{"title":"全尺寸AASHTO型I型不锈钢预应力梁的受弯性能","authors":"Abdelmounaim Mechaala , Damian Stefaniuk , Abdeldjelil Belarbi","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Stainless steel is becoming a promising alternative for bridge construction to combat corrosion compared to other corrosion-resistant materials. Due to the limited ultimate strain of High-Strength Stainless Steel (HSSS) strands compared to conventional carbon steel (CS) strands, the yielding observed in CS strands—usually followed by concrete crushing at the extreme compression fiber—may not occur with HSSS strands. For this purpose, this paper provides the results of a study investigating the gap in understanding the flexural behavior of prestressed concrete girders using HSSS strands. Four full-scale 12 m (39.5 ft) long AASHTO Type I girders using the 15.75 mm (0.62 in.) duplex 2205 HSSS strands were designed, fabricated, and tested under four-point bending. The experimental program considered different variables, such as the number of strands, prestressing levels, and the type of loading applied, including monotonic and fatigue loading. Due to limited ultimate strains in HSSS, the design considered rupture of the strands at ultimate as an economical solution. However, despite design considerations for strand rupture, lower concrete strength (than the specified value) led to two girders exhibiting concrete crushing failure. Nevertheless, all girders demonstrated satisfactory performance, exhibiting significant reserve deflection and adequate strength. The girders experiencing strand rupture showed clear warning signs, such as extensive cracking and significant deflection before failure. This was followed by larger crack openings ultimately due to the rupture of all the strands. An analytical model based on strain compatibility principles was used and validated against experimental data to predict flexural behavior. Furthermore, a numerical model utilizing modified rectangular stress block parameters was employed to assess the nominal moment strength of stainless steel prestressed concrete girders. The results from both models closely matched the experimental findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"333 ","pages":"Article 120160"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flexural behavior of full-scale AASHTO type I girders prestressed with stainless steel strands\",\"authors\":\"Abdelmounaim Mechaala , Damian Stefaniuk , Abdeldjelil Belarbi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Stainless steel is becoming a promising alternative for bridge construction to combat corrosion compared to other corrosion-resistant materials. Due to the limited ultimate strain of High-Strength Stainless Steel (HSSS) strands compared to conventional carbon steel (CS) strands, the yielding observed in CS strands—usually followed by concrete crushing at the extreme compression fiber—may not occur with HSSS strands. For this purpose, this paper provides the results of a study investigating the gap in understanding the flexural behavior of prestressed concrete girders using HSSS strands. Four full-scale 12 m (39.5 ft) long AASHTO Type I girders using the 15.75 mm (0.62 in.) duplex 2205 HSSS strands were designed, fabricated, and tested under four-point bending. The experimental program considered different variables, such as the number of strands, prestressing levels, and the type of loading applied, including monotonic and fatigue loading. Due to limited ultimate strains in HSSS, the design considered rupture of the strands at ultimate as an economical solution. However, despite design considerations for strand rupture, lower concrete strength (than the specified value) led to two girders exhibiting concrete crushing failure. Nevertheless, all girders demonstrated satisfactory performance, exhibiting significant reserve deflection and adequate strength. The girders experiencing strand rupture showed clear warning signs, such as extensive cracking and significant deflection before failure. This was followed by larger crack openings ultimately due to the rupture of all the strands. An analytical model based on strain compatibility principles was used and validated against experimental data to predict flexural behavior. Furthermore, a numerical model utilizing modified rectangular stress block parameters was employed to assess the nominal moment strength of stainless steel prestressed concrete girders. The results from both models closely matched the experimental findings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Structures\",\"volume\":\"333 \",\"pages\":\"Article 120160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625005516\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625005516","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Flexural behavior of full-scale AASHTO type I girders prestressed with stainless steel strands
Stainless steel is becoming a promising alternative for bridge construction to combat corrosion compared to other corrosion-resistant materials. Due to the limited ultimate strain of High-Strength Stainless Steel (HSSS) strands compared to conventional carbon steel (CS) strands, the yielding observed in CS strands—usually followed by concrete crushing at the extreme compression fiber—may not occur with HSSS strands. For this purpose, this paper provides the results of a study investigating the gap in understanding the flexural behavior of prestressed concrete girders using HSSS strands. Four full-scale 12 m (39.5 ft) long AASHTO Type I girders using the 15.75 mm (0.62 in.) duplex 2205 HSSS strands were designed, fabricated, and tested under four-point bending. The experimental program considered different variables, such as the number of strands, prestressing levels, and the type of loading applied, including monotonic and fatigue loading. Due to limited ultimate strains in HSSS, the design considered rupture of the strands at ultimate as an economical solution. However, despite design considerations for strand rupture, lower concrete strength (than the specified value) led to two girders exhibiting concrete crushing failure. Nevertheless, all girders demonstrated satisfactory performance, exhibiting significant reserve deflection and adequate strength. The girders experiencing strand rupture showed clear warning signs, such as extensive cracking and significant deflection before failure. This was followed by larger crack openings ultimately due to the rupture of all the strands. An analytical model based on strain compatibility principles was used and validated against experimental data to predict flexural behavior. Furthermore, a numerical model utilizing modified rectangular stress block parameters was employed to assess the nominal moment strength of stainless steel prestressed concrete girders. The results from both models closely matched the experimental findings.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed.
The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering.
Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels.
Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.