{"title":"再发表:评估骨传导oVEMPs使用额内侧和乳突刺激","authors":"S. Ghavami , M. Kayal , R. Maire","doi":"10.1016/j.aforl.2025.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>To determine the optimal stimulation intensity for frontal stimulation with a modified slit lamp holder and to compare the reliability and symmetry of bone-conducted ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMPs) using two stimulation sites: frontal medial and mastoid.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This observational study included 33 healthy volunteers (15 women, 18 men; mean age 24.5<!--> <!-->years) at the University Hospital of Lausanne. Participants underwent otoneurological assessments, and those with normal results were included. Bone-conducted oVEMPs were recorded using a Brüel and Kjaer mini-shaker type 4810. A modified slit lamp holder was used for frontal stimulation to ensure consistent application pressure, freeing the examiner's hands. Mastoid stimulation was performed manually.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The best reproducibility of oVEMP recordings was observed at 70<!--> <!-->dB nHL. Frontal stimulation demonstrated lower dispersion of data and lower asymmetry ratios of latencies (up to 7%) and amplitudes (up to 50%) compared to mastoid stimulation (up to 40% for latencies). Single stimulations at both frontal and mastoid sites were sufficient to obtain reliable measurements of both utricles.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Frontal stimulation at 70<!--> <!-->dB nHL using a modified slit lamp holder is recommended for bone-conducted oVEMP recordings due to its superior reproducibility, comfort, and reliability. This study establishes a new standard for optimal stimulation intensity and supports the use of frontal stimulation in clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38853,"journal":{"name":"Annales Francaises d''Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie et de Pathologie Cervico-Faciale","volume":"142 2","pages":"Pages 63-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Republication de : Evaluation of bone-conducted oVEMPs using frontal medial and mastoid stimulations\",\"authors\":\"S. Ghavami , M. Kayal , R. Maire\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aforl.2025.03.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>To determine the optimal stimulation intensity for frontal stimulation with a modified slit lamp holder and to compare the reliability and symmetry of bone-conducted ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMPs) using two stimulation sites: frontal medial and mastoid.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This observational study included 33 healthy volunteers (15 women, 18 men; mean age 24.5<!--> <!-->years) at the University Hospital of Lausanne. Participants underwent otoneurological assessments, and those with normal results were included. Bone-conducted oVEMPs were recorded using a Brüel and Kjaer mini-shaker type 4810. A modified slit lamp holder was used for frontal stimulation to ensure consistent application pressure, freeing the examiner's hands. Mastoid stimulation was performed manually.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The best reproducibility of oVEMP recordings was observed at 70<!--> <!-->dB nHL. Frontal stimulation demonstrated lower dispersion of data and lower asymmetry ratios of latencies (up to 7%) and amplitudes (up to 50%) compared to mastoid stimulation (up to 40% for latencies). Single stimulations at both frontal and mastoid sites were sufficient to obtain reliable measurements of both utricles.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Frontal stimulation at 70<!--> <!-->dB nHL using a modified slit lamp holder is recommended for bone-conducted oVEMP recordings due to its superior reproducibility, comfort, and reliability. This study establishes a new standard for optimal stimulation intensity and supports the use of frontal stimulation in clinical practice.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annales Francaises d''Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie et de Pathologie Cervico-Faciale\",\"volume\":\"142 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 63-68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annales Francaises d''Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie et de Pathologie Cervico-Faciale\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879726125000282\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales Francaises d''Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie et de Pathologie Cervico-Faciale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879726125000282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的确定改良裂隙灯座额骨刺激的最佳刺激强度,比较额骨内侧和乳突两个刺激部位骨传导眼前庭诱发肌源性电位(oVEMPs)的可靠性和对称性。方法本观察性研究纳入33名健康志愿者(15名女性,18名男性;平均年龄24.5岁)在洛桑大学医院。参与者接受了耳神经学评估,结果正常的参与者也被纳入其中。骨传导ovemp使用br el和Kjaer 4810型微型振动器进行记录。一个改进的裂隙灯座用于正面刺激,以确保一致的应用压力,解放考官的手。手动进行乳突刺激。结果在70db nHL下,oVEMP记录的重现性最好。与乳突刺激(潜伏期高达40%)相比,额叶刺激显示出更低的数据离散度和更低的潜伏期不对称比率(高达7%)和振幅(高达50%)。额部和乳突部的单次刺激足以获得两个核室的可靠测量。结论:采用改良的裂隙灯座在70 dB nHL下进行额部刺激,具有良好的再现性、舒适性和可靠性,可用于骨传导oVEMP记录。本研究建立了最佳刺激强度的新标准,并支持在临床实践中使用额叶刺激。
Republication de : Evaluation of bone-conducted oVEMPs using frontal medial and mastoid stimulations
Aims
To determine the optimal stimulation intensity for frontal stimulation with a modified slit lamp holder and to compare the reliability and symmetry of bone-conducted ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMPs) using two stimulation sites: frontal medial and mastoid.
Methods
This observational study included 33 healthy volunteers (15 women, 18 men; mean age 24.5 years) at the University Hospital of Lausanne. Participants underwent otoneurological assessments, and those with normal results were included. Bone-conducted oVEMPs were recorded using a Brüel and Kjaer mini-shaker type 4810. A modified slit lamp holder was used for frontal stimulation to ensure consistent application pressure, freeing the examiner's hands. Mastoid stimulation was performed manually.
Results
The best reproducibility of oVEMP recordings was observed at 70 dB nHL. Frontal stimulation demonstrated lower dispersion of data and lower asymmetry ratios of latencies (up to 7%) and amplitudes (up to 50%) compared to mastoid stimulation (up to 40% for latencies). Single stimulations at both frontal and mastoid sites were sufficient to obtain reliable measurements of both utricles.
Conclusion
Frontal stimulation at 70 dB nHL using a modified slit lamp holder is recommended for bone-conducted oVEMP recordings due to its superior reproducibility, comfort, and reliability. This study establishes a new standard for optimal stimulation intensity and supports the use of frontal stimulation in clinical practice.