Cory L. Struthers , Min-kyeong Cha , Marilyn A. Brown
{"title":"知识就是力量?信息,党派分歧,以及对能源基础设施的支持","authors":"Cory L. Struthers , Min-kyeong Cha , Marilyn A. Brown","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.103976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Partisanship and ideology, environmental attitudes, government trust, and related beliefs and values can influence public opinion on clean energy and climate change. Few studies have examined how factual information about the energy sector relates to public support for different types of energy infrastructure. Using an original survey of 1,342 residents of the U.S. state of Georgia, regression analysis, and a survey experiment, we test whether energy knowledge is associated with support for renewable and fossil fuel energy infrastructure, and if political identities moderate this relationship. We find that respondents with more factual information about energy are more likely to support solar panels, wind farms, transmission lines, and energy efficient technologies—key building blocks of the clean energy transition. Conversely, we observe a partisan wedge in energy knowledge for two fossil fuels: Greater energy knowledge corresponds with opposition to coal plants only among Democrats and support for natural gas only among Republicans. The information treatment in the survey experiment has no effect, suggesting that factual information alone may not change opinion. Altogether, our research shows that knowledge corresponds with greater support for renewable and efficient energy technologies but that politics and values may compete with facts in shaping views, particularly on fossil fuel infrastructure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 103976"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge is power? Information, partisan cleavages, and support for energy infrastructure\",\"authors\":\"Cory L. Struthers , Min-kyeong Cha , Marilyn A. Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2025.103976\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Partisanship and ideology, environmental attitudes, government trust, and related beliefs and values can influence public opinion on clean energy and climate change. Few studies have examined how factual information about the energy sector relates to public support for different types of energy infrastructure. Using an original survey of 1,342 residents of the U.S. state of Georgia, regression analysis, and a survey experiment, we test whether energy knowledge is associated with support for renewable and fossil fuel energy infrastructure, and if political identities moderate this relationship. We find that respondents with more factual information about energy are more likely to support solar panels, wind farms, transmission lines, and energy efficient technologies—key building blocks of the clean energy transition. Conversely, we observe a partisan wedge in energy knowledge for two fossil fuels: Greater energy knowledge corresponds with opposition to coal plants only among Democrats and support for natural gas only among Republicans. The information treatment in the survey experiment has no effect, suggesting that factual information alone may not change opinion. Altogether, our research shows that knowledge corresponds with greater support for renewable and efficient energy technologies but that politics and values may compete with facts in shaping views, particularly on fossil fuel infrastructure.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"123 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103976\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221462962500057X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221462962500057X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Knowledge is power? Information, partisan cleavages, and support for energy infrastructure
Partisanship and ideology, environmental attitudes, government trust, and related beliefs and values can influence public opinion on clean energy and climate change. Few studies have examined how factual information about the energy sector relates to public support for different types of energy infrastructure. Using an original survey of 1,342 residents of the U.S. state of Georgia, regression analysis, and a survey experiment, we test whether energy knowledge is associated with support for renewable and fossil fuel energy infrastructure, and if political identities moderate this relationship. We find that respondents with more factual information about energy are more likely to support solar panels, wind farms, transmission lines, and energy efficient technologies—key building blocks of the clean energy transition. Conversely, we observe a partisan wedge in energy knowledge for two fossil fuels: Greater energy knowledge corresponds with opposition to coal plants only among Democrats and support for natural gas only among Republicans. The information treatment in the survey experiment has no effect, suggesting that factual information alone may not change opinion. Altogether, our research shows that knowledge corresponds with greater support for renewable and efficient energy technologies but that politics and values may compete with facts in shaping views, particularly on fossil fuel infrastructure.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.