Holly Scothorne , Calli Tzani , Maria Ioannou , David Lester , Lucas Rogers , Thomas James Vaughan Williams , John Synnott , Greta Darmanin Kissaun
{"title":"社交媒体平台是否模糊了强制控制与健康关系之间的界限?一项调查强制性控制感知的研究","authors":"Holly Scothorne , Calli Tzani , Maria Ioannou , David Lester , Lucas Rogers , Thomas James Vaughan Williams , John Synnott , Greta Darmanin Kissaun","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study was designed to investigate the relationship between social media (in particular, TikTok) and perceptions of coercive control. Participants viewed seven TikTok videos which involved coercive control and judged them using quantitative questions and open-ended question. The results showed that a moderate negative correlation was observed, indicating that individuals who approved of the behaviour shown in the video held more permissive attitudes toward CC and did not perceive the behaviour as CC, while demographical variables were found to have a non-significant influence on CC perception. Regarding the qualitative aspect of the research, the results showed individuals did not normalise or idolise the behaviour depicted in the videos but instead categorised it as controlling and threatening. The most common theme in relation to what individuals regarded as coercive control was ‘restricting freedoms’ with two subthemes: ‘restricting travel’ and ‘restricting what an individual wears. Interestingly, individuals categorised videos depicting the use of physical violence as abuse and more serious than videos in which physical violence was absent. The present study expands upon previous research, offers directions for future research and highlights the value of education in raising awareness regarding coercive control.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 108649"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are social media platforms blurring the lines between coercive control and healthy relationship? A study investigating perceptions of coercive control\",\"authors\":\"Holly Scothorne , Calli Tzani , Maria Ioannou , David Lester , Lucas Rogers , Thomas James Vaughan Williams , John Synnott , Greta Darmanin Kissaun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108649\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study was designed to investigate the relationship between social media (in particular, TikTok) and perceptions of coercive control. Participants viewed seven TikTok videos which involved coercive control and judged them using quantitative questions and open-ended question. The results showed that a moderate negative correlation was observed, indicating that individuals who approved of the behaviour shown in the video held more permissive attitudes toward CC and did not perceive the behaviour as CC, while demographical variables were found to have a non-significant influence on CC perception. Regarding the qualitative aspect of the research, the results showed individuals did not normalise or idolise the behaviour depicted in the videos but instead categorised it as controlling and threatening. The most common theme in relation to what individuals regarded as coercive control was ‘restricting freedoms’ with two subthemes: ‘restricting travel’ and ‘restricting what an individual wears. Interestingly, individuals categorised videos depicting the use of physical violence as abuse and more serious than videos in which physical violence was absent. The present study expands upon previous research, offers directions for future research and highlights the value of education in raising awareness regarding coercive control.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in Human Behavior\",\"volume\":\"168 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108649\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in Human Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563225000962\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563225000962","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Are social media platforms blurring the lines between coercive control and healthy relationship? A study investigating perceptions of coercive control
This study was designed to investigate the relationship between social media (in particular, TikTok) and perceptions of coercive control. Participants viewed seven TikTok videos which involved coercive control and judged them using quantitative questions and open-ended question. The results showed that a moderate negative correlation was observed, indicating that individuals who approved of the behaviour shown in the video held more permissive attitudes toward CC and did not perceive the behaviour as CC, while demographical variables were found to have a non-significant influence on CC perception. Regarding the qualitative aspect of the research, the results showed individuals did not normalise or idolise the behaviour depicted in the videos but instead categorised it as controlling and threatening. The most common theme in relation to what individuals regarded as coercive control was ‘restricting freedoms’ with two subthemes: ‘restricting travel’ and ‘restricting what an individual wears. Interestingly, individuals categorised videos depicting the use of physical violence as abuse and more serious than videos in which physical violence was absent. The present study expands upon previous research, offers directions for future research and highlights the value of education in raising awareness regarding coercive control.
期刊介绍:
Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.