一种深度学习算法的发展和评估,以区分超声上附着在视盘上的膜。

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2025-03-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S501316
Vaidehi D Bhatt, Nikhil Shah, Deepak C Bhatt, Supriya Dabir, Jay Sheth, Tos T J M Berendschot, Roel J Erckens, Carroll A B Webers
{"title":"一种深度学习算法的发展和评估,以区分超声上附着在视盘上的膜。","authors":"Vaidehi D Bhatt, Nikhil Shah, Deepak C Bhatt, Supriya Dabir, Jay Sheth, Tos T J M Berendschot, Roel J Erckens, Carroll A B Webers","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S501316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to create and test a deep learning algorithm that could identify and distinguish between membranes attached to optic disc [OD; retinal detachment (RD)/posterior vitreous detachment (PVD)] based on ocular ultrasonography (USG).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We obtained a database of B-scan ultrasonography from a high-volume imaging center. A transformer-based Vision Transformer (ViT) model was employed, pre-trained on ImageNet21K, to classify ultrasound B-scan images into healthy, RD, and PVD. Images were pre-processed using Hugging Face's AutoImage Processor for standardization. Labels were mapped to numerical values, and the dataset was split into training and validation (505 samples), and testing (212 samples) subsets to evaluate model performance. Alternate methods, such as ensemble strategies and object detection pipelines, were explored but showed limited improvement in classification accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AI model demonstrated high classification performance, achieving an accuracy of 98.21% for PVD, 97.22% for RD, and 95.83% for normal cases. Sensitivity was 98.21% for PVD, 96.55% for RD, and 92.86% for normal cases, while specificity reached 95.16%, 100%, and 95.42%, respectively. Despite the overall strong performance, some misclassification occurred, with seven instances of RD being incorrectly labeled as PVD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We developed a transformer-based deep learning algorithm for ocular ultrasonography that accurately identifies membranes attached to the optic disc, distinguishing between RD (97.22% accuracy) and PVD (98.21% accuracy). Despite seven misclassifications, our model demonstrates robust performance and enhances diagnostic efficiency in high-volume imaging settings, thereby facilitating timely referrals and ultimately improving patient outcomes in urgent care scenarios. Overall, this promising innovation shows potential for clinical adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"19 ","pages":"939-947"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11929409/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Evaluation of a Deep Learning Algorithm to Differentiate Between Membranes Attached to the Optic Disc on Ultrasonography.\",\"authors\":\"Vaidehi D Bhatt, Nikhil Shah, Deepak C Bhatt, Supriya Dabir, Jay Sheth, Tos T J M Berendschot, Roel J Erckens, Carroll A B Webers\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OPTH.S501316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to create and test a deep learning algorithm that could identify and distinguish between membranes attached to optic disc [OD; retinal detachment (RD)/posterior vitreous detachment (PVD)] based on ocular ultrasonography (USG).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We obtained a database of B-scan ultrasonography from a high-volume imaging center. A transformer-based Vision Transformer (ViT) model was employed, pre-trained on ImageNet21K, to classify ultrasound B-scan images into healthy, RD, and PVD. Images were pre-processed using Hugging Face's AutoImage Processor for standardization. Labels were mapped to numerical values, and the dataset was split into training and validation (505 samples), and testing (212 samples) subsets to evaluate model performance. Alternate methods, such as ensemble strategies and object detection pipelines, were explored but showed limited improvement in classification accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AI model demonstrated high classification performance, achieving an accuracy of 98.21% for PVD, 97.22% for RD, and 95.83% for normal cases. Sensitivity was 98.21% for PVD, 96.55% for RD, and 92.86% for normal cases, while specificity reached 95.16%, 100%, and 95.42%, respectively. Despite the overall strong performance, some misclassification occurred, with seven instances of RD being incorrectly labeled as PVD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We developed a transformer-based deep learning algorithm for ocular ultrasonography that accurately identifies membranes attached to the optic disc, distinguishing between RD (97.22% accuracy) and PVD (98.21% accuracy). Despite seven misclassifications, our model demonstrates robust performance and enhances diagnostic efficiency in high-volume imaging settings, thereby facilitating timely referrals and ultimately improving patient outcomes in urgent care scenarios. Overall, this promising innovation shows potential for clinical adoption.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"939-947\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11929409/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S501316\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S501316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是创建和测试一种深度学习算法,该算法可以识别和区分附着在视盘上的膜[OD;视网膜脱离(RD)/玻璃体后脱离(PVD)]基于眼超声(USG)。患者和方法:我们从一个大容量成像中心获得了b超数据库。采用基于变压器的视觉变压器(Vision Transformer, ViT)模型,在ImageNet21K上进行预训练,将b超图像分为健康、RD和PVD。为了标准化,图像使用了hug Face的自动图像处理器进行预处理。将标签映射为数值,并将数据集分为训练和验证(505个样本)和测试(212个样本)子集,以评估模型性能。替代方法,如集成策略和目标检测管道,被探索,但显示有限的提高分类精度。结果:人工智能模型具有较高的分类性能,PVD的准确率为98.21%,RD的准确率为97.22%,正常病例的准确率为95.83%。PVD的敏感性为98.21%,RD为96.55%,正常病例为92.86%,特异性分别为95.16%,100%,95.42%。尽管总体表现良好,但仍发生了一些分类错误,有7例RD被错误地标记为PVD。结论:我们开发了一种基于变压器的眼超声深度学习算法,可以准确识别视盘附着膜,区分RD(97.22%准确率)和PVD(98.21%准确率)。尽管有7个错误分类,我们的模型表现出强大的性能,并提高了在大容量成像环境中的诊断效率,从而促进了及时转诊,并最终改善了紧急护理场景中的患者结果。总的来说,这一有希望的创新显示了临床应用的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and Evaluation of a Deep Learning Algorithm to Differentiate Between Membranes Attached to the Optic Disc on Ultrasonography.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to create and test a deep learning algorithm that could identify and distinguish between membranes attached to optic disc [OD; retinal detachment (RD)/posterior vitreous detachment (PVD)] based on ocular ultrasonography (USG).

Patients and methods: We obtained a database of B-scan ultrasonography from a high-volume imaging center. A transformer-based Vision Transformer (ViT) model was employed, pre-trained on ImageNet21K, to classify ultrasound B-scan images into healthy, RD, and PVD. Images were pre-processed using Hugging Face's AutoImage Processor for standardization. Labels were mapped to numerical values, and the dataset was split into training and validation (505 samples), and testing (212 samples) subsets to evaluate model performance. Alternate methods, such as ensemble strategies and object detection pipelines, were explored but showed limited improvement in classification accuracy.

Results: The AI model demonstrated high classification performance, achieving an accuracy of 98.21% for PVD, 97.22% for RD, and 95.83% for normal cases. Sensitivity was 98.21% for PVD, 96.55% for RD, and 92.86% for normal cases, while specificity reached 95.16%, 100%, and 95.42%, respectively. Despite the overall strong performance, some misclassification occurred, with seven instances of RD being incorrectly labeled as PVD.

Conclusion: We developed a transformer-based deep learning algorithm for ocular ultrasonography that accurately identifies membranes attached to the optic disc, distinguishing between RD (97.22% accuracy) and PVD (98.21% accuracy). Despite seven misclassifications, our model demonstrates robust performance and enhances diagnostic efficiency in high-volume imaging settings, thereby facilitating timely referrals and ultimately improving patient outcomes in urgent care scenarios. Overall, this promising innovation shows potential for clinical adoption.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信