铺平道路:一种基于熵的联合妥协解决方案方法,以促进印度塑料工业向循环经济过渡

IF 12.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Sudipta Ghosh, Rakesh D. Raut, Naoufel Cheikhrouhou, Chiranjib Bhowmik, Amitava Ray
{"title":"铺平道路:一种基于熵的联合妥协解决方案方法,以促进印度塑料工业向循环经济过渡","authors":"Sudipta Ghosh, Rakesh D. Raut, Naoufel Cheikhrouhou, Chiranjib Bhowmik, Amitava Ray","doi":"10.1002/bse.4253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The traditional “take‐make‐use‐dispose”‐type economic pattern has led to severe environmental challenges, particularly in the plastic industry, where waste generation and resource inefficiency are of utmost concerns. Transitioning to a circular economy (<jats:sc>CE</jats:sc>) requires strategic supplier evaluation to ensure sustainable sourcing. However, <jats:sc>CE</jats:sc> implementation in emerging economies remains underexplored, and no established framework exists for circular supplier selection (CSS) in the plastic industry. This study addresses a practical CSS problem faced by a leading Indian plastic manufacturer (the case organization) aiming to partner with an ideal supplier for developing innovative circular products. Through a Delphi study, eight key evaluation criteria were identified and validated. A multi‐criteria decision‐making (MCDM) framework integrating the entropy method (for criteria weighting) and the combined compromise solution (COCOSO) method (for supplier ranking) was applied. The findings reveal that “total consumption of toxic substances” and “reduction in workplace hazards through employee wellbeing activities” are the two most influential CSS criteria. Based on the ranking, the most suitable supplier was recommended to the case organization. This research reinforces supplier selection models by integrating social, environmental, and economic dimensions within a <jats:sc>CE</jats:sc> context. The novel entropy‐COCOSO framework further improves decision‐making by reducing subjectivity and improving ranking accuracy. Practically, the study provides managers and policymakers with a robust decision‐support tool to facilitate <jats:sc>CE</jats:sc> adoption in the plastic industry, guiding sustainable procurement strategies.","PeriodicalId":9518,"journal":{"name":"Business Strategy and The Environment","volume":"183 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paving the Pathway: An Entropy‐Based Combined Compromise Solution Approach to Facilitate the Indian Plastic Industry's Transition Toward a Circular Economy\",\"authors\":\"Sudipta Ghosh, Rakesh D. Raut, Naoufel Cheikhrouhou, Chiranjib Bhowmik, Amitava Ray\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bse.4253\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The traditional “take‐make‐use‐dispose”‐type economic pattern has led to severe environmental challenges, particularly in the plastic industry, where waste generation and resource inefficiency are of utmost concerns. Transitioning to a circular economy (<jats:sc>CE</jats:sc>) requires strategic supplier evaluation to ensure sustainable sourcing. However, <jats:sc>CE</jats:sc> implementation in emerging economies remains underexplored, and no established framework exists for circular supplier selection (CSS) in the plastic industry. This study addresses a practical CSS problem faced by a leading Indian plastic manufacturer (the case organization) aiming to partner with an ideal supplier for developing innovative circular products. Through a Delphi study, eight key evaluation criteria were identified and validated. A multi‐criteria decision‐making (MCDM) framework integrating the entropy method (for criteria weighting) and the combined compromise solution (COCOSO) method (for supplier ranking) was applied. The findings reveal that “total consumption of toxic substances” and “reduction in workplace hazards through employee wellbeing activities” are the two most influential CSS criteria. Based on the ranking, the most suitable supplier was recommended to the case organization. This research reinforces supplier selection models by integrating social, environmental, and economic dimensions within a <jats:sc>CE</jats:sc> context. The novel entropy‐COCOSO framework further improves decision‐making by reducing subjectivity and improving ranking accuracy. Practically, the study provides managers and policymakers with a robust decision‐support tool to facilitate <jats:sc>CE</jats:sc> adoption in the plastic industry, guiding sustainable procurement strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Business Strategy and The Environment\",\"volume\":\"183 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Business Strategy and The Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4253\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Strategy and The Environment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4253","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统的“获取-制造-利用-处理”型经济模式导致了严峻的环境挑战,特别是在塑料行业,废物产生和资源效率低下是最令人担忧的问题。向循环经济(CE)转型需要对供应商进行战略性评估,以确保可持续采购。然而,新兴经济体的CE实施仍未得到充分探索,塑料行业的循环供应商选择(CSS)也没有既定的框架。本研究解决了印度一家领先的塑料制造商(案例组织)所面临的实际CSS问题,该公司旨在与一家理想的供应商合作开发创新的循环产品。通过德尔菲研究,确定并验证了8个关键评价标准。采用了一种多准则决策(MCDM)框架,该框架将熵法(用于标准加权)和组合妥协解(COCOSO)方法(用于供应商排序)相结合。研究结果显示,“有毒物质的总消费量”和“通过员工福利活动减少工作场所危害”是两个最具影响力的CSS标准。根据排名,向案例组织推荐最合适的供应商。本研究通过在CE背景下整合社会、环境和经济维度来强化供应商选择模型。新的熵- COCOSO框架通过减少主观性和提高排序准确性进一步改善了决策。实际上,该研究为管理者和决策者提供了一个强大的决策支持工具,以促进塑料行业采用CE,指导可持续采购战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Paving the Pathway: An Entropy‐Based Combined Compromise Solution Approach to Facilitate the Indian Plastic Industry's Transition Toward a Circular Economy
The traditional “take‐make‐use‐dispose”‐type economic pattern has led to severe environmental challenges, particularly in the plastic industry, where waste generation and resource inefficiency are of utmost concerns. Transitioning to a circular economy (CE) requires strategic supplier evaluation to ensure sustainable sourcing. However, CE implementation in emerging economies remains underexplored, and no established framework exists for circular supplier selection (CSS) in the plastic industry. This study addresses a practical CSS problem faced by a leading Indian plastic manufacturer (the case organization) aiming to partner with an ideal supplier for developing innovative circular products. Through a Delphi study, eight key evaluation criteria were identified and validated. A multi‐criteria decision‐making (MCDM) framework integrating the entropy method (for criteria weighting) and the combined compromise solution (COCOSO) method (for supplier ranking) was applied. The findings reveal that “total consumption of toxic substances” and “reduction in workplace hazards through employee wellbeing activities” are the two most influential CSS criteria. Based on the ranking, the most suitable supplier was recommended to the case organization. This research reinforces supplier selection models by integrating social, environmental, and economic dimensions within a CE context. The novel entropy‐COCOSO framework further improves decision‐making by reducing subjectivity and improving ranking accuracy. Practically, the study provides managers and policymakers with a robust decision‐support tool to facilitate CE adoption in the plastic industry, guiding sustainable procurement strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.50
自引率
19.40%
发文量
336
期刊介绍: Business Strategy and the Environment (BSE) is a leading academic journal focused on business strategies for improving the natural environment. It publishes peer-reviewed research on various topics such as systems and standards, environmental performance, disclosure, eco-innovation, corporate environmental management tools, organizations and management, supply chains, circular economy, governance, green finance, industry sectors, and responses to climate change and other contemporary environmental issues. The journal aims to provide original contributions that enhance the understanding of sustainability in business. Its target audience includes academics, practitioners, business managers, and consultants. However, BSE does not accept papers on corporate social responsibility (CSR), as this topic is covered by its sibling journal Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. The journal is indexed in several databases and collections such as ABI/INFORM Collection, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, BIOBASE, Emerald Management Reviews, GeoArchive, Environment Index, GEOBASE, INSPEC, Technology Collection, and Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信