Tom Kroon, Amir Fattahi, Francesco Dalla Longa, J. Chris Slootweg and Bob van der Zwaan
{"title":"绿色能源载体运输的成本比较与定性分析","authors":"Tom Kroon, Amir Fattahi, Francesco Dalla Longa, J. Chris Slootweg and Bob van der Zwaan","doi":"10.1039/D4SE00959B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Green energy carriers play a pivotal role in the transition towards the pervasive use of variable renewable electricity, as they allow for efficient storage, transportation, and utilization of excess electricity generated in specific regions and/or over different time frames. In this paper, we analyze the cost-optimality of transporting eight liquid or gaseous green energy carriers, including H<small><sub>2</sub></small>, <em>via</em> pipelines and shipping, over distances from 250 to 3000 km. To provide a more comprehensive deployability evaluation beyond purely cost-based criteria, we introduce several novel concepts that allow comparing green energy carriers on the basis of safety, applicability, and end-use characteristics. Our study reveals that H<small><sub>2</sub></small> exhibits significantly higher costs compared to other energy carriers across both transportation modes. For a pipeline and shipping distance of 250 km, we calculate H<small><sub>2</sub></small> transportation costs of 1.4 and 8.1 m€ per PJ, respectively, while for alternative carriers costs range from 0.1 to 0.7 and 0.2 to 3.1 m€ per PJ. For a distance of 3000 km, H<small><sub>2</sub></small> transportation costs through pipeline and shipping are estimated at 18.6 and 10.3 m€ per PJ, respectively, whereas for alternative carriers the cost ranges from 1.2 to 7.6 and 0.3 to 4.0 m€ per PJ. An integration of additional selection criteria, however, implies that the practical deployability differs significantly across different green energy carriers, and that no one-to-one relationship exists between deployability and transportation costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":104,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Energy & Fuels","volume":" 7","pages":" 1773-1785"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2025/se/d4se00959b?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative cost and qualitative analysis for the transportation of green energy carriers†\",\"authors\":\"Tom Kroon, Amir Fattahi, Francesco Dalla Longa, J. Chris Slootweg and Bob van der Zwaan\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D4SE00959B\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Green energy carriers play a pivotal role in the transition towards the pervasive use of variable renewable electricity, as they allow for efficient storage, transportation, and utilization of excess electricity generated in specific regions and/or over different time frames. In this paper, we analyze the cost-optimality of transporting eight liquid or gaseous green energy carriers, including H<small><sub>2</sub></small>, <em>via</em> pipelines and shipping, over distances from 250 to 3000 km. To provide a more comprehensive deployability evaluation beyond purely cost-based criteria, we introduce several novel concepts that allow comparing green energy carriers on the basis of safety, applicability, and end-use characteristics. Our study reveals that H<small><sub>2</sub></small> exhibits significantly higher costs compared to other energy carriers across both transportation modes. For a pipeline and shipping distance of 250 km, we calculate H<small><sub>2</sub></small> transportation costs of 1.4 and 8.1 m€ per PJ, respectively, while for alternative carriers costs range from 0.1 to 0.7 and 0.2 to 3.1 m€ per PJ. For a distance of 3000 km, H<small><sub>2</sub></small> transportation costs through pipeline and shipping are estimated at 18.6 and 10.3 m€ per PJ, respectively, whereas for alternative carriers the cost ranges from 1.2 to 7.6 and 0.3 to 4.0 m€ per PJ. An integration of additional selection criteria, however, implies that the practical deployability differs significantly across different green energy carriers, and that no one-to-one relationship exists between deployability and transportation costs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Energy & Fuels\",\"volume\":\" 7\",\"pages\":\" 1773-1785\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2025/se/d4se00959b?page=search\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Energy & Fuels\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/se/d4se00959b\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Energy & Fuels","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/se/d4se00959b","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
A comparative cost and qualitative analysis for the transportation of green energy carriers†
Green energy carriers play a pivotal role in the transition towards the pervasive use of variable renewable electricity, as they allow for efficient storage, transportation, and utilization of excess electricity generated in specific regions and/or over different time frames. In this paper, we analyze the cost-optimality of transporting eight liquid or gaseous green energy carriers, including H2, via pipelines and shipping, over distances from 250 to 3000 km. To provide a more comprehensive deployability evaluation beyond purely cost-based criteria, we introduce several novel concepts that allow comparing green energy carriers on the basis of safety, applicability, and end-use characteristics. Our study reveals that H2 exhibits significantly higher costs compared to other energy carriers across both transportation modes. For a pipeline and shipping distance of 250 km, we calculate H2 transportation costs of 1.4 and 8.1 m€ per PJ, respectively, while for alternative carriers costs range from 0.1 to 0.7 and 0.2 to 3.1 m€ per PJ. For a distance of 3000 km, H2 transportation costs through pipeline and shipping are estimated at 18.6 and 10.3 m€ per PJ, respectively, whereas for alternative carriers the cost ranges from 1.2 to 7.6 and 0.3 to 4.0 m€ per PJ. An integration of additional selection criteria, however, implies that the practical deployability differs significantly across different green energy carriers, and that no one-to-one relationship exists between deployability and transportation costs.
期刊介绍:
Sustainable Energy & Fuels will publish research that contributes to the development of sustainable energy technologies with a particular emphasis on new and next-generation technologies.