基于频率的数字乳腺断层合成图像非高斯特性纹理分析以及两家供应商之间的比较。

IF 1.9 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of Medical Imaging Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1117/1.JMI.12.S2.S22004
Kai Yang, Craig K Abbey, Bruno Barufaldi, Xinhua Li, Theodore A Marschall, Bob Liu
{"title":"基于频率的数字乳腺断层合成图像非高斯特性纹理分析以及两家供应商之间的比较。","authors":"Kai Yang, Craig K Abbey, Bruno Barufaldi, Xinhua Li, Theodore A Marschall, Bob Liu","doi":"10.1117/1.JMI.12.S2.S22004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aim to analyze higher-order textural components of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images to quantify differences in the appearance of breast parenchyma produced by different vendors.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>We included consecutive women who had normal screening DBT exams in January 2018 from a GE system and in adjacent years from Hologic systems. Laplacian fractional entropy (LFE), as a measure of non-Gaussian statistical properties of breast tissue texture, was calculated from for-presentation Craniocaudal (CC) view DBT slices and synthetic mammograms (SMs) through frequency-based filtering with Gabor filters, which were considered mathematical models for human visual response to image textures. The LFE values were compared within and across subjects and vendors along with secondary parameters (laterality, year-to-year, modality, and breast density) via two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests using frequency as one of the two independent variables, and a <math><mrow><mi>P</mi></mrow> </math> -value <math><mrow><mo><</mo> <mn>0.05</mn></mrow> </math> was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8529 CC view DBT slices and SM images from 73 screening exams in 25 women were analyzed. Significant differences in LFE were observed for different frequencies ( <math><mrow><mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.001</mn></mrow> </math> ) and across vendors (GE versus Hologic DBT: <math><mrow><mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.001</mn></mrow> </math> , GE versus Hologic SM: <math><mrow><mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.001</mn></mrow> </math> ).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant differences in perception of breast parenchyma textures among two DBT vendors were demonstrated via higher-order non-Gaussian statistical properties. This finding extends previously observed differences in anatomical noise power spectra in DBT images and provides quantitative evidence to support caution in across-vendor comparative reading and will be beneficial to facilitate future development of vendor-neutral artificial intelligence algorithms for breast cancer screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":47707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging","volume":"12 Suppl 2","pages":"S22004"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11925074/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frequency-based texture analysis of non-Gaussian properties of digital breast tomosynthesis images and comparison across two vendors.\",\"authors\":\"Kai Yang, Craig K Abbey, Bruno Barufaldi, Xinhua Li, Theodore A Marschall, Bob Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/1.JMI.12.S2.S22004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aim to analyze higher-order textural components of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images to quantify differences in the appearance of breast parenchyma produced by different vendors.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>We included consecutive women who had normal screening DBT exams in January 2018 from a GE system and in adjacent years from Hologic systems. Laplacian fractional entropy (LFE), as a measure of non-Gaussian statistical properties of breast tissue texture, was calculated from for-presentation Craniocaudal (CC) view DBT slices and synthetic mammograms (SMs) through frequency-based filtering with Gabor filters, which were considered mathematical models for human visual response to image textures. The LFE values were compared within and across subjects and vendors along with secondary parameters (laterality, year-to-year, modality, and breast density) via two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests using frequency as one of the two independent variables, and a <math><mrow><mi>P</mi></mrow> </math> -value <math><mrow><mo><</mo> <mn>0.05</mn></mrow> </math> was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8529 CC view DBT slices and SM images from 73 screening exams in 25 women were analyzed. Significant differences in LFE were observed for different frequencies ( <math><mrow><mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.001</mn></mrow> </math> ) and across vendors (GE versus Hologic DBT: <math><mrow><mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.001</mn></mrow> </math> , GE versus Hologic SM: <math><mrow><mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.001</mn></mrow> </math> ).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant differences in perception of breast parenchyma textures among two DBT vendors were demonstrated via higher-order non-Gaussian statistical properties. This finding extends previously observed differences in anatomical noise power spectra in DBT images and provides quantitative evidence to support caution in across-vendor comparative reading and will be beneficial to facilitate future development of vendor-neutral artificial intelligence algorithms for breast cancer screening.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging\",\"volume\":\"12 Suppl 2\",\"pages\":\"S22004\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11925074/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.12.S2.S22004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.12.S2.S22004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们旨在分析数字乳腺断层合成(DBT)图像的高阶纹理成分,以量化不同供应商生产的乳腺实质外观的差异。方法:我们纳入了2018年1月GE系统和Hologic系统连续进行正常筛查DBT检查的女性。Laplacian分数熵(LFE)作为乳腺组织纹理非高斯统计特性的度量,通过基于频率的Gabor滤波器滤波,从呈现颅侧(CC)视图的DBT切片和合成乳房x光片(SMs)中计算得到,这被认为是人类视觉响应图像纹理的数学模型。使用频率作为两个自变量之一,通过双向方差分析(ANOVA)检验,比较受试者和供应商内部和之间的LFE值以及次要参数(横向性、年度、模态和乳腺密度),P值0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:共分析了25例女性73次筛查检查的8529张CC视图DBT切片和SM图像。不同频率和不同供应商(GE与Hologic DBT: P 0.001, GE与Hologic SM: P 0.001)的LFE存在显著差异。结论:高阶非高斯统计特性证明了两种DBT供应商对乳腺实质纹理的感知存在显著差异。这一发现扩展了先前观察到的DBT图像中解剖噪声功率谱的差异,并提供了定量证据,支持跨供应商比较阅读的谨慎性,并将有助于促进供应商中立的乳腺癌筛查人工智能算法的未来发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Frequency-based texture analysis of non-Gaussian properties of digital breast tomosynthesis images and comparison across two vendors.

Purpose: We aim to analyze higher-order textural components of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images to quantify differences in the appearance of breast parenchyma produced by different vendors.

Approach: We included consecutive women who had normal screening DBT exams in January 2018 from a GE system and in adjacent years from Hologic systems. Laplacian fractional entropy (LFE), as a measure of non-Gaussian statistical properties of breast tissue texture, was calculated from for-presentation Craniocaudal (CC) view DBT slices and synthetic mammograms (SMs) through frequency-based filtering with Gabor filters, which were considered mathematical models for human visual response to image textures. The LFE values were compared within and across subjects and vendors along with secondary parameters (laterality, year-to-year, modality, and breast density) via two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests using frequency as one of the two independent variables, and a P -value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: A total of 8529 CC view DBT slices and SM images from 73 screening exams in 25 women were analyzed. Significant differences in LFE were observed for different frequencies ( P < 0.001 ) and across vendors (GE versus Hologic DBT: P < 0.001 , GE versus Hologic SM: P < 0.001 ).

Conclusion: Significant differences in perception of breast parenchyma textures among two DBT vendors were demonstrated via higher-order non-Gaussian statistical properties. This finding extends previously observed differences in anatomical noise power spectra in DBT images and provides quantitative evidence to support caution in across-vendor comparative reading and will be beneficial to facilitate future development of vendor-neutral artificial intelligence algorithms for breast cancer screening.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Imaging
Journal of Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JMI covers fundamental and translational research, as well as applications, focused on medical imaging, which continue to yield physical and biomedical advancements in the early detection, diagnostics, and therapy of disease as well as in the understanding of normal. The scope of JMI includes: Imaging physics, Tomographic reconstruction algorithms (such as those in CT and MRI), Image processing and deep learning, Computer-aided diagnosis and quantitative image analysis, Visualization and modeling, Picture archiving and communications systems (PACS), Image perception and observer performance, Technology assessment, Ultrasonic imaging, Image-guided procedures, Digital pathology, Biomedical applications of biomedical imaging. JMI allows for the peer-reviewed communication and archiving of scientific developments, translational and clinical applications, reviews, and recommendations for the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信