以学生为中心的翻转课堂教学在医学解剖学教学中的有效性:一项准实验研究。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY
Clinical Anatomy Pub Date : 2025-03-23 DOI:10.1002/ca.24267
Qianyin Yao, Peiyi Zhu, Xintian Yu, Yatao Cheng, Weigang Cui, Qin Liu
{"title":"以学生为中心的翻转课堂教学在医学解剖学教学中的有效性:一项准实验研究。","authors":"Qianyin Yao,&nbsp;Peiyi Zhu,&nbsp;Xintian Yu,&nbsp;Yatao Cheng,&nbsp;Weigang Cui,&nbsp;Qin Liu","doi":"10.1002/ca.24267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Anatomy, a cornerstone of medical education, is crucial for cultivating clinical skills among medical students. However, traditional anatomy teaching models face challenges such as insufficient learning outcomes and inadequate preparation for clinical application. Flipped Classroom teaching methods, which combine the flexibility of online learning with interactivity within groups, can offer new ways of addressing these challenges. In this quasi-experimental study, a convenience sample of first-year clinical medical students was recruited and divided into an experimental group (EG, <i>n</i> = 67) and a control group (CG, <i>n</i> = 59). The EG received the Flipped Classroom (FC) teaching method, while the CG received traditional Face-to-Face (F2F) teaching throughout an 18-week basic anatomy course. The study compared knowledge proficiency, self-directed learning ability, and classroom participation between the two groups. The results revealed no significant differences in knowledge proficiency scores (<i>t</i> = 0.938, <i>p</i> = 0.35), but students in the EG obtained significantly higher scores for self-directed learning ability (<i>t</i> = 3.078, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) and classroom participation (<i>t</i> = 3.936, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) than students in the CG. Although there were no significant differences in participants' knowledge levels, students who received the Flipped Classroom model improved significantly in self-directed learning ability and classroom participation. This study not only provides practical guidance for educational practice but also offers empirical support for research on educational theory.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50687,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Anatomy","volume":"38 4","pages":"496-504"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effectiveness of the Student-Centered Flipped Classroom Approach in Medical Anatomy Teaching: A Quasi-Experimental Study\",\"authors\":\"Qianyin Yao,&nbsp;Peiyi Zhu,&nbsp;Xintian Yu,&nbsp;Yatao Cheng,&nbsp;Weigang Cui,&nbsp;Qin Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ca.24267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Anatomy, a cornerstone of medical education, is crucial for cultivating clinical skills among medical students. However, traditional anatomy teaching models face challenges such as insufficient learning outcomes and inadequate preparation for clinical application. Flipped Classroom teaching methods, which combine the flexibility of online learning with interactivity within groups, can offer new ways of addressing these challenges. In this quasi-experimental study, a convenience sample of first-year clinical medical students was recruited and divided into an experimental group (EG, <i>n</i> = 67) and a control group (CG, <i>n</i> = 59). The EG received the Flipped Classroom (FC) teaching method, while the CG received traditional Face-to-Face (F2F) teaching throughout an 18-week basic anatomy course. The study compared knowledge proficiency, self-directed learning ability, and classroom participation between the two groups. The results revealed no significant differences in knowledge proficiency scores (<i>t</i> = 0.938, <i>p</i> = 0.35), but students in the EG obtained significantly higher scores for self-directed learning ability (<i>t</i> = 3.078, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) and classroom participation (<i>t</i> = 3.936, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) than students in the CG. Although there were no significant differences in participants' knowledge levels, students who received the Flipped Classroom model improved significantly in self-directed learning ability and classroom participation. This study not only provides practical guidance for educational practice but also offers empirical support for research on educational theory.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Anatomy\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"496-504\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Anatomy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ca.24267\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Anatomy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ca.24267","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

解剖学是医学教育的基石,是培养医学生临床技能的重要环节。然而,传统的解剖学教学模式面临着学习效果不足、临床应用准备不足等挑战。翻转课堂教学方法将在线学习的灵活性与小组内的互动性相结合,可以为应对这些挑战提供新的途径。在准实验研究中,我们方便地招募了一年级临床医学生,并将其分为实验组(EG, n = 67)和对照组(CG, n = 59)。在为期18周的解剖学基础课程中,EG接受翻转课堂(FC)教学方法,而CG接受传统的面对面(F2F)教学。研究比较了两组学生的知识熟练程度、自主学习能力和课堂参与度。结果显示,知识熟练程度得分差异不显著(t = 0.938, p = 0.35),而自主学习能力得分显著高于EG组(t = 3.078, p = 0.35)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effectiveness of the Student-Centered Flipped Classroom Approach in Medical Anatomy Teaching: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Anatomy, a cornerstone of medical education, is crucial for cultivating clinical skills among medical students. However, traditional anatomy teaching models face challenges such as insufficient learning outcomes and inadequate preparation for clinical application. Flipped Classroom teaching methods, which combine the flexibility of online learning with interactivity within groups, can offer new ways of addressing these challenges. In this quasi-experimental study, a convenience sample of first-year clinical medical students was recruited and divided into an experimental group (EG, n = 67) and a control group (CG, n = 59). The EG received the Flipped Classroom (FC) teaching method, while the CG received traditional Face-to-Face (F2F) teaching throughout an 18-week basic anatomy course. The study compared knowledge proficiency, self-directed learning ability, and classroom participation between the two groups. The results revealed no significant differences in knowledge proficiency scores (t = 0.938, p = 0.35), but students in the EG obtained significantly higher scores for self-directed learning ability (t = 3.078, p < 0.05) and classroom participation (t = 3.936, p < 0.001) than students in the CG. Although there were no significant differences in participants' knowledge levels, students who received the Flipped Classroom model improved significantly in self-directed learning ability and classroom participation. This study not only provides practical guidance for educational practice but also offers empirical support for research on educational theory.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Anatomy
Clinical Anatomy 医学-解剖学与形态学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
154
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Anatomy is the Official Journal of the American Association of Clinical Anatomists and the British Association of Clinical Anatomists. The goal of Clinical Anatomy is to provide a medium for the exchange of current information between anatomists and clinicians. This journal embraces anatomy in all its aspects as applied to medical practice. Furthermore, the journal assists physicians and other health care providers in keeping abreast of new methodologies for patient management and informs educators of new developments in clinical anatomy and teaching techniques. Clinical Anatomy publishes original and review articles of scientific, clinical, and educational interest. Papers covering the application of anatomic principles to the solution of clinical problems and/or the application of clinical observations to expand anatomic knowledge are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信