揭示Chat-GPT 4.0的有效性,这是一种人工智能会话工具,用于解决胃肠道内窥镜检查中常见的患者问题

iGIE Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.igie.2025.01.012
Giulio Calabrese MD , Roberta Maselli MD, PhD , Marcello Maida MD , Federico Barbaro MD, PhD , Rui Morais MD , Olga Maria Nardone MD, PhD , Emanuele Sinagra MD, PhD , Roberto Di Mitri MD , Sandro Sferrazza MD
{"title":"揭示Chat-GPT 4.0的有效性,这是一种人工智能会话工具,用于解决胃肠道内窥镜检查中常见的患者问题","authors":"Giulio Calabrese MD ,&nbsp;Roberta Maselli MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Marcello Maida MD ,&nbsp;Federico Barbaro MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Rui Morais MD ,&nbsp;Olga Maria Nardone MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Emanuele Sinagra MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Roberto Di Mitri MD ,&nbsp;Sandro Sferrazza MD","doi":"10.1016/j.igie.2025.01.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (Chat-GPT) has proven effective in addressing patient inquiries related to gastrointestinal (GI) disease. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and reliability of Chat-GPT in answering common patients’ queries on GI endoscopy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eighteen selected patients’ queries regarding GI endoscopy were rated on a Likert-type scale by 10 health professionals and 2 non-health professionals on the following features: reliability (1-6), accuracy (1-3), and comprehensibility (1-3).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean reliability, accuracy, and comprehensibility values were 5.2 ± 1.7, 2.7 ± 0.4, and 2.9 ± 0.2, respectively. Overall, most answers were rated as having a solid level of reliability (94.4%) and accuracy (100%) and fair levels of comprehensibility (61.1%). The physicians considered the tool to be adequate for addressing questions related to clinical practice, except for inquiries regarding bowel prep solutions, medications, and pacemaker management.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Chat-GPT 4.0 demonstrated effectiveness in providing patients with informative content about GI endoscopy, even though health professional support remains essential for a comprehensive approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100652,"journal":{"name":"iGIE","volume":"4 1","pages":"Pages 21-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unveiling the effectiveness of Chat-GPT 4.0, an artificial intelligence conversational tool, for addressing common patient queries in gastrointestinal endoscopy\",\"authors\":\"Giulio Calabrese MD ,&nbsp;Roberta Maselli MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Marcello Maida MD ,&nbsp;Federico Barbaro MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Rui Morais MD ,&nbsp;Olga Maria Nardone MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Emanuele Sinagra MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Roberto Di Mitri MD ,&nbsp;Sandro Sferrazza MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.igie.2025.01.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (Chat-GPT) has proven effective in addressing patient inquiries related to gastrointestinal (GI) disease. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and reliability of Chat-GPT in answering common patients’ queries on GI endoscopy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eighteen selected patients’ queries regarding GI endoscopy were rated on a Likert-type scale by 10 health professionals and 2 non-health professionals on the following features: reliability (1-6), accuracy (1-3), and comprehensibility (1-3).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean reliability, accuracy, and comprehensibility values were 5.2 ± 1.7, 2.7 ± 0.4, and 2.9 ± 0.2, respectively. Overall, most answers were rated as having a solid level of reliability (94.4%) and accuracy (100%) and fair levels of comprehensibility (61.1%). The physicians considered the tool to be adequate for addressing questions related to clinical practice, except for inquiries regarding bowel prep solutions, medications, and pacemaker management.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Chat-GPT 4.0 demonstrated effectiveness in providing patients with informative content about GI endoscopy, even though health professional support remains essential for a comprehensive approach.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"iGIE\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 21-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"iGIE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949708625000123\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iGIE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949708625000123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生成预训练变压器(Chat-GPT)已被证明在解决与胃肠道(GI)疾病相关的患者询问方面是有效的。我们的目的是评估Chat-GPT在回答常见患者对胃肠道内镜检查的询问方面的有效性和可靠性。方法选取18例患者,由10名卫生专业人员和2名非卫生专业人员对其胃肠内镜检查的问询进行李克特式评分,对问询的信度(1-6)、准确性(1-3)和可理解性(1-3)进行评分。结果信度、准确度和可理解性平均值分别为5.2±1.7、2.7±0.4和2.9±0.2。总体而言,大多数答案被评为具有可靠的可靠性(94.4%)和准确性(100%)以及可理解性(61.1%)。医生认为该工具足以解决与临床实践相关的问题,除了有关肠道准备溶液、药物和起搏器管理的问题。结论schat - gpt 4.0在为患者提供胃肠道内窥镜检查的信息内容方面显示出有效性,尽管健康专业支持仍然是全面方法的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unveiling the effectiveness of Chat-GPT 4.0, an artificial intelligence conversational tool, for addressing common patient queries in gastrointestinal endoscopy

Background and Aims

Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (Chat-GPT) has proven effective in addressing patient inquiries related to gastrointestinal (GI) disease. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and reliability of Chat-GPT in answering common patients’ queries on GI endoscopy.

Methods

Eighteen selected patients’ queries regarding GI endoscopy were rated on a Likert-type scale by 10 health professionals and 2 non-health professionals on the following features: reliability (1-6), accuracy (1-3), and comprehensibility (1-3).

Results

The mean reliability, accuracy, and comprehensibility values were 5.2 ± 1.7, 2.7 ± 0.4, and 2.9 ± 0.2, respectively. Overall, most answers were rated as having a solid level of reliability (94.4%) and accuracy (100%) and fair levels of comprehensibility (61.1%). The physicians considered the tool to be adequate for addressing questions related to clinical practice, except for inquiries regarding bowel prep solutions, medications, and pacemaker management.

Conclusions

Chat-GPT 4.0 demonstrated effectiveness in providing patients with informative content about GI endoscopy, even though health professional support remains essential for a comprehensive approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信