一种定量测定三焦人工晶状体离体的新方法。

Q4 Medicine
Juan José Moreno, Virgilio Galvis, Mariana Salazar, Sylvia Juliana Villamizar, Nathaly Leal, Alejandro Tello
{"title":"一种定量测定三焦人工晶状体离体的新方法。","authors":"Juan José Moreno, Virgilio Galvis, Mariana Salazar, Sylvia Juliana Villamizar, Nathaly Leal, Alejandro Tello","doi":"10.31348/2025/10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This pilot study aims to present a novel method for quantitatively assessing the decentration of a trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) (Acrysof IQ PanOptix®) relative to three ocular reference points: the visual axis (first Purkinje reflex), the photopic pupil center, and, for the first time, the corneal geometric center. Additionally, the study evaluates the influence of postoperative chord mu, chord alpha, and the distances of the IOL from these reference points on visual outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective, observational study included 18 eyes from 12 patients who underwent cataract surgery with PanOptix® IOL implantation. Postoperative IOL positioning was assessed using OPD-Scan III images, applying a novel approach that combines diffuse frontal and retroillumination views. Distances between the IOL center and three ocular reference points, including the corneal geometric center, were measured, and postoperative patient satisfaction was evaluated using the Catquest-9SF survey. Statistical analyses were performed to assess correlations among reference distances, chord measurements, and visual performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found that in 72.2% of cases, the IOL center was closer to the visual axis than to the corneal geometric center. A greater distance between the IOL and the corneal geometric center was associated with an improved near-vision area under the visual acuity defocus curve. However, no significant correlations were found between chord mu or chord alpha and visual outcomes, patient symptoms, or satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This new approach to determining IOL centration proved practical, showing that the PanOptix® IOL tends to remain close to the visual axis over time, aligning with the surgeon's initial placement. No clear associations were found between chord mu, chord alpha, or most IOL distances (except the distance to the corneal geometric center) and visual quality or patient satisfaction. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and to refine selection criteria for multifocal IOLs to enhance patient satisfaction and visual outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":39839,"journal":{"name":"Ceska a Slovenska Oftalmologie","volume":"81 Ahead of Print","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Presentation of a New Method for Quantitative Determination of Trifocal Intraocular Lens Decentration.\",\"authors\":\"Juan José Moreno, Virgilio Galvis, Mariana Salazar, Sylvia Juliana Villamizar, Nathaly Leal, Alejandro Tello\",\"doi\":\"10.31348/2025/10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This pilot study aims to present a novel method for quantitatively assessing the decentration of a trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) (Acrysof IQ PanOptix®) relative to three ocular reference points: the visual axis (first Purkinje reflex), the photopic pupil center, and, for the first time, the corneal geometric center. Additionally, the study evaluates the influence of postoperative chord mu, chord alpha, and the distances of the IOL from these reference points on visual outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective, observational study included 18 eyes from 12 patients who underwent cataract surgery with PanOptix® IOL implantation. Postoperative IOL positioning was assessed using OPD-Scan III images, applying a novel approach that combines diffuse frontal and retroillumination views. Distances between the IOL center and three ocular reference points, including the corneal geometric center, were measured, and postoperative patient satisfaction was evaluated using the Catquest-9SF survey. Statistical analyses were performed to assess correlations among reference distances, chord measurements, and visual performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found that in 72.2% of cases, the IOL center was closer to the visual axis than to the corneal geometric center. A greater distance between the IOL and the corneal geometric center was associated with an improved near-vision area under the visual acuity defocus curve. However, no significant correlations were found between chord mu or chord alpha and visual outcomes, patient symptoms, or satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This new approach to determining IOL centration proved practical, showing that the PanOptix® IOL tends to remain close to the visual axis over time, aligning with the surgeon's initial placement. No clear associations were found between chord mu, chord alpha, or most IOL distances (except the distance to the corneal geometric center) and visual quality or patient satisfaction. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and to refine selection criteria for multifocal IOLs to enhance patient satisfaction and visual outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ceska a Slovenska Oftalmologie\",\"volume\":\"81 Ahead of Print\",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ceska a Slovenska Oftalmologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31348/2025/10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ceska a Slovenska Oftalmologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31348/2025/10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本初步研究旨在提出一种定量评估三焦人工晶状体(IOL) (Acrysof IQ PanOptix®)相对于三个眼参考点的分散的新方法:视轴(第一浦肯野反射)、光瞳中心和角膜几何中心。此外,本研究还评估了术后弦mu、弦alpha以及人工晶状体距这些参考点的距离对视力结果的影响。材料和方法:本回顾性观察性研究包括12例行PanOptix®人工晶体植入术的白内障患者的18只眼。使用OPD-Scan III图像评估术后IOL的定位,采用一种结合漫反射正面和反向照明视图的新方法。测量人工晶状体中心与三个眼参考点(包括角膜几何中心)之间的距离,并使用Catquest-9SF调查评估术后患者满意度。进行统计分析以评估参考距离、和弦测量和视觉表现之间的相关性。结果:研究发现,72.2%的病例中,人工晶状体中心更靠近视轴而不是角膜几何中心。人工晶状体与角膜几何中心之间的距离越远,在视力离焦曲线下的近视力区域越好。然而,弦mu或弦alpha与视觉结果、患者症状或满意度之间没有显著相关性。结论:这种确定人工晶状体位置的新方法被证明是实用的,表明PanOptix®人工晶状体随着时间的推移倾向于保持靠近视轴,与外科医生的初始位置一致。弦mu、弦alpha或大多数IOL距离(除了到角膜几何中心的距离)与视觉质量或患者满意度之间没有明显的关联。需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现,并完善多焦点人工晶体的选择标准,以提高患者的满意度和视力结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Presentation of a New Method for Quantitative Determination of Trifocal Intraocular Lens Decentration.

Aims: This pilot study aims to present a novel method for quantitatively assessing the decentration of a trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) (Acrysof IQ PanOptix®) relative to three ocular reference points: the visual axis (first Purkinje reflex), the photopic pupil center, and, for the first time, the corneal geometric center. Additionally, the study evaluates the influence of postoperative chord mu, chord alpha, and the distances of the IOL from these reference points on visual outcomes.

Materials and methods: This retrospective, observational study included 18 eyes from 12 patients who underwent cataract surgery with PanOptix® IOL implantation. Postoperative IOL positioning was assessed using OPD-Scan III images, applying a novel approach that combines diffuse frontal and retroillumination views. Distances between the IOL center and three ocular reference points, including the corneal geometric center, were measured, and postoperative patient satisfaction was evaluated using the Catquest-9SF survey. Statistical analyses were performed to assess correlations among reference distances, chord measurements, and visual performance.

Results: The study found that in 72.2% of cases, the IOL center was closer to the visual axis than to the corneal geometric center. A greater distance between the IOL and the corneal geometric center was associated with an improved near-vision area under the visual acuity defocus curve. However, no significant correlations were found between chord mu or chord alpha and visual outcomes, patient symptoms, or satisfaction.

Conclusion: This new approach to determining IOL centration proved practical, showing that the PanOptix® IOL tends to remain close to the visual axis over time, aligning with the surgeon's initial placement. No clear associations were found between chord mu, chord alpha, or most IOL distances (except the distance to the corneal geometric center) and visual quality or patient satisfaction. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and to refine selection criteria for multifocal IOLs to enhance patient satisfaction and visual outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ceska a Slovenska Oftalmologie
Ceska a Slovenska Oftalmologie Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: - Redakce přijímá pouze práce vyhovující po odborné stránce, které jsou na odpovídající profesionální a formální úrovni. - Uveřejněná práce se stává majetkem časopisu, přetisknout její část nebo obrázek lze jen s citací původu. - Rukopis zasílejte v originále a dobře čitelné kopii (je nutná také kopie tabulek, legend, podle možnosti i obrázků). - Listy číslujte v pravém horním rohu a spojujte svorkou, nesešívejte. Přijímáme práce psané na jedné straně kvalitního bílého nelesklého papíru formátu A4 (neprůklepový) na psacím stroji nebo počítači s obvyklými typy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信