Sudipta Ghosh, Rakesh D. Raut, Naoufel Cheikhrouhou, Chiranjib Bhowmik, Amitava Ray
{"title":"铺平道路:一种基于熵的联合妥协解决方案方法,以促进印度塑料工业向循环经济过渡","authors":"Sudipta Ghosh, Rakesh D. Raut, Naoufel Cheikhrouhou, Chiranjib Bhowmik, Amitava Ray","doi":"10.1002/bse.4253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The traditional “take‐make‐use‐dispose”‐type economic pattern has led to severe environmental challenges, particularly in the plastic industry, where waste generation and resource inefficiency are of utmost concerns. Transitioning to a circular economy (<jats:sc>CE</jats:sc>) requires strategic supplier evaluation to ensure sustainable sourcing. However, <jats:sc>CE</jats:sc> implementation in emerging economies remains underexplored, and no established framework exists for circular supplier selection (CSS) in the plastic industry. This study addresses a practical CSS problem faced by a leading Indian plastic manufacturer (the case organization) aiming to partner with an ideal supplier for developing innovative circular products. Through a Delphi study, eight key evaluation criteria were identified and validated. A multi‐criteria decision‐making (MCDM) framework integrating the entropy method (for criteria weighting) and the combined compromise solution (COCOSO) method (for supplier ranking) was applied. The findings reveal that “total consumption of toxic substances” and “reduction in workplace hazards through employee wellbeing activities” are the two most influential CSS criteria. Based on the ranking, the most suitable supplier was recommended to the case organization. This research reinforces supplier selection models by integrating social, environmental, and economic dimensions within a <jats:sc>CE</jats:sc> context. The novel entropy‐COCOSO framework further improves decision‐making by reducing subjectivity and improving ranking accuracy. Practically, the study provides managers and policymakers with a robust decision‐support tool to facilitate <jats:sc>CE</jats:sc> adoption in the plastic industry, guiding sustainable procurement strategies.","PeriodicalId":9518,"journal":{"name":"Business Strategy and The Environment","volume":"183 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paving the Pathway: An Entropy‐Based Combined Compromise Solution Approach to Facilitate the Indian Plastic Industry's Transition Toward a Circular Economy\",\"authors\":\"Sudipta Ghosh, Rakesh D. Raut, Naoufel Cheikhrouhou, Chiranjib Bhowmik, Amitava Ray\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bse.4253\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The traditional “take‐make‐use‐dispose”‐type economic pattern has led to severe environmental challenges, particularly in the plastic industry, where waste generation and resource inefficiency are of utmost concerns. Transitioning to a circular economy (<jats:sc>CE</jats:sc>) requires strategic supplier evaluation to ensure sustainable sourcing. However, <jats:sc>CE</jats:sc> implementation in emerging economies remains underexplored, and no established framework exists for circular supplier selection (CSS) in the plastic industry. This study addresses a practical CSS problem faced by a leading Indian plastic manufacturer (the case organization) aiming to partner with an ideal supplier for developing innovative circular products. Through a Delphi study, eight key evaluation criteria were identified and validated. A multi‐criteria decision‐making (MCDM) framework integrating the entropy method (for criteria weighting) and the combined compromise solution (COCOSO) method (for supplier ranking) was applied. The findings reveal that “total consumption of toxic substances” and “reduction in workplace hazards through employee wellbeing activities” are the two most influential CSS criteria. Based on the ranking, the most suitable supplier was recommended to the case organization. This research reinforces supplier selection models by integrating social, environmental, and economic dimensions within a <jats:sc>CE</jats:sc> context. The novel entropy‐COCOSO framework further improves decision‐making by reducing subjectivity and improving ranking accuracy. Practically, the study provides managers and policymakers with a robust decision‐support tool to facilitate <jats:sc>CE</jats:sc> adoption in the plastic industry, guiding sustainable procurement strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Business Strategy and The Environment\",\"volume\":\"183 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Business Strategy and The Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4253\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Strategy and The Environment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4253","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Paving the Pathway: An Entropy‐Based Combined Compromise Solution Approach to Facilitate the Indian Plastic Industry's Transition Toward a Circular Economy
The traditional “take‐make‐use‐dispose”‐type economic pattern has led to severe environmental challenges, particularly in the plastic industry, where waste generation and resource inefficiency are of utmost concerns. Transitioning to a circular economy (CE) requires strategic supplier evaluation to ensure sustainable sourcing. However, CE implementation in emerging economies remains underexplored, and no established framework exists for circular supplier selection (CSS) in the plastic industry. This study addresses a practical CSS problem faced by a leading Indian plastic manufacturer (the case organization) aiming to partner with an ideal supplier for developing innovative circular products. Through a Delphi study, eight key evaluation criteria were identified and validated. A multi‐criteria decision‐making (MCDM) framework integrating the entropy method (for criteria weighting) and the combined compromise solution (COCOSO) method (for supplier ranking) was applied. The findings reveal that “total consumption of toxic substances” and “reduction in workplace hazards through employee wellbeing activities” are the two most influential CSS criteria. Based on the ranking, the most suitable supplier was recommended to the case organization. This research reinforces supplier selection models by integrating social, environmental, and economic dimensions within a CE context. The novel entropy‐COCOSO framework further improves decision‐making by reducing subjectivity and improving ranking accuracy. Practically, the study provides managers and policymakers with a robust decision‐support tool to facilitate CE adoption in the plastic industry, guiding sustainable procurement strategies.
期刊介绍:
Business Strategy and the Environment (BSE) is a leading academic journal focused on business strategies for improving the natural environment. It publishes peer-reviewed research on various topics such as systems and standards, environmental performance, disclosure, eco-innovation, corporate environmental management tools, organizations and management, supply chains, circular economy, governance, green finance, industry sectors, and responses to climate change and other contemporary environmental issues. The journal aims to provide original contributions that enhance the understanding of sustainability in business. Its target audience includes academics, practitioners, business managers, and consultants. However, BSE does not accept papers on corporate social responsibility (CSR), as this topic is covered by its sibling journal Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. The journal is indexed in several databases and collections such as ABI/INFORM Collection, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, BIOBASE, Emerald Management Reviews, GeoArchive, Environment Index, GEOBASE, INSPEC, Technology Collection, and Web of Science.