Lane Kirkland Gillespie, Brittany E Hayes, Tara N Richards
{"title":"在美国残疾大学生中经历并随后报告性侵害。","authors":"Lane Kirkland Gillespie, Brittany E Hayes, Tara N Richards","doi":"10.1037/lhb0000597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We examined whether U.S. college students across multiple disability types were at an increased risk for sexual victimization (compared with students without disability) and whether disability type or registration with the accessibility office was associated with odds of reporting sexual victimization experiences to any campus-designated program/resource.</p><p><strong>Hypotheses: </strong>We predicted (a) students with disabilities will have higher odds of sexual victimization than students without disabilities, (b) student survivors with disabilities will have higher odds of reporting than student survivors without disabilities, and (c) student survivors with disabilities who are registered with the accessibility office will have higher odds of reporting than student survivors with disabilities who are not registered.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study used the 2019 Association of American Universities campus climate survey data (<i>N</i> = 163,190) to examine experiences with and reporting of sexual victimization through a series of mixed-effects logistic regression models. We expected that students with disabilities would be more likely to experience and report sexual victimization and that registration with accessibility services would further increase reporting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students across disability types were more likely than students without disabilities to experience sexual victimization. Among student survivors, students with disabilities were more likely to report their victimization to at least one program/resource than students without disabilities. Student survivors who were registered with the campus accessibility office had a higher likelihood of reporting to each program/resource examined.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings reinforce the importance of collaboration across programs/resources to ensure care to student survivors irrespective of students' points of contact. Given that student survivors with disabilities are reporting, institutions should unpack \"what's working\" and tailor strategies to encourage reporting among student survivors who are less likely to report. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48230,"journal":{"name":"Law and Human Behavior","volume":" ","pages":"140-150"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiencing and subsequently reporting sexual victimization among U.S. college students with disabilities.\",\"authors\":\"Lane Kirkland Gillespie, Brittany E Hayes, Tara N Richards\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/lhb0000597\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We examined whether U.S. college students across multiple disability types were at an increased risk for sexual victimization (compared with students without disability) and whether disability type or registration with the accessibility office was associated with odds of reporting sexual victimization experiences to any campus-designated program/resource.</p><p><strong>Hypotheses: </strong>We predicted (a) students with disabilities will have higher odds of sexual victimization than students without disabilities, (b) student survivors with disabilities will have higher odds of reporting than student survivors without disabilities, and (c) student survivors with disabilities who are registered with the accessibility office will have higher odds of reporting than student survivors with disabilities who are not registered.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study used the 2019 Association of American Universities campus climate survey data (<i>N</i> = 163,190) to examine experiences with and reporting of sexual victimization through a series of mixed-effects logistic regression models. We expected that students with disabilities would be more likely to experience and report sexual victimization and that registration with accessibility services would further increase reporting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students across disability types were more likely than students without disabilities to experience sexual victimization. Among student survivors, students with disabilities were more likely to report their victimization to at least one program/resource than students without disabilities. Student survivors who were registered with the campus accessibility office had a higher likelihood of reporting to each program/resource examined.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings reinforce the importance of collaboration across programs/resources to ensure care to student survivors irrespective of students' points of contact. Given that student survivors with disabilities are reporting, institutions should unpack \\\"what's working\\\" and tailor strategies to encourage reporting among student survivors who are less likely to report. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law and Human Behavior\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"140-150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law and Human Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000597\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law and Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000597","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:我们研究了不同残疾类型的美国大学生是否有更高的性受害风险(与没有残疾的学生相比),以及残疾类型或在无障碍办公室登记是否与向任何校园指定项目/资源报告性受害经历的几率有关。假设:我们预测(a)有残疾的学生比没有残疾的学生有更高的性受害几率,(b)有残疾的学生幸存者比没有残疾的学生幸存者有更高的报告几率,(c)在无障碍办公室登记的残疾学生幸存者比没有登记的残疾学生幸存者有更高的报告几率。方法:本研究利用2019年美国大学协会校园气候调查数据(N = 163,190),通过一系列混合效应逻辑回归模型,研究性受害经历和报告。我们预计残疾学生将更有可能经历和报告性侵害,而无障碍服务的注册将进一步增加报告。结果:不同残疾类型的学生比非残疾学生更容易遭受性侵害。在学生幸存者中,残疾学生比非残疾学生更有可能向至少一个项目/资源报告他们的受害情况。在校园无障碍办公室注册的学生幸存者更有可能向每个检查的项目/资源报告。结论:研究结果强调了跨项目/资源合作的重要性,以确保无论学生的接触点如何,都能照顾到学生幸存者。鉴于有残疾的学生幸存者正在报告,机构应该解开“什么是有效的”,并制定策略,鼓励那些不太可能报告的学生幸存者报告。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
Experiencing and subsequently reporting sexual victimization among U.S. college students with disabilities.
Objective: We examined whether U.S. college students across multiple disability types were at an increased risk for sexual victimization (compared with students without disability) and whether disability type or registration with the accessibility office was associated with odds of reporting sexual victimization experiences to any campus-designated program/resource.
Hypotheses: We predicted (a) students with disabilities will have higher odds of sexual victimization than students without disabilities, (b) student survivors with disabilities will have higher odds of reporting than student survivors without disabilities, and (c) student survivors with disabilities who are registered with the accessibility office will have higher odds of reporting than student survivors with disabilities who are not registered.
Method: This study used the 2019 Association of American Universities campus climate survey data (N = 163,190) to examine experiences with and reporting of sexual victimization through a series of mixed-effects logistic regression models. We expected that students with disabilities would be more likely to experience and report sexual victimization and that registration with accessibility services would further increase reporting.
Results: Students across disability types were more likely than students without disabilities to experience sexual victimization. Among student survivors, students with disabilities were more likely to report their victimization to at least one program/resource than students without disabilities. Student survivors who were registered with the campus accessibility office had a higher likelihood of reporting to each program/resource examined.
Conclusions: Findings reinforce the importance of collaboration across programs/resources to ensure care to student survivors irrespective of students' points of contact. Given that student survivors with disabilities are reporting, institutions should unpack "what's working" and tailor strategies to encourage reporting among student survivors who are less likely to report. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Law and Human Behavior, the official journal of the American Psychology-Law Society/Division 41 of the American Psychological Association, is a multidisciplinary forum for the publication of articles and discussions of issues arising out of the relationships between human behavior and the law, our legal system, and the legal process. This journal publishes original research, reviews of past research, and theoretical studies from professionals in criminal justice, law, psychology, sociology, psychiatry, political science, education, communication, and other areas germane to the field.