Nauzley C Abedini, Erin K Kross, Ruth A Engelberg, Gigi Garzio, Claire J Creutzfeldt
{"title":"针对门诊脑卒中幸存者实施护理目标沟通引导干预:试点研究。","authors":"Nauzley C Abedini, Erin K Kross, Ruth A Engelberg, Gigi Garzio, Claire J Creutzfeldt","doi":"10.1177/10499091251328949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Serious illness communication priming guides like the Jumpstart Guide can increase goals-of-care conversations (GOCC), but have not been evaluated in the stroke population. <b>Objectives:</b> To conduct a randomized pilot study evaluating feasibility and acceptability of the Jumpstart Guide adapted for outpatient stroke survivors, their surrogates, and clinicians. <b>Methods:</b> We recruited stroke survivors ≥60 years of age (or their surrogates if patients had communication barriers) at a single academically-affiliated stroke clinic. Patients/surrogates were randomized to intervention (patient/surrogate and clinician received pre-visit Jumpstart Guide) or control arms. We assessed feasibility of participant enrollment, survey completion and extraction of GOCC documentation. We assessed acceptability using patient/surrogate and clinician surveys. <b>Results:</b> We enrolled 15/24 (63%) of eligible patients or surrogates, 8 of which were randomized to the intervention vs 7 to the control arm. Six clinicians were enrolled for the 8 intervention encounters. Patient characteristics in both groups were similar with mean age 74.7 years, 10/15 male, 12/15 white, and 10/15 with acute ischemic stroke. Most patients/surrogates (7/8 intervention vs 7/7 control) and all intervention clinicians completed post-visit surveys. Most intervention participants reported successful pre-visit receipt of the Jumpstart Guide (6/7 patient/surrogates; 6/8 clinicians). Of these, all intervention patients/surrogates and 5/6 clinicians stated they would \"definitely\" or \"probably\" recommend it to others. Two intervention vs no control patients had newly documented GOCC post-visit. <b>Conclusions:</b> Implementation of a stroke-specific Jumpstart guide in an outpatient stroke clinic is feasible and acceptable. A large randomized controlled trial is needed to evaluate its efficacy in improving GOCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":" ","pages":"10499091251328949"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of a Goals-of-Care Communication Priming Intervention Tailored to Outpatient Stroke Survivors: A Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Nauzley C Abedini, Erin K Kross, Ruth A Engelberg, Gigi Garzio, Claire J Creutzfeldt\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10499091251328949\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Serious illness communication priming guides like the Jumpstart Guide can increase goals-of-care conversations (GOCC), but have not been evaluated in the stroke population. <b>Objectives:</b> To conduct a randomized pilot study evaluating feasibility and acceptability of the Jumpstart Guide adapted for outpatient stroke survivors, their surrogates, and clinicians. <b>Methods:</b> We recruited stroke survivors ≥60 years of age (or their surrogates if patients had communication barriers) at a single academically-affiliated stroke clinic. Patients/surrogates were randomized to intervention (patient/surrogate and clinician received pre-visit Jumpstart Guide) or control arms. We assessed feasibility of participant enrollment, survey completion and extraction of GOCC documentation. We assessed acceptability using patient/surrogate and clinician surveys. <b>Results:</b> We enrolled 15/24 (63%) of eligible patients or surrogates, 8 of which were randomized to the intervention vs 7 to the control arm. Six clinicians were enrolled for the 8 intervention encounters. Patient characteristics in both groups were similar with mean age 74.7 years, 10/15 male, 12/15 white, and 10/15 with acute ischemic stroke. Most patients/surrogates (7/8 intervention vs 7/7 control) and all intervention clinicians completed post-visit surveys. Most intervention participants reported successful pre-visit receipt of the Jumpstart Guide (6/7 patient/surrogates; 6/8 clinicians). Of these, all intervention patients/surrogates and 5/6 clinicians stated they would \\\"definitely\\\" or \\\"probably\\\" recommend it to others. Two intervention vs no control patients had newly documented GOCC post-visit. <b>Conclusions:</b> Implementation of a stroke-specific Jumpstart guide in an outpatient stroke clinic is feasible and acceptable. A large randomized controlled trial is needed to evaluate its efficacy in improving GOCC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American journal of hospice & palliative care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10499091251328949\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American journal of hospice & palliative care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091251328949\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091251328949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Implementation of a Goals-of-Care Communication Priming Intervention Tailored to Outpatient Stroke Survivors: A Pilot Study.
Background: Serious illness communication priming guides like the Jumpstart Guide can increase goals-of-care conversations (GOCC), but have not been evaluated in the stroke population. Objectives: To conduct a randomized pilot study evaluating feasibility and acceptability of the Jumpstart Guide adapted for outpatient stroke survivors, their surrogates, and clinicians. Methods: We recruited stroke survivors ≥60 years of age (or their surrogates if patients had communication barriers) at a single academically-affiliated stroke clinic. Patients/surrogates were randomized to intervention (patient/surrogate and clinician received pre-visit Jumpstart Guide) or control arms. We assessed feasibility of participant enrollment, survey completion and extraction of GOCC documentation. We assessed acceptability using patient/surrogate and clinician surveys. Results: We enrolled 15/24 (63%) of eligible patients or surrogates, 8 of which were randomized to the intervention vs 7 to the control arm. Six clinicians were enrolled for the 8 intervention encounters. Patient characteristics in both groups were similar with mean age 74.7 years, 10/15 male, 12/15 white, and 10/15 with acute ischemic stroke. Most patients/surrogates (7/8 intervention vs 7/7 control) and all intervention clinicians completed post-visit surveys. Most intervention participants reported successful pre-visit receipt of the Jumpstart Guide (6/7 patient/surrogates; 6/8 clinicians). Of these, all intervention patients/surrogates and 5/6 clinicians stated they would "definitely" or "probably" recommend it to others. Two intervention vs no control patients had newly documented GOCC post-visit. Conclusions: Implementation of a stroke-specific Jumpstart guide in an outpatient stroke clinic is feasible and acceptable. A large randomized controlled trial is needed to evaluate its efficacy in improving GOCC.