外周动脉夹层的比较及预后研究。

IF 5.7 1区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Marie Morard, Benoit Guillon, Romain Bourcier, Sylvain Le Jeune, Benjamin Espinasse, Manuel Laslandes, Alexis F Guedon, Olivier Espitia
{"title":"外周动脉夹层的比较及预后研究。","authors":"Marie Morard, Benoit Guillon, Romain Bourcier, Sylvain Le Jeune, Benjamin Espinasse, Manuel Laslandes, Alexis F Guedon, Olivier Espitia","doi":"10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.03.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Peripheral arterial dissections are uncommon, with cervical artery dissections being the most prevalent type. Comparative data on the evolution of renal, splanchnic, and coronary dissections are scarce. This study aimed to characterise and assess the prognosis of non-aortic arterial dissections based on their anatomical territories.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with dissection of cervical, coronary, renal, or splanchnic arteries from 2017 - 2022 for which the episode was documented at Nantes University Hospital were retrospectively included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 185 patients were included. Compared with other arterial territories, patients with coronary or vertebral dissections were more frequently women (p = .006), patients with vertebral or renal dissections were younger (p = .009), and patients with splanchnic dissections had more heritable connective tissue disorders (HCTDs) (p = .002); these differences were statistically significant for each comparison with the other groups. Cardiovascular risk factors did not statistically significantly differ according to the territory dissected. Ischaemic complications represented 44.8%, 91.7%, 88.2%, and 20.0% for cervical, coronary, renal, and splanchnic dissections, respectively (p < .001). The median follow up time was 19 months (range 1 - 177 months). For all territories, symptomatic recurrence of dissection was observed in 10.3%, and the median time to recurrence was thirty-four months. Symptomatic dissection recurrence rates for patients with a single dissection at diagnosis and for multiple dissections were 6.8% and 22.2%, respectively (p = .030). In the multiple territories dissection group, there were more women (83.3% vs. 34.2%; p < .001), more HCTDs were identified (11.1% vs. 1.9%; p = .024), and patients were younger (p = .049).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients' clinical phenotypes differed according to the territory initially dissected, with a higher frequency of HCTDs in splanchnic dissections. Dissections affecting several beds or territories at diagnosis were associated with a higher rate of recurrence. These data need to be confirmed in large prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":55160,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative and Prognosis Study of Peripheral Arterial Dissections.\",\"authors\":\"Marie Morard, Benoit Guillon, Romain Bourcier, Sylvain Le Jeune, Benjamin Espinasse, Manuel Laslandes, Alexis F Guedon, Olivier Espitia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.03.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Peripheral arterial dissections are uncommon, with cervical artery dissections being the most prevalent type. Comparative data on the evolution of renal, splanchnic, and coronary dissections are scarce. This study aimed to characterise and assess the prognosis of non-aortic arterial dissections based on their anatomical territories.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with dissection of cervical, coronary, renal, or splanchnic arteries from 2017 - 2022 for which the episode was documented at Nantes University Hospital were retrospectively included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 185 patients were included. Compared with other arterial territories, patients with coronary or vertebral dissections were more frequently women (p = .006), patients with vertebral or renal dissections were younger (p = .009), and patients with splanchnic dissections had more heritable connective tissue disorders (HCTDs) (p = .002); these differences were statistically significant for each comparison with the other groups. Cardiovascular risk factors did not statistically significantly differ according to the territory dissected. Ischaemic complications represented 44.8%, 91.7%, 88.2%, and 20.0% for cervical, coronary, renal, and splanchnic dissections, respectively (p < .001). The median follow up time was 19 months (range 1 - 177 months). For all territories, symptomatic recurrence of dissection was observed in 10.3%, and the median time to recurrence was thirty-four months. Symptomatic dissection recurrence rates for patients with a single dissection at diagnosis and for multiple dissections were 6.8% and 22.2%, respectively (p = .030). In the multiple territories dissection group, there were more women (83.3% vs. 34.2%; p < .001), more HCTDs were identified (11.1% vs. 1.9%; p = .024), and patients were younger (p = .049).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients' clinical phenotypes differed according to the territory initially dissected, with a higher frequency of HCTDs in splanchnic dissections. Dissections affecting several beds or territories at diagnosis were associated with a higher rate of recurrence. These data need to be confirmed in large prospective studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.03.016\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.03.016","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:外周动脉夹层并不常见,颈动脉夹层是最常见的类型。关于肾、内脏和冠状动脉夹层演变的比较资料很少。本研究旨在描述和评估基于解剖区域的非主动脉夹层的预后。方法:回顾性纳入2017 - 2022年在南特大学医院记录的颈动脉、冠状动脉、肾动脉或内脏动脉夹层患者。结果:共纳入185例患者。与其他动脉区域相比,冠状动脉或椎体夹层患者中女性较多(p = 0.006),椎体或肾夹层患者较年轻(p = 0.009),内脏夹层患者有较多遗传性结缔组织疾病(HCTDs) (p = 0.002);与其他组相比,这些差异具有统计学意义。不同解剖区域的心血管危险因素无统计学差异。颈椎病、冠状动脉病、肾病、内脏病的缺血性并发症发生率分别为44.8%、91.7%、88.2%、20.0%。(p结论:患者的临床表型因最初解剖的区域不同而不同,内脏病的HCTDs发生率较高。在诊断时影响多个床位或区域的夹层与较高的复发率相关。这些数据需要在大型前瞻性研究中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative and Prognosis Study of Peripheral Arterial Dissections.

Objective: Peripheral arterial dissections are uncommon, with cervical artery dissections being the most prevalent type. Comparative data on the evolution of renal, splanchnic, and coronary dissections are scarce. This study aimed to characterise and assess the prognosis of non-aortic arterial dissections based on their anatomical territories.

Methods: Patients with dissection of cervical, coronary, renal, or splanchnic arteries from 2017 - 2022 for which the episode was documented at Nantes University Hospital were retrospectively included.

Results: A total of 185 patients were included. Compared with other arterial territories, patients with coronary or vertebral dissections were more frequently women (p = .006), patients with vertebral or renal dissections were younger (p = .009), and patients with splanchnic dissections had more heritable connective tissue disorders (HCTDs) (p = .002); these differences were statistically significant for each comparison with the other groups. Cardiovascular risk factors did not statistically significantly differ according to the territory dissected. Ischaemic complications represented 44.8%, 91.7%, 88.2%, and 20.0% for cervical, coronary, renal, and splanchnic dissections, respectively (p < .001). The median follow up time was 19 months (range 1 - 177 months). For all territories, symptomatic recurrence of dissection was observed in 10.3%, and the median time to recurrence was thirty-four months. Symptomatic dissection recurrence rates for patients with a single dissection at diagnosis and for multiple dissections were 6.8% and 22.2%, respectively (p = .030). In the multiple territories dissection group, there were more women (83.3% vs. 34.2%; p < .001), more HCTDs were identified (11.1% vs. 1.9%; p = .024), and patients were younger (p = .049).

Conclusion: Patients' clinical phenotypes differed according to the territory initially dissected, with a higher frequency of HCTDs in splanchnic dissections. Dissections affecting several beds or territories at diagnosis were associated with a higher rate of recurrence. These data need to be confirmed in large prospective studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
471
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery is aimed primarily at vascular surgeons dealing with patients with arterial, venous and lymphatic diseases. Contributions are included on the diagnosis, investigation and management of these vascular disorders. Papers that consider the technical aspects of vascular surgery are encouraged, and the journal includes invited state-of-the-art articles. Reflecting the increasing importance of endovascular techniques in the management of vascular diseases and the value of closer collaboration between the vascular surgeon and the vascular radiologist, the journal has now extended its scope to encompass the growing number of contributions from this exciting field. Articles describing endovascular method and their critical evaluation are included, as well as reports on the emerging technology associated with this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信