who underwent endoscopy were included. Data comprised demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, and laboratory parameters. The cleaned data was used for model development and validation in Python. We conducted 80%-20% split sample training and test sets. The training set was used for supervised learning of 15 models using a stratified 5-fold cross-validation process. The model with the highest AUROC was then internally validated with the test set to evaluate performance.

Results: Of 1389 patients, 615 (44.3%) of the cohorts received the endoscopic intervention (293 variceal- and 336 nonvariceal-bleeding interventions). Eighteen features, including demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, and laboratory parameters, were selected as input for 15 machine learning models. The result revealed that the linear discriminant analysis model could achieve the highest AUROC of 0.74 to predict endoscopic intervention. The model was validated with the test set, in which the AUROC was increased from 0.74 to 0.81. Finally, the model was deployed as a web application by Streamlit.

Conclusions: Our machine learning model can identify patients with acute UGIB who need endoscopic intervention with good performance. This may help primary care physicians prioritize patients who need referrals and optimize resource allocation in resource-limited areas. Further development and identification of more specific features might improve prediction performance.

Trial registration: None (Retrospective cohort study) PATIENT & PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: None.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信