社交媒体平台是否模糊了强制控制与健康关系之间的界限?一项调查强制性控制感知的研究

IF 9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Holly Scothorne , Calli Tzani , Maria Ioannou , David Lester , Lucas Rogers , Thomas James Vaughan Williams , John Synnott , Greta Darmanin Kissaun
{"title":"社交媒体平台是否模糊了强制控制与健康关系之间的界限?一项调查强制性控制感知的研究","authors":"Holly Scothorne ,&nbsp;Calli Tzani ,&nbsp;Maria Ioannou ,&nbsp;David Lester ,&nbsp;Lucas Rogers ,&nbsp;Thomas James Vaughan Williams ,&nbsp;John Synnott ,&nbsp;Greta Darmanin Kissaun","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study was designed to investigate the relationship between social media (in particular, TikTok) and perceptions of coercive control. Participants viewed seven TikTok videos which involved coercive control and judged them using quantitative questions and open-ended question. The results showed that a moderate negative correlation was observed, indicating that individuals who approved of the behaviour shown in the video held more permissive attitudes toward CC and did not perceive the behaviour as CC, while demographical variables were found to have a non-significant influence on CC perception. Regarding the qualitative aspect of the research, the results showed individuals did not normalise or idolise the behaviour depicted in the videos but instead categorised it as controlling and threatening. The most common theme in relation to what individuals regarded as coercive control was ‘restricting freedoms’ with two subthemes: ‘restricting travel’ and ‘restricting what an individual wears. Interestingly, individuals categorised videos depicting the use of physical violence as abuse and more serious than videos in which physical violence was absent. The present study expands upon previous research, offers directions for future research and highlights the value of education in raising awareness regarding coercive control.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 108649"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are social media platforms blurring the lines between coercive control and healthy relationship? A study investigating perceptions of coercive control\",\"authors\":\"Holly Scothorne ,&nbsp;Calli Tzani ,&nbsp;Maria Ioannou ,&nbsp;David Lester ,&nbsp;Lucas Rogers ,&nbsp;Thomas James Vaughan Williams ,&nbsp;John Synnott ,&nbsp;Greta Darmanin Kissaun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108649\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study was designed to investigate the relationship between social media (in particular, TikTok) and perceptions of coercive control. Participants viewed seven TikTok videos which involved coercive control and judged them using quantitative questions and open-ended question. The results showed that a moderate negative correlation was observed, indicating that individuals who approved of the behaviour shown in the video held more permissive attitudes toward CC and did not perceive the behaviour as CC, while demographical variables were found to have a non-significant influence on CC perception. Regarding the qualitative aspect of the research, the results showed individuals did not normalise or idolise the behaviour depicted in the videos but instead categorised it as controlling and threatening. The most common theme in relation to what individuals regarded as coercive control was ‘restricting freedoms’ with two subthemes: ‘restricting travel’ and ‘restricting what an individual wears. Interestingly, individuals categorised videos depicting the use of physical violence as abuse and more serious than videos in which physical violence was absent. The present study expands upon previous research, offers directions for future research and highlights the value of education in raising awareness regarding coercive control.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in Human Behavior\",\"volume\":\"168 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108649\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in Human Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563225000962\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563225000962","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在调查社交媒体(特别是TikTok)与强制控制观念之间的关系。参与者观看了七个涉及强制控制的TikTok视频,并通过定量问题和开放式问题对其进行评判。结果显示,观察到适度的负相关,表明赞同视频中所示行为的个体对CC持更宽容的态度,并且不认为该行为是CC,而人口变量对CC感知的影响不显著。关于研究的定性方面,结果显示,人们并没有将视频中描述的行为正常化或偶像化,而是将其归类为控制和威胁。关于个人认为的强制性控制,最常见的主题是“限制自由”,还有两个次要主题:“限制旅行”和“限制个人着装”。有趣的是,人们将描述使用身体暴力的视频归类为虐待,比没有身体暴力的视频更严重。本研究对以往的研究进行了拓展,为未来的研究提供了方向,并强调了教育在提高对强制控制的认识方面的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are social media platforms blurring the lines between coercive control and healthy relationship? A study investigating perceptions of coercive control
This study was designed to investigate the relationship between social media (in particular, TikTok) and perceptions of coercive control. Participants viewed seven TikTok videos which involved coercive control and judged them using quantitative questions and open-ended question. The results showed that a moderate negative correlation was observed, indicating that individuals who approved of the behaviour shown in the video held more permissive attitudes toward CC and did not perceive the behaviour as CC, while demographical variables were found to have a non-significant influence on CC perception. Regarding the qualitative aspect of the research, the results showed individuals did not normalise or idolise the behaviour depicted in the videos but instead categorised it as controlling and threatening. The most common theme in relation to what individuals regarded as coercive control was ‘restricting freedoms’ with two subthemes: ‘restricting travel’ and ‘restricting what an individual wears. Interestingly, individuals categorised videos depicting the use of physical violence as abuse and more serious than videos in which physical violence was absent. The present study expands upon previous research, offers directions for future research and highlights the value of education in raising awareness regarding coercive control.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
381
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信