建立生物链接评估方案:凝胶和胶原蛋白在潜在体外肠道模型生物打印中的应用。

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Mariangela Rea, Luana Di Lisa, Giorgia Pagnotta, Nunzia Gallo, Luca Salvatore, Federica D'Amico, Noelia Campilio, José Manuel Baena, Juan Antonio Marchal, Arrigo F G Cicero, Claudio Borghi, Maria Letizia Focarete
{"title":"建立生物链接评估方案:凝胶和胶原蛋白在潜在体外肠道模型生物打印中的应用。","authors":"Mariangela Rea, Luana Di Lisa, Giorgia Pagnotta, Nunzia Gallo, Luca Salvatore, Federica D'Amico, Noelia Campilio, José Manuel Baena, Juan Antonio Marchal, Arrigo F G Cicero, Claudio Borghi, Maria Letizia Focarete","doi":"10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5c00034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Collagen and gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) are widely studied biomaterials for extrusion-based bioprinting (EBB) due to their excellent biological properties and ability to mimic the extracellular matrix of native tissues. This study aims to establish a preliminary workflow for approaching EBB by assessing collagen and GelMA printability and biological performance. GelMA was selected for its cost-effectiveness and ease of synthesis, while our collagen formulation was specifically optimized for printability, which is a challenging aspect of bioprinting. A parallel evaluation of their printability and biological performance is provided to develop a preliminary 3D intestinal model replicating the submucosa, lamina propria, and epithelial layer. Rheological analyses demonstrated that both materials exhibit a shear-thinning behavior. Collagen (u-CI) displayed a shear-thinning parameter <i>p</i> = 0.1 and a consistency index <i>C</i> = 80.62 Pa·s, while GelMA (u-GI) exhibited a more pronounced shear-thinning effect and enhanced shape retention (<i>p</i> = 0.06, <i>C</i> = 286.6 Pa·s). Post-extrusion recovery was higher for collagen (85%), compared to GelMA (45%), indicating its greater mechanical resilience. Photo-crosslinking improved hydrogel stability, with an increase in storage modulus <i>G</i>' for both materials. Printing tests confirmed the suitability of both hydrogels for bioprinting, with GelMA demonstrating higher print fidelity than collagen. Dimensional stability assessments under incubating conditions revealed that collagen constructs maintained their shape for 14 days before degradation, whereas GelMA constructs exhibited a gradual decrease in diameter over 21 days. Cell culture studies showed that human skin fibroblasts (HSFs) and human colon adenocarcinoma cells (HCT-8) could be successfully cocultured in an optimized RPMI 1640-based medium. AlamarBlue assays and Live/Dead staining confirmed high cell viability and proliferation within both hydrogel matrices. Notably, HSFs in GelMA exhibited more elongated morphologies, likely due to the material's lower stiffness (380 Pa) compared to collagen (585 Pa). HCT-8 cells adhered more rapidly to GelMA constructs, forming colonies within 7 days, whereas on collagen, colony formation was delayed to 14 days. Finally, a layered intestinal model was fabricated, and immunostaining confirmed the expression of tight junction (ZO-1) and adhesion (E-cadherin) proteins, validating the epithelial monolayer integrity. These findings highlight the potential of collagen and GelMA in 3D bioprinting applications for gut tissue engineering and pave the way for future developments of <i>in vitro</i> intestinal models.</p>","PeriodicalId":8,"journal":{"name":"ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering","volume":" ","pages":"2456-2467"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12001187/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishing a Bioink Assessment Protocol: GelMA and Collagen in the Bioprinting of a Potential <i>In Vitro</i> Intestinal Model.\",\"authors\":\"Mariangela Rea, Luana Di Lisa, Giorgia Pagnotta, Nunzia Gallo, Luca Salvatore, Federica D'Amico, Noelia Campilio, José Manuel Baena, Juan Antonio Marchal, Arrigo F G Cicero, Claudio Borghi, Maria Letizia Focarete\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5c00034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Collagen and gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) are widely studied biomaterials for extrusion-based bioprinting (EBB) due to their excellent biological properties and ability to mimic the extracellular matrix of native tissues. This study aims to establish a preliminary workflow for approaching EBB by assessing collagen and GelMA printability and biological performance. GelMA was selected for its cost-effectiveness and ease of synthesis, while our collagen formulation was specifically optimized for printability, which is a challenging aspect of bioprinting. A parallel evaluation of their printability and biological performance is provided to develop a preliminary 3D intestinal model replicating the submucosa, lamina propria, and epithelial layer. Rheological analyses demonstrated that both materials exhibit a shear-thinning behavior. Collagen (u-CI) displayed a shear-thinning parameter <i>p</i> = 0.1 and a consistency index <i>C</i> = 80.62 Pa·s, while GelMA (u-GI) exhibited a more pronounced shear-thinning effect and enhanced shape retention (<i>p</i> = 0.06, <i>C</i> = 286.6 Pa·s). Post-extrusion recovery was higher for collagen (85%), compared to GelMA (45%), indicating its greater mechanical resilience. Photo-crosslinking improved hydrogel stability, with an increase in storage modulus <i>G</i>' for both materials. Printing tests confirmed the suitability of both hydrogels for bioprinting, with GelMA demonstrating higher print fidelity than collagen. Dimensional stability assessments under incubating conditions revealed that collagen constructs maintained their shape for 14 days before degradation, whereas GelMA constructs exhibited a gradual decrease in diameter over 21 days. Cell culture studies showed that human skin fibroblasts (HSFs) and human colon adenocarcinoma cells (HCT-8) could be successfully cocultured in an optimized RPMI 1640-based medium. AlamarBlue assays and Live/Dead staining confirmed high cell viability and proliferation within both hydrogel matrices. Notably, HSFs in GelMA exhibited more elongated morphologies, likely due to the material's lower stiffness (380 Pa) compared to collagen (585 Pa). HCT-8 cells adhered more rapidly to GelMA constructs, forming colonies within 7 days, whereas on collagen, colony formation was delayed to 14 days. Finally, a layered intestinal model was fabricated, and immunostaining confirmed the expression of tight junction (ZO-1) and adhesion (E-cadherin) proteins, validating the epithelial monolayer integrity. These findings highlight the potential of collagen and GelMA in 3D bioprinting applications for gut tissue engineering and pave the way for future developments of <i>in vitro</i> intestinal models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2456-2467\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12001187/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5c00034\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5c00034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胶原蛋白和明胶甲基丙烯酰(GelMA)由于其优异的生物学特性和模拟原生组织细胞外基质的能力,被广泛研究用于挤压生物打印(EBB)的生物材料。本研究旨在通过评估胶原蛋白和GelMA的可打印性和生物学性能,建立一个初步的接近EBB的工作流程。GelMA因其成本效益和易于合成而被选中,而我们的胶原蛋白配方则针对可打印性进行了专门优化,这是生物打印的一个具有挑战性的方面。通过对其可打印性和生物学性能的平行评估,建立了一个复制粘膜下层、固有层和上皮层的初步3D肠道模型。流变分析表明,这两种材料都表现出剪切变薄的行为。胶原蛋白(u-CI)的剪切变薄参数p = 0.1,一致性指数C = 80.62 Pa·s,而GelMA (u-GI)的剪切变薄效果更明显,形状保持力更强(p = 0.06, C = 286.6 Pa·s)。与GelMA(45%)相比,胶原蛋白(85%)的挤压后恢复更高,表明其具有更大的机械弹性。光交联提高了水凝胶的稳定性,增加了两种材料的存储模量G'。打印测试证实了这两种水凝胶对生物打印的适用性,GelMA显示出比胶原蛋白更高的打印保真度。在培养条件下的尺寸稳定性评估显示,胶原结构在降解前保持其形状14天,而GelMA结构的直径在21天内逐渐减小。细胞培养研究表明,人皮肤成纤维细胞(hsf)和人结肠腺癌细胞(HCT-8)可以在优化的RPMI 1640培养基中成功共培养。AlamarBlue实验和活/死染色证实了两种水凝胶基质中细胞的高活力和增殖。值得注意的是,GelMA中的hsf表现出更长的形态,可能是由于材料的刚度(380 Pa)低于胶原蛋白(585 Pa)。HCT-8细胞在GelMA构建物上的粘附速度更快,在7天内形成集落,而在胶原上,集落形成延迟到14天。最后,制作成层状肠道模型,免疫染色证实了紧密连接(ZO-1)和粘附(E-cadherin)蛋白的表达,验证了上皮单层的完整性。这些发现突出了胶原蛋白和凝胶蛋白在肠道组织工程3D生物打印应用中的潜力,并为体外肠道模型的未来发展铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Establishing a Bioink Assessment Protocol: GelMA and Collagen in the Bioprinting of a Potential In Vitro Intestinal Model.

Collagen and gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) are widely studied biomaterials for extrusion-based bioprinting (EBB) due to their excellent biological properties and ability to mimic the extracellular matrix of native tissues. This study aims to establish a preliminary workflow for approaching EBB by assessing collagen and GelMA printability and biological performance. GelMA was selected for its cost-effectiveness and ease of synthesis, while our collagen formulation was specifically optimized for printability, which is a challenging aspect of bioprinting. A parallel evaluation of their printability and biological performance is provided to develop a preliminary 3D intestinal model replicating the submucosa, lamina propria, and epithelial layer. Rheological analyses demonstrated that both materials exhibit a shear-thinning behavior. Collagen (u-CI) displayed a shear-thinning parameter p = 0.1 and a consistency index C = 80.62 Pa·s, while GelMA (u-GI) exhibited a more pronounced shear-thinning effect and enhanced shape retention (p = 0.06, C = 286.6 Pa·s). Post-extrusion recovery was higher for collagen (85%), compared to GelMA (45%), indicating its greater mechanical resilience. Photo-crosslinking improved hydrogel stability, with an increase in storage modulus G' for both materials. Printing tests confirmed the suitability of both hydrogels for bioprinting, with GelMA demonstrating higher print fidelity than collagen. Dimensional stability assessments under incubating conditions revealed that collagen constructs maintained their shape for 14 days before degradation, whereas GelMA constructs exhibited a gradual decrease in diameter over 21 days. Cell culture studies showed that human skin fibroblasts (HSFs) and human colon adenocarcinoma cells (HCT-8) could be successfully cocultured in an optimized RPMI 1640-based medium. AlamarBlue assays and Live/Dead staining confirmed high cell viability and proliferation within both hydrogel matrices. Notably, HSFs in GelMA exhibited more elongated morphologies, likely due to the material's lower stiffness (380 Pa) compared to collagen (585 Pa). HCT-8 cells adhered more rapidly to GelMA constructs, forming colonies within 7 days, whereas on collagen, colony formation was delayed to 14 days. Finally, a layered intestinal model was fabricated, and immunostaining confirmed the expression of tight junction (ZO-1) and adhesion (E-cadherin) proteins, validating the epithelial monolayer integrity. These findings highlight the potential of collagen and GelMA in 3D bioprinting applications for gut tissue engineering and pave the way for future developments of in vitro intestinal models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering Materials Science-Biomaterials
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
413
期刊介绍: ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering is the leading journal in the field of biomaterials, serving as an international forum for publishing cutting-edge research and innovative ideas on a broad range of topics: Applications and Health – implantable tissues and devices, prosthesis, health risks, toxicology Bio-interactions and Bio-compatibility – material-biology interactions, chemical/morphological/structural communication, mechanobiology, signaling and biological responses, immuno-engineering, calcification, coatings, corrosion and degradation of biomaterials and devices, biophysical regulation of cell functions Characterization, Synthesis, and Modification – new biomaterials, bioinspired and biomimetic approaches to biomaterials, exploiting structural hierarchy and architectural control, combinatorial strategies for biomaterials discovery, genetic biomaterials design, synthetic biology, new composite systems, bionics, polymer synthesis Controlled Release and Delivery Systems – biomaterial-based drug and gene delivery, bio-responsive delivery of regulatory molecules, pharmaceutical engineering Healthcare Advances – clinical translation, regulatory issues, patient safety, emerging trends Imaging and Diagnostics – imaging agents and probes, theranostics, biosensors, monitoring Manufacturing and Technology – 3D printing, inks, organ-on-a-chip, bioreactor/perfusion systems, microdevices, BioMEMS, optics and electronics interfaces with biomaterials, systems integration Modeling and Informatics Tools – scaling methods to guide biomaterial design, predictive algorithms for structure-function, biomechanics, integrating bioinformatics with biomaterials discovery, metabolomics in the context of biomaterials Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine – basic and applied studies, cell therapies, scaffolds, vascularization, bioartificial organs, transplantation and functionality, cellular agriculture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信