{"title":"基于血糖控制水平和诊断前时间的糖尿病诊断:采用回归不连续方法评估对直接医疗成本的影响。","authors":"Toni Mora, Beatriz Rodríguez-Sánchez","doi":"10.1186/s13561-025-00613-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We estimate the difference in direct healthcare costs of individuals diagnosed with diabetes depending on their glucose level, considering different timespans and subgroups. Using data from administrative registers of 285,450 individuals in Catalonia from 2013 to 2017, we used a fuzzy regression discontinuity design to estimate the causal effect of being diagnosed with diabetes at a given timespan (based on an average glucose value equal to or above 6.5%, the treated group) vs. not (having an average glucose level below the threshold, the control group) on healthcare costs across different timespans (6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 months after the first laboratory test) and distances, in days, between the laboratory test and the doctor's diagnosis. When average glucose level was the only independent parameter and the time until diagnosis was 30 days or less, at the cut-off value (6.5%) healthcare costs were between €3,887 and €5,789 lower for the treated group compared to the control group. Smaller differences were reported as the delay in diagnosis increased, even when additionally controlling for sociodemographic characteristics and health status. Our results highlight the importance of prompt diagnosis and might open the debate about the usefulness of the 6.5% reference value in the blood glucose level as the main diagnostic tool in diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":46936,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Review","volume":"15 1","pages":"26"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931748/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diabetes diagnosis based on glucose control levels and time until diagnosis: a regression discontinuity approach to assess the effect on direct healthcare costs.\",\"authors\":\"Toni Mora, Beatriz Rodríguez-Sánchez\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13561-025-00613-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We estimate the difference in direct healthcare costs of individuals diagnosed with diabetes depending on their glucose level, considering different timespans and subgroups. Using data from administrative registers of 285,450 individuals in Catalonia from 2013 to 2017, we used a fuzzy regression discontinuity design to estimate the causal effect of being diagnosed with diabetes at a given timespan (based on an average glucose value equal to or above 6.5%, the treated group) vs. not (having an average glucose level below the threshold, the control group) on healthcare costs across different timespans (6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 months after the first laboratory test) and distances, in days, between the laboratory test and the doctor's diagnosis. When average glucose level was the only independent parameter and the time until diagnosis was 30 days or less, at the cut-off value (6.5%) healthcare costs were between €3,887 and €5,789 lower for the treated group compared to the control group. Smaller differences were reported as the delay in diagnosis increased, even when additionally controlling for sociodemographic characteristics and health status. Our results highlight the importance of prompt diagnosis and might open the debate about the usefulness of the 6.5% reference value in the blood glucose level as the main diagnostic tool in diabetes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Economics Review\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931748/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Economics Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-025-00613-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Economics Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-025-00613-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diabetes diagnosis based on glucose control levels and time until diagnosis: a regression discontinuity approach to assess the effect on direct healthcare costs.
We estimate the difference in direct healthcare costs of individuals diagnosed with diabetes depending on their glucose level, considering different timespans and subgroups. Using data from administrative registers of 285,450 individuals in Catalonia from 2013 to 2017, we used a fuzzy regression discontinuity design to estimate the causal effect of being diagnosed with diabetes at a given timespan (based on an average glucose value equal to or above 6.5%, the treated group) vs. not (having an average glucose level below the threshold, the control group) on healthcare costs across different timespans (6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 months after the first laboratory test) and distances, in days, between the laboratory test and the doctor's diagnosis. When average glucose level was the only independent parameter and the time until diagnosis was 30 days or less, at the cut-off value (6.5%) healthcare costs were between €3,887 and €5,789 lower for the treated group compared to the control group. Smaller differences were reported as the delay in diagnosis increased, even when additionally controlling for sociodemographic characteristics and health status. Our results highlight the importance of prompt diagnosis and might open the debate about the usefulness of the 6.5% reference value in the blood glucose level as the main diagnostic tool in diabetes.
期刊介绍:
Health Economics Review is an international high-quality journal covering all fields of Health Economics. A broad range of theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy with a health economic focus will be considered for publication. Its scope includes macro- and microeconomics of health care financing, health insurance and reimbursement as well as health economic evaluation, health services research and health policy analysis. Further research topics are the individual and institutional aspects of health care management and the growing importance of health care in developing countries.