[确定血栓提取成功后脑物质缺血性改变程度对临床预后影响的方法]。

Q3 Medicine
K V Anisimov, N H Gorst, A B Berdalin, A V Kostin, K N Zhuravlev, D V Skrypnik, N A Shamalov
{"title":"[确定血栓提取成功后脑物质缺血性改变程度对临床预后影响的方法]。","authors":"K V Anisimov, N H Gorst, A B Berdalin, A V Kostin, K N Zhuravlev, D V Skrypnik, N A Shamalov","doi":"10.17116/jnevro202512503217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the method of primary assessment of the extent of ischemic changes of the brain matter with the greatest prognostic significance for the clinical outcome of the disease in case of successful thromboextraction (achievement of TICI 2b/3 blood flow).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The retrospective analysis included 90 patients with ischemic stroke in the carotid system, admitted within 0 to 16 hours from the onset of the disease and performed thromboextraction with achieved TICI 2b/3 blood flow. The group with good/satisfactory functional recovery (mRS score 0-3) included 69 patients; the group with poor functional recovery/death (mRS score 4-6) included 21 patients. The study examined the prognostic significance of methods for assessing ischemic changes in native CT images (both by a doctor and using artificial intelligence) and methods for automatic cerebral perfusion analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the ROC analysis results, ROC curves were obtained corresponding to the relationship between the extent of ischemic changes in the brain matter and a good/satisfactory outcome (mRS 0-3). The largest area under the ROC curve was obtained when assessing the volume of brain matter with rCBF <30% (0.861, 95% CI 0.753-0.968, <i>p</i><0.0005) and the ASPECTS score evaluated retrospectively by an expert-level physician (0.846, 95% CI 0.738-0.953, <i>p</i><0.0005). When assessing the T<sub>max</sub>/rCBF of the mismatch, the area under the ROC curve was 0.794 (95% CI 0.639-0.949, <i>p</i>=0.001); for the eASPECTS score 0.764 (95% CI 0.653-0.874, <i>p</i><0.0005); for the volume of the brain matter with early CT signs of ischemia 0.751 (95% CI 0.631-0.872, <i>p</i>=0.001); for the ASPECTS score evaluated prospectively by radiologist on duty 0.777 (95% CI 0.667-0.887, <i>p</i><0.0005); for the volume of the brain matter with T<sub>max</sub> >6 s (0.607, 95% CI 0.457-0.757, <i>p</i>=0.213).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ASPECTS score, eASPECTS, the volume of brain matter with early CT signs of ischemic changes, the volume of brain matter with rCBF <30%, as well as the T<sub>max</sub>/rCBF mismatch value predict the outcome of the disease with a high degree of confidence within the timeframe from 0 to 16 hours. The ASPECTS score assessed by an expert doctor and the volume of the brain substance with rCBF <30% had the greatest prognostic value for the functional outcome. The volume with a T<sub>max</sub> >6 s had the least predictive value. Methods for assessing brain matter using artificial intelligence algorithms (eASPECTS and volume with early signs of ischemia) showed predictive value for the functional outcome comparable to the ASPECTS score obtained by radiologists on duty in routine practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":56370,"journal":{"name":"Zhurnal Nevrologii I Psikhiatrii Imeni S S Korsakova","volume":"125 3. Vyp. 2","pages":"17-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Methods for determining the extent of ischemic changes in brain matter in the prognosis of clinical outcome after successful thromboextraction].\",\"authors\":\"K V Anisimov, N H Gorst, A B Berdalin, A V Kostin, K N Zhuravlev, D V Skrypnik, N A Shamalov\",\"doi\":\"10.17116/jnevro202512503217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the method of primary assessment of the extent of ischemic changes of the brain matter with the greatest prognostic significance for the clinical outcome of the disease in case of successful thromboextraction (achievement of TICI 2b/3 blood flow).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The retrospective analysis included 90 patients with ischemic stroke in the carotid system, admitted within 0 to 16 hours from the onset of the disease and performed thromboextraction with achieved TICI 2b/3 blood flow. The group with good/satisfactory functional recovery (mRS score 0-3) included 69 patients; the group with poor functional recovery/death (mRS score 4-6) included 21 patients. The study examined the prognostic significance of methods for assessing ischemic changes in native CT images (both by a doctor and using artificial intelligence) and methods for automatic cerebral perfusion analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the ROC analysis results, ROC curves were obtained corresponding to the relationship between the extent of ischemic changes in the brain matter and a good/satisfactory outcome (mRS 0-3). The largest area under the ROC curve was obtained when assessing the volume of brain matter with rCBF <30% (0.861, 95% CI 0.753-0.968, <i>p</i><0.0005) and the ASPECTS score evaluated retrospectively by an expert-level physician (0.846, 95% CI 0.738-0.953, <i>p</i><0.0005). When assessing the T<sub>max</sub>/rCBF of the mismatch, the area under the ROC curve was 0.794 (95% CI 0.639-0.949, <i>p</i>=0.001); for the eASPECTS score 0.764 (95% CI 0.653-0.874, <i>p</i><0.0005); for the volume of the brain matter with early CT signs of ischemia 0.751 (95% CI 0.631-0.872, <i>p</i>=0.001); for the ASPECTS score evaluated prospectively by radiologist on duty 0.777 (95% CI 0.667-0.887, <i>p</i><0.0005); for the volume of the brain matter with T<sub>max</sub> >6 s (0.607, 95% CI 0.457-0.757, <i>p</i>=0.213).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ASPECTS score, eASPECTS, the volume of brain matter with early CT signs of ischemic changes, the volume of brain matter with rCBF <30%, as well as the T<sub>max</sub>/rCBF mismatch value predict the outcome of the disease with a high degree of confidence within the timeframe from 0 to 16 hours. The ASPECTS score assessed by an expert doctor and the volume of the brain substance with rCBF <30% had the greatest prognostic value for the functional outcome. The volume with a T<sub>max</sub> >6 s had the least predictive value. Methods for assessing brain matter using artificial intelligence algorithms (eASPECTS and volume with early signs of ischemia) showed predictive value for the functional outcome comparable to the ASPECTS score obtained by radiologists on duty in routine practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zhurnal Nevrologii I Psikhiatrii Imeni S S Korsakova\",\"volume\":\"125 3. Vyp. 2\",\"pages\":\"17-27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zhurnal Nevrologii I Psikhiatrii Imeni S S Korsakova\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro202512503217\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhurnal Nevrologii I Psikhiatrii Imeni S S Korsakova","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro202512503217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨在血栓提取成功(TICI 2b/3血流量达到)的情况下,对疾病临床预后最具预后意义的脑物质缺血性改变程度的初步评估方法。材料和方法:回顾性分析了90例颈动脉系统缺血性卒中患者,这些患者在发病0 ~ 16小时内入院,并在达到TICI 2b/3血流量的情况下进行了血栓提取。功能恢复良好/满意组(mRS评分0 ~ 3分)69例;功能恢复差/死亡组(mRS评分4-6)21例。本研究探讨了原生CT图像中评估缺血变化的方法(由医生和使用人工智能)和自动脑灌注分析方法的预后意义。结果:根据ROC分析结果,得到脑物质缺血改变程度与良好/满意预后(mRS 0-3)之间对应的ROC曲线。以rCBF ppmax/rCBF失配评价脑物质体积时,ROC曲线下面积最大,为0.794 (95% CI 0.639-0.949, p=0.001);easspect评分为0.764 (95% CI 0.653-0.874, pp=0.001);当值放射科医师前瞻性评估的ASPECTS评分为0.777 (95% CI 0.667-0.887, pmax bbb6.0 s (0.607, 95% CI 0.457-0.757, p=0.213)。结论:ASPECTS评分、easspect、有早期CT缺血性改变征象的脑物质体积、rCBF max/rCBF错配值的脑物质体积在0 ~ 16小时内具有较高的置信度预测疾病的预后。专家医生评估的ASPECTS评分和rCBF最大值为bbb60 s的脑物质体积预测价值最低。使用人工智能算法评估脑物质的方法(easspect和早期缺血迹象的体积)显示出与常规实践中值班放射科医生获得的ASPECTS评分相当的功能预后预测价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Methods for determining the extent of ischemic changes in brain matter in the prognosis of clinical outcome after successful thromboextraction].

Objective: To determine the method of primary assessment of the extent of ischemic changes of the brain matter with the greatest prognostic significance for the clinical outcome of the disease in case of successful thromboextraction (achievement of TICI 2b/3 blood flow).

Material and methods: The retrospective analysis included 90 patients with ischemic stroke in the carotid system, admitted within 0 to 16 hours from the onset of the disease and performed thromboextraction with achieved TICI 2b/3 blood flow. The group with good/satisfactory functional recovery (mRS score 0-3) included 69 patients; the group with poor functional recovery/death (mRS score 4-6) included 21 patients. The study examined the prognostic significance of methods for assessing ischemic changes in native CT images (both by a doctor and using artificial intelligence) and methods for automatic cerebral perfusion analysis.

Results: Based on the ROC analysis results, ROC curves were obtained corresponding to the relationship between the extent of ischemic changes in the brain matter and a good/satisfactory outcome (mRS 0-3). The largest area under the ROC curve was obtained when assessing the volume of brain matter with rCBF <30% (0.861, 95% CI 0.753-0.968, p<0.0005) and the ASPECTS score evaluated retrospectively by an expert-level physician (0.846, 95% CI 0.738-0.953, p<0.0005). When assessing the Tmax/rCBF of the mismatch, the area under the ROC curve was 0.794 (95% CI 0.639-0.949, p=0.001); for the eASPECTS score 0.764 (95% CI 0.653-0.874, p<0.0005); for the volume of the brain matter with early CT signs of ischemia 0.751 (95% CI 0.631-0.872, p=0.001); for the ASPECTS score evaluated prospectively by radiologist on duty 0.777 (95% CI 0.667-0.887, p<0.0005); for the volume of the brain matter with Tmax >6 s (0.607, 95% CI 0.457-0.757, p=0.213).

Conclusion: The ASPECTS score, eASPECTS, the volume of brain matter with early CT signs of ischemic changes, the volume of brain matter with rCBF <30%, as well as the Tmax/rCBF mismatch value predict the outcome of the disease with a high degree of confidence within the timeframe from 0 to 16 hours. The ASPECTS score assessed by an expert doctor and the volume of the brain substance with rCBF <30% had the greatest prognostic value for the functional outcome. The volume with a Tmax >6 s had the least predictive value. Methods for assessing brain matter using artificial intelligence algorithms (eASPECTS and volume with early signs of ischemia) showed predictive value for the functional outcome comparable to the ASPECTS score obtained by radiologists on duty in routine practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
287
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Одно из старейших медицинских изданий России, основанное в 1901 году. Создание журнала связано с именами выдающихся деятелей отечественной медицины, вошедших в историю мировой психиатрии и неврологии, – С.С. Корсакова и А.Я. Кожевникова. Широкий диапазон предлагаемых журналом материалов и разнообразие форм их представления привлекают внимание научных работников и врачей, опытных и начинающих медиков, причем не только неврологов и психиатров, но и специалистов смежных областей медицины.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信