锥束计算机体层摄影在蝶窦解剖上的变化。

Patrícia Fernandes Lopes, Tatiana Carvalho, Miguel Furtado
{"title":"锥束计算机体层摄影在蝶窦解剖上的变化。","authors":"Patrícia Fernandes Lopes, Tatiana Carvalho, Miguel Furtado","doi":"10.1016/j.otoeng.2025.512229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The surgical approach to the sphenoid sinus (SS) is one of the most challenging aspects of endoscopic surgery due to its proximity to critical structures. To minimize risks, computed tomography (CT) aids in navigational guidance. Although cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) has lower contrast resolution, it offers improved precision, reduced radiation exposure, and faster imaging, making it a viability as a preoperative tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomly selected 75 patients from 707 who underwent CBCT between January and December 2023. Two observers evaluated SS anatomy with consensus. Statistical analyses were conducted using Excel® and Jamovi®.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Anatomical variations were documented, with prevalence rates as follows: sphenoethmoidal cell (15%); optic nerve (ON) protrusion (21%) and dehiscence (4%); internal carotid artery (ICA) protrusion (31%) and dehiscence (0%); vidian canal (VC) protrusion (39%) and dehiscence (6%); foramen rotundum (FR) protrusion (23%) and dehiscence (5%); anterior clinoid process (ACP) pneumatization (20%); pterygoid process (PP) pneumatization (33%); conchal (1%), presellar (7%), sellar (36%) and postsellar type (56%) SS; and intersphenoidal septum (47%). Statistically significant correlations were observed between ACP pneumatization and ON protrusion (p < 0.001) and dehiscence (p = 0.018), and ICA protrusion (p = 0.001). PP pneumatization was significantly correlated with VC protrusion (p < 0.001) and dehiscence (p = 0.011), and foramen rotundum protrusion (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>Our CBCT findings largely aligned with CT data in existing literature. Due to its faster acquisition and lower radiation exposure, CBCT shows potential as a preoperative evaluation method for assessing the SS.</p>","PeriodicalId":93855,"journal":{"name":"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola","volume":" ","pages":"512229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anatomical variations of sphenoid sinus on cone beam computed tomography.\",\"authors\":\"Patrícia Fernandes Lopes, Tatiana Carvalho, Miguel Furtado\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.otoeng.2025.512229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The surgical approach to the sphenoid sinus (SS) is one of the most challenging aspects of endoscopic surgery due to its proximity to critical structures. To minimize risks, computed tomography (CT) aids in navigational guidance. Although cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) has lower contrast resolution, it offers improved precision, reduced radiation exposure, and faster imaging, making it a viability as a preoperative tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomly selected 75 patients from 707 who underwent CBCT between January and December 2023. Two observers evaluated SS anatomy with consensus. Statistical analyses were conducted using Excel® and Jamovi®.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Anatomical variations were documented, with prevalence rates as follows: sphenoethmoidal cell (15%); optic nerve (ON) protrusion (21%) and dehiscence (4%); internal carotid artery (ICA) protrusion (31%) and dehiscence (0%); vidian canal (VC) protrusion (39%) and dehiscence (6%); foramen rotundum (FR) protrusion (23%) and dehiscence (5%); anterior clinoid process (ACP) pneumatization (20%); pterygoid process (PP) pneumatization (33%); conchal (1%), presellar (7%), sellar (36%) and postsellar type (56%) SS; and intersphenoidal septum (47%). Statistically significant correlations were observed between ACP pneumatization and ON protrusion (p < 0.001) and dehiscence (p = 0.018), and ICA protrusion (p = 0.001). PP pneumatization was significantly correlated with VC protrusion (p < 0.001) and dehiscence (p = 0.011), and foramen rotundum protrusion (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>Our CBCT findings largely aligned with CT data in existing literature. Due to its faster acquisition and lower radiation exposure, CBCT shows potential as a preoperative evaluation method for assessing the SS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"512229\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otoeng.2025.512229\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otoeng.2025.512229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:蝶窦的手术入路是内镜手术中最具挑战性的方面之一,因为它接近关键结构。为了降低风险,计算机断层扫描(CT)有助于导航。尽管锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)的对比度分辨率较低,但它提供了更高的精度、更少的辐射暴露和更快的成像,使其成为一种可行的术前工具。方法:从2023年1月至12月期间接受CBCT检查的707例患者中随机选择75例。两名观察员一致评价SS解剖。采用Excel®和Jamovi®进行统计分析。结果:解剖变异被记录,患病率如下:蝶筛细胞(15%);视神经(ON)突出(21%)和裂裂(4%);颈内动脉(ICA)突出(31%)和开裂(0%);viddian canal (VC)突出(39%)和开裂(6%);圆孔(FR)突出(23%)和开裂(5%);前斜突(ACP)通气(20%);翼状突(PP)气化(33%);鼻窦型(1%)、鞍前型(7%)、鞍前型(36%)和鞍后型(56%);蝶窦间隔(47%)。ACP气化与ON突出之间存在统计学意义上的相关性(p)讨论/结论:我们的CBCT结果与现有文献中的CT数据基本一致。由于其采集速度快,辐射暴露低,CBCT有潜力作为术前评估SS的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anatomical variations of sphenoid sinus on cone beam computed tomography.

Introduction: The surgical approach to the sphenoid sinus (SS) is one of the most challenging aspects of endoscopic surgery due to its proximity to critical structures. To minimize risks, computed tomography (CT) aids in navigational guidance. Although cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) has lower contrast resolution, it offers improved precision, reduced radiation exposure, and faster imaging, making it a viability as a preoperative tool.

Methods: We randomly selected 75 patients from 707 who underwent CBCT between January and December 2023. Two observers evaluated SS anatomy with consensus. Statistical analyses were conducted using Excel® and Jamovi®.

Results: Anatomical variations were documented, with prevalence rates as follows: sphenoethmoidal cell (15%); optic nerve (ON) protrusion (21%) and dehiscence (4%); internal carotid artery (ICA) protrusion (31%) and dehiscence (0%); vidian canal (VC) protrusion (39%) and dehiscence (6%); foramen rotundum (FR) protrusion (23%) and dehiscence (5%); anterior clinoid process (ACP) pneumatization (20%); pterygoid process (PP) pneumatization (33%); conchal (1%), presellar (7%), sellar (36%) and postsellar type (56%) SS; and intersphenoidal septum (47%). Statistically significant correlations were observed between ACP pneumatization and ON protrusion (p < 0.001) and dehiscence (p = 0.018), and ICA protrusion (p = 0.001). PP pneumatization was significantly correlated with VC protrusion (p < 0.001) and dehiscence (p = 0.011), and foramen rotundum protrusion (p < 0.001).

Discussion/conclusion: Our CBCT findings largely aligned with CT data in existing literature. Due to its faster acquisition and lower radiation exposure, CBCT shows potential as a preoperative evaluation method for assessing the SS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信