不同酸对模拟根管中三氧化二矿骨料去除效果的实验室研究。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Stephanie Chan, Paul V. Abbott
{"title":"不同酸对模拟根管中三氧化二矿骨料去除效果的实验室研究。","authors":"Stephanie Chan,&nbsp;Paul V. Abbott","doi":"10.1111/aej.12937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aim was to compare the effectiveness of acids in removing MTA from root canals. Fifty acrylic blocks were filled with MTA and divided into groups – 10% hydrochloric acid; 10% citric acid; 2% acetic acid; 2% carbonic acid and 20% tartaric acid. MTA was removed with the acids, plus ultrasonic tips and rotary files. Outcomes were measured as pre- and post-operative weight differences, luminance differences and working time to regain length or form ledges. Weight differences varied significantly – citric acid was highest; hydrochloric acid was lowest and others were not statistically different from each other. Luminance did not differ significantly between groups but varied significantly with distance from the apex – hydrochloric acid and carbonic acid were lowest at 1 mm from the apex. Working times differed significantly – hydrochloric acid took longer than other acids except citric acid. Overall, the most effective acid was citric acid. The least effective was hydrochloric acid.</p>","PeriodicalId":55581,"journal":{"name":"Australian Endodontic Journal","volume":"51 2","pages":"267-274"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aej.12937","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Laboratory Investigation of the Effectiveness of Different Acids in Removing Mineral Trioxide Aggregate From Simulated Root Canals\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Chan,&nbsp;Paul V. Abbott\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aej.12937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The aim was to compare the effectiveness of acids in removing MTA from root canals. Fifty acrylic blocks were filled with MTA and divided into groups – 10% hydrochloric acid; 10% citric acid; 2% acetic acid; 2% carbonic acid and 20% tartaric acid. MTA was removed with the acids, plus ultrasonic tips and rotary files. Outcomes were measured as pre- and post-operative weight differences, luminance differences and working time to regain length or form ledges. Weight differences varied significantly – citric acid was highest; hydrochloric acid was lowest and others were not statistically different from each other. Luminance did not differ significantly between groups but varied significantly with distance from the apex – hydrochloric acid and carbonic acid were lowest at 1 mm from the apex. Working times differed significantly – hydrochloric acid took longer than other acids except citric acid. Overall, the most effective acid was citric acid. The least effective was hydrochloric acid.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Endodontic Journal\",\"volume\":\"51 2\",\"pages\":\"267-274\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aej.12937\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Endodontic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aej.12937\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aej.12937","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的是比较酸清除根管中MTA的有效性。用MTA填充50个丙烯酸块,分成两组——10%盐酸;10%柠檬酸;2%醋酸;2%的碳酸和20%的酒石酸。MTA与酸一起被去除,再加上超声波尖端和旋转锉。结果测量为术前和术后体重差异、亮度差异和恢复长度或形状突出的工作时间。重量差异显著,柠檬酸最大;盐酸最低,其他均无统计学差异。各组间的亮度差异不显著,但随距离的远近而有显著差异,盐酸和碳酸在距先端1mm处亮度最低。工作时间差别很大——盐酸比除柠檬酸外的其他酸耗时更长。总的来说,最有效的酸是柠檬酸。盐酸的效果最差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Laboratory Investigation of the Effectiveness of Different Acids in Removing Mineral Trioxide Aggregate From Simulated Root Canals

A Laboratory Investigation of the Effectiveness of Different Acids in Removing Mineral Trioxide Aggregate From Simulated Root Canals

The aim was to compare the effectiveness of acids in removing MTA from root canals. Fifty acrylic blocks were filled with MTA and divided into groups – 10% hydrochloric acid; 10% citric acid; 2% acetic acid; 2% carbonic acid and 20% tartaric acid. MTA was removed with the acids, plus ultrasonic tips and rotary files. Outcomes were measured as pre- and post-operative weight differences, luminance differences and working time to regain length or form ledges. Weight differences varied significantly – citric acid was highest; hydrochloric acid was lowest and others were not statistically different from each other. Luminance did not differ significantly between groups but varied significantly with distance from the apex – hydrochloric acid and carbonic acid were lowest at 1 mm from the apex. Working times differed significantly – hydrochloric acid took longer than other acids except citric acid. Overall, the most effective acid was citric acid. The least effective was hydrochloric acid.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Endodontic Journal
Australian Endodontic Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
99
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Endodontic Journal provides a forum for communication in the different fields that encompass endodontics for all specialists and dentists with an interest in the morphology, physiology, and pathology of the human tooth, in particular the dental pulp, root and peri-radicular tissues. The Journal features regular clinical updates, research reports and case reports from authors worldwide, and also publishes meeting abstracts, society news and historical endodontic glimpses. The Australian Endodontic Journal is a publication for dentists in general and specialist practice devoted solely to endodontics. It aims to promote communication in the different fields that encompass endodontics for those dentists who have a special interest in endodontics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信