青光眼的虚拟现实视野测试:利弊。

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2025-03-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S511803
Adrian T Babel, Mohamed M Soumakieh, Allison Y Chen, Caroline Wong, Douglas R da Costa, David R P Almeida
{"title":"青光眼的虚拟现实视野测试:利弊。","authors":"Adrian T Babel, Mohamed M Soumakieh, Allison Y Chen, Caroline Wong, Douglas R da Costa, David R P Almeida","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S511803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Virtual reality-assisted visual field testing (VRVFT) is a novel modality for evaluating glaucoma progression, offering potential advantages over standard automated perimetry (SAP). To date, no narrative literature review has comprehensively discussed the benefits and drawbacks of VRVFT for glaucoma patients.</p><p><strong>Observations: </strong>A narrative literature review was conducted using PubMed and MEDLINE via EBSCOhost, covering articles published from 2014 to October 2023. The search terms used were \"virtual reality visual field\" AND \"glaucoma\". Filters applied included \"Free full text\", \"Full text\", and \"Peer Reviewed.\" Inclusion criteria encompassed studies evaluating VRVFT in relation to glaucoma. Exclusion criteria included duplicates, meta-analyses, literature not discussing glaucoma or VRVFT, and other literature reviews. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising various study designs. VRVFT showed comparable reliability and efficacy to SAP in detecting glaucomatous visual field defects. Benefits of VRVFT included improved accessibility, patient comfort, and resource optimization. Drawbacks included technical limitations such as restricted luminance range, lack of sophisticated eye-tracking in some devices, and implementation challenges like patient technology familiarity and access to equipment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VRVFT presents several benefits, making it a promising alternative or complement to conventional glaucomatous visual field testing in outpatient clinics and remote settings. Addressing technical limitations and standardizing protocols are essential for broader clinical adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"19 ","pages":"933-937"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926061/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Virtual Reality Visual Field Testing in Glaucoma: Benefits and Drawbacks.\",\"authors\":\"Adrian T Babel, Mohamed M Soumakieh, Allison Y Chen, Caroline Wong, Douglas R da Costa, David R P Almeida\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OPTH.S511803\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Virtual reality-assisted visual field testing (VRVFT) is a novel modality for evaluating glaucoma progression, offering potential advantages over standard automated perimetry (SAP). To date, no narrative literature review has comprehensively discussed the benefits and drawbacks of VRVFT for glaucoma patients.</p><p><strong>Observations: </strong>A narrative literature review was conducted using PubMed and MEDLINE via EBSCOhost, covering articles published from 2014 to October 2023. The search terms used were \\\"virtual reality visual field\\\" AND \\\"glaucoma\\\". Filters applied included \\\"Free full text\\\", \\\"Full text\\\", and \\\"Peer Reviewed.\\\" Inclusion criteria encompassed studies evaluating VRVFT in relation to glaucoma. Exclusion criteria included duplicates, meta-analyses, literature not discussing glaucoma or VRVFT, and other literature reviews. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising various study designs. VRVFT showed comparable reliability and efficacy to SAP in detecting glaucomatous visual field defects. Benefits of VRVFT included improved accessibility, patient comfort, and resource optimization. Drawbacks included technical limitations such as restricted luminance range, lack of sophisticated eye-tracking in some devices, and implementation challenges like patient technology familiarity and access to equipment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VRVFT presents several benefits, making it a promising alternative or complement to conventional glaucomatous visual field testing in outpatient clinics and remote settings. Addressing technical limitations and standardizing protocols are essential for broader clinical adoption.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"933-937\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926061/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S511803\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S511803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:虚拟现实辅助视野测试(VRVFT)是一种评估青光眼进展的新方法,与标准的自动视距检查(SAP)相比具有潜在的优势。迄今为止,尚未有叙述性文献综述全面讨论VRVFT治疗青光眼患者的利弊。观察:通过EBSCOhost使用PubMed和MEDLINE进行叙述性文献综述,涵盖2014年至2023年10月发表的文章。搜索词是“虚拟现实视野”和“青光眼”。应用的过滤器包括“免费全文”、“全文”和“同行评审”。纳入标准包括评价VRVFT与青光眼关系的研究。排除标准包括重复、荟萃分析、未讨论青光眼或VRVFT的文献和其他文献综述。16项研究符合纳入标准,包括不同的研究设计。VRVFT检测青光眼视野缺损的可靠性和有效性与SAP相当。VRVFT的好处包括改善可及性、患者舒适度和资源优化。缺点包括技术上的限制,如受限的亮度范围,一些设备缺乏复杂的眼球追踪,以及实施上的挑战,如患者对技术的熟悉程度和设备的使用。结论:VRVFT有几个优点,使其成为门诊和偏远地区传统青光眼视野测试的有希望的替代或补充。解决技术限制和标准化方案对于更广泛的临床应用至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Virtual Reality Visual Field Testing in Glaucoma: Benefits and Drawbacks.

Importance: Virtual reality-assisted visual field testing (VRVFT) is a novel modality for evaluating glaucoma progression, offering potential advantages over standard automated perimetry (SAP). To date, no narrative literature review has comprehensively discussed the benefits and drawbacks of VRVFT for glaucoma patients.

Observations: A narrative literature review was conducted using PubMed and MEDLINE via EBSCOhost, covering articles published from 2014 to October 2023. The search terms used were "virtual reality visual field" AND "glaucoma". Filters applied included "Free full text", "Full text", and "Peer Reviewed." Inclusion criteria encompassed studies evaluating VRVFT in relation to glaucoma. Exclusion criteria included duplicates, meta-analyses, literature not discussing glaucoma or VRVFT, and other literature reviews. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising various study designs. VRVFT showed comparable reliability and efficacy to SAP in detecting glaucomatous visual field defects. Benefits of VRVFT included improved accessibility, patient comfort, and resource optimization. Drawbacks included technical limitations such as restricted luminance range, lack of sophisticated eye-tracking in some devices, and implementation challenges like patient technology familiarity and access to equipment.

Conclusion: VRVFT presents several benefits, making it a promising alternative or complement to conventional glaucomatous visual field testing in outpatient clinics and remote settings. Addressing technical limitations and standardizing protocols are essential for broader clinical adoption.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信