Denosumab方案治疗骨巨细胞瘤:荟萃分析的系统回顾。

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Bruno G Barreto, Claudio Santili, Alex Guedes, Fernando D Moreira, Claudio Luiz Dsl Paz
{"title":"Denosumab方案治疗骨巨细胞瘤:荟萃分析的系统回顾。","authors":"Bruno G Barreto, Claudio Santili, Alex Guedes, Fernando D Moreira, Claudio Luiz Dsl Paz","doi":"10.5312/wjo.v16.i3.102520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a rare, locally aggressive neoplasm that should be treated surgically, whenever possible. This treatment approach may be linked with greater morbidity besides functional impairment. Denosumab is a human monoclonal antibody. Its administration inhibits bone resorption and has become part of the therapeutic armamentarium against GCTB, as it allows local control with a view to downstaging for a more conservative surgical procedure. However, there is no consensus in the literature regarding the optimal denosumab regimen for GCTB. Therefore, a wide discussion of denosumab regimen is necessary.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of various therapy protocols employing denosumab in individuals with GCTB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A broad and systematic literature search was carried out using the PRISMA guidelines. We analyzed studies that reported skeletally mature patients with GCTB regardless of sex or ethnicity treated with denosumab. Articles with fewer than five patients and in languages except Spanish, Portuguese and English were excluded. Statistical analysis with proportion meta-analysis was performed due to the dichotomous nature of the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1005 articles were screened, of which 26 articles met the inclusion criteria and were selected, totaling 1742 patients, 51.8% women and 48.2% men, with an average of 35 years of age. Treatment with denosumab was associated with high rates of clinical benefit (CB) and imaging response (IR), without changing local recurrence rates when compared to patients treated without denosumab, regardless of the therapeutic regimen adopted and the number of doses applied. The adverse events (AE) presented were mostly mild, with the exception of a malignant transformation to osteosarcoma.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment of GCTB with denosumab is effective, showing high rates of CB and IR. The AE that occurred were mostly mild. We found no differences between the articles considering the researched outcomes regardless of the therapeutic regimen adopted.</p>","PeriodicalId":47843,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Orthopedics","volume":"16 3","pages":"102520"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11924024/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Denosumab regimens in the treatment of giant cell tumor of bone: A systematic review with meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Bruno G Barreto, Claudio Santili, Alex Guedes, Fernando D Moreira, Claudio Luiz Dsl Paz\",\"doi\":\"10.5312/wjo.v16.i3.102520\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a rare, locally aggressive neoplasm that should be treated surgically, whenever possible. This treatment approach may be linked with greater morbidity besides functional impairment. Denosumab is a human monoclonal antibody. Its administration inhibits bone resorption and has become part of the therapeutic armamentarium against GCTB, as it allows local control with a view to downstaging for a more conservative surgical procedure. However, there is no consensus in the literature regarding the optimal denosumab regimen for GCTB. Therefore, a wide discussion of denosumab regimen is necessary.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of various therapy protocols employing denosumab in individuals with GCTB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A broad and systematic literature search was carried out using the PRISMA guidelines. We analyzed studies that reported skeletally mature patients with GCTB regardless of sex or ethnicity treated with denosumab. Articles with fewer than five patients and in languages except Spanish, Portuguese and English were excluded. Statistical analysis with proportion meta-analysis was performed due to the dichotomous nature of the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1005 articles were screened, of which 26 articles met the inclusion criteria and were selected, totaling 1742 patients, 51.8% women and 48.2% men, with an average of 35 years of age. Treatment with denosumab was associated with high rates of clinical benefit (CB) and imaging response (IR), without changing local recurrence rates when compared to patients treated without denosumab, regardless of the therapeutic regimen adopted and the number of doses applied. The adverse events (AE) presented were mostly mild, with the exception of a malignant transformation to osteosarcoma.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment of GCTB with denosumab is effective, showing high rates of CB and IR. The AE that occurred were mostly mild. We found no differences between the articles considering the researched outcomes regardless of the therapeutic regimen adopted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Orthopedics\",\"volume\":\"16 3\",\"pages\":\"102520\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11924024/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Orthopedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v16.i3.102520\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v16.i3.102520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:骨巨细胞瘤(GCTB)是一种罕见的局部侵袭性肿瘤,应尽可能通过手术治疗。这种治疗方法除了功能损害外,还可能导致更高的发病率。Denosumab是一种人单克隆抗体。它的施用抑制骨吸收,并已成为治疗GCTB的一部分,因为它允许局部控制,以便进行更保守的外科手术。然而,文献中对于治疗GCTB的最佳denosumab方案没有共识。因此,有必要对denosumab方案进行广泛的讨论。目的:评估使用地诺单抗治疗GCTB个体的各种治疗方案的有效性。方法:采用PRISMA指南进行广泛、系统的文献检索。我们分析了用denosumab治疗的骨骼成熟的GCTB患者,不论其性别或种族。患者少于5人,且除西班牙语、葡萄牙语和英语外的其他语言的文章被排除在外。由于数据的二分性,采用比例元分析进行统计分析。结果:共筛选1005篇文章,其中26篇符合纳入标准,入选患者1742例,女性51.8%,男性48.2%,平均年龄35岁。与不使用denosumab治疗的患者相比,使用denosumab治疗与高临床获益(CB)和成像反应(IR)率相关,无论采用何种治疗方案和应用剂量数,都不会改变局部复发率。除了恶性转化为骨肉瘤外,出现的不良事件(AE)大多是轻微的。结论:地诺单抗治疗GCTB疗效显著,CB和IR率均较高。所发生的AE大多是轻微的。我们发现,无论采用何种治疗方案,考虑研究结果的文章之间没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Denosumab regimens in the treatment of giant cell tumor of bone: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Background: Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a rare, locally aggressive neoplasm that should be treated surgically, whenever possible. This treatment approach may be linked with greater morbidity besides functional impairment. Denosumab is a human monoclonal antibody. Its administration inhibits bone resorption and has become part of the therapeutic armamentarium against GCTB, as it allows local control with a view to downstaging for a more conservative surgical procedure. However, there is no consensus in the literature regarding the optimal denosumab regimen for GCTB. Therefore, a wide discussion of denosumab regimen is necessary.

Aim: To assess the effectiveness of various therapy protocols employing denosumab in individuals with GCTB.

Methods: A broad and systematic literature search was carried out using the PRISMA guidelines. We analyzed studies that reported skeletally mature patients with GCTB regardless of sex or ethnicity treated with denosumab. Articles with fewer than five patients and in languages except Spanish, Portuguese and English were excluded. Statistical analysis with proportion meta-analysis was performed due to the dichotomous nature of the data.

Results: 1005 articles were screened, of which 26 articles met the inclusion criteria and were selected, totaling 1742 patients, 51.8% women and 48.2% men, with an average of 35 years of age. Treatment with denosumab was associated with high rates of clinical benefit (CB) and imaging response (IR), without changing local recurrence rates when compared to patients treated without denosumab, regardless of the therapeutic regimen adopted and the number of doses applied. The adverse events (AE) presented were mostly mild, with the exception of a malignant transformation to osteosarcoma.

Conclusion: Treatment of GCTB with denosumab is effective, showing high rates of CB and IR. The AE that occurred were mostly mild. We found no differences between the articles considering the researched outcomes regardless of the therapeutic regimen adopted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
814
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信