糖尿病足溃疡患者健康素养水平及对补充和替代医学实践态度的调查:描述性和相关性研究

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Fatma Aslan, Betül Tosun, Aynur Koyuncu, Ayla Yava
{"title":"糖尿病足溃疡患者健康素养水平及对补充和替代医学实践态度的调查:描述性和相关性研究","authors":"Fatma Aslan, Betül Tosun, Aynur Koyuncu, Ayla Yava","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to examine the health literacy levels and attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) practices among patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) as well as to explore the relationship between these variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive and correlational study involved 150 patients diagnosed with DFUs who were receiving treatment at the endocrinology clinic of a university hospital in Turkey. Data collection tools included a demographic information form, the health literacy scale (HLS), and the complementary, alternative, and conventional medicine attitude scale (CACMAS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of participants was 58.7 ± 9.6 years, with 58.7% being male. Approximately 11.5% had been living with diabetes for approximately 10 years, 88.7% had heard of CAM methods, and 40% had tried these methods for their feet. Among those who tried CAM methods, 66.7% reported them as ineffective. Significant differences in both HLS and CACMAS scores were found based on age, sex, education level, income, place of residence, duration of diabetes diagnosis, previous nonmedical treatments for the foot, and the perceived benefits or side effects of these treatments (P < .05). Higher health literacy levels were associated with a lower tendency to use CAM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights significant variations in HLS and CACMAS scores among DFU patients based on specific demographic factors. As health literacy levels increased, the propensity to use CAM decreased. Therefore, it is recommended to enhance patients' access to reliable and current information about CAM practices. Communication with patients should be open and empathetic, addressing their concerns and preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":7571,"journal":{"name":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examination of the Health Literacy Level and Attitudes Toward Complementary and Alternative Medicine Practices Among Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Descriptive and Correlational Study.\",\"authors\":\"Fatma Aslan, Betül Tosun, Aynur Koyuncu, Ayla Yava\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to examine the health literacy levels and attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) practices among patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) as well as to explore the relationship between these variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive and correlational study involved 150 patients diagnosed with DFUs who were receiving treatment at the endocrinology clinic of a university hospital in Turkey. Data collection tools included a demographic information form, the health literacy scale (HLS), and the complementary, alternative, and conventional medicine attitude scale (CACMAS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of participants was 58.7 ± 9.6 years, with 58.7% being male. Approximately 11.5% had been living with diabetes for approximately 10 years, 88.7% had heard of CAM methods, and 40% had tried these methods for their feet. Among those who tried CAM methods, 66.7% reported them as ineffective. Significant differences in both HLS and CACMAS scores were found based on age, sex, education level, income, place of residence, duration of diabetes diagnosis, previous nonmedical treatments for the foot, and the perceived benefits or side effects of these treatments (P < .05). Higher health literacy levels were associated with a lower tendency to use CAM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights significant variations in HLS and CACMAS scores among DFU patients based on specific demographic factors. As health literacy levels increased, the propensity to use CAM decreased. Therefore, it is recommended to enhance patients' access to reliable and current information about CAM practices. Communication with patients should be open and empathetic, addressing their concerns and preferences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alternative therapies in health and medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alternative therapies in health and medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在了解糖尿病足溃疡(DFUs)患者的健康素养水平和对补充替代医学(CAM)的态度,并探讨这些变量之间的关系。方法:这项描述性和相关性研究涉及150例诊断为DFUs的患者,他们在土耳其一所大学医院的内分泌科诊所接受治疗。数据收集工具包括人口统计信息表、健康素养量表(HLS)和补充、替代和传统医学态度量表(CACMAS)。结果:参与者平均年龄58.7±9.6岁,男性占58.7%。大约11.5%的人患有糖尿病大约10年,88.7%的人听说过CAM方法,40%的人尝试过这些方法。在尝试CAM方法的人中,66.7%的人认为无效。HLS和CACMAS评分在年龄、性别、教育水平、收入、居住地、糖尿病诊断时间、既往非药物足部治疗以及这些治疗的获益或副作用方面存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。较高的健康素养水平与较低的辅助医学使用倾向相关。结论:本研究强调了基于特定人口统计学因素的DFU患者HLS和CACMAS评分的显著差异。随着健康素养水平的提高,使用辅助医学的倾向降低。因此,建议加强患者获得可靠的和最新的信息,有关替代医学做法。与患者的沟通应该是开放和感同身受的,解决他们的担忧和偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examination of the Health Literacy Level and Attitudes Toward Complementary and Alternative Medicine Practices Among Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Descriptive and Correlational Study.

Objective: This study aimed to examine the health literacy levels and attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) practices among patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) as well as to explore the relationship between these variables.

Methods: This descriptive and correlational study involved 150 patients diagnosed with DFUs who were receiving treatment at the endocrinology clinic of a university hospital in Turkey. Data collection tools included a demographic information form, the health literacy scale (HLS), and the complementary, alternative, and conventional medicine attitude scale (CACMAS).

Results: The mean age of participants was 58.7 ± 9.6 years, with 58.7% being male. Approximately 11.5% had been living with diabetes for approximately 10 years, 88.7% had heard of CAM methods, and 40% had tried these methods for their feet. Among those who tried CAM methods, 66.7% reported them as ineffective. Significant differences in both HLS and CACMAS scores were found based on age, sex, education level, income, place of residence, duration of diabetes diagnosis, previous nonmedical treatments for the foot, and the perceived benefits or side effects of these treatments (P < .05). Higher health literacy levels were associated with a lower tendency to use CAM.

Conclusion: This study highlights significant variations in HLS and CACMAS scores among DFU patients based on specific demographic factors. As health literacy levels increased, the propensity to use CAM decreased. Therefore, it is recommended to enhance patients' access to reliable and current information about CAM practices. Communication with patients should be open and empathetic, addressing their concerns and preferences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Alternative therapies in health and medicine
Alternative therapies in health and medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
219
期刊介绍: Launched in 1995, Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine has a mission to promote the art and science of integrative medicine and a responsibility to improve public health. We strive to maintain the highest standards of ethical medical journalism independent of special interests that is timely, accurate, and a pleasure to read. We publish original, peer-reviewed scientific articles that provide health care providers with continuing education to promote health, prevent illness, and treat disease. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine was the first journal in this field to be indexed in the National Library of Medicine. In 2006, 2007, and 2008, ATHM had the highest impact factor ranking of any independently published peer-reviewed CAM journal in the United States—meaning that its research articles were cited more frequently than any other journal’s in the field. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine does not endorse any particular system or method but promotes the evaluation and appropriate use of all effective therapeutic approaches. Each issue contains a variety of disciplined inquiry methods, from case reports to original scientific research to systematic reviews. The editors encourage the integration of evidence-based emerging therapies with conventional medical practices by licensed health care providers in a way that promotes a comprehensive approach to health care that is focused on wellness, prevention, and healing. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine hopes to inform all licensed health care practitioners about developments in fields other than their own and to foster an ongoing debate about the scientific, clinical, historical, legal, political, and cultural issues that affect all of health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信