约旦初级卫生保健中精神药物处方的模式和适当性。

IF 2 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pharmacy Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.3390/pharmacy13020044
Derar H Abdel-Qader, Alia Saleh, Abdullah Albassam, Esra' Taybeh, Nadia Al Mazrouei, Khalid Awad Al-Kubaisi, Rana Ibrahim, Reham Aljalamdeh, Salim Hamadi, Sahar Jaradat, Shorouq Al-Omoush
{"title":"约旦初级卫生保健中精神药物处方的模式和适当性。","authors":"Derar H Abdel-Qader, Alia Saleh, Abdullah Albassam, Esra' Taybeh, Nadia Al Mazrouei, Khalid Awad Al-Kubaisi, Rana Ibrahim, Reham Aljalamdeh, Salim Hamadi, Sahar Jaradat, Shorouq Al-Omoush","doi":"10.3390/pharmacy13020044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although psychotropic medications (PMs) have enormous adverse events and may cause serious harm if administered inappropriately, there is a scarcity of research concerning the patterns and appropriateness of prescribing these medications in primary care in Jordan. This study aimed to investigate the patterns and appropriateness of PM prescription in primary care, as well as the types and frequency of pharmacist interventions in community pharmacies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was conducted in 16 community pharmacies across Jordan. A data reporting sheet was developed, validated, piloted to ensure its applicability, and filled out over 12 weeks (April to June 2023), covering three regions in Jordan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 426 patients with 469 prescriptions containing 919 PM orders were observed. Among the PMs prescribed, 19.4% were prescribed inappropriately. Among the PMs, 78.7% were dispensed by pharmacists. The inappropriate prescription categories (n = 178) were overprescribing (45, 25.3%), underprescribing (19, 10.7%), inappropriate medication choice (39, 21.9%), inappropriate duration of medication therapy (64, 36.0%), and inappropriate medication dosage (11, 6.2%). The top therapeutic category requested was anti-epileptics (23.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study evaluated the prescribing patterns and appropriateness of PMs in Jordan, revealing notable instances of inappropriate PM prescriptions alongside varied and extensive pharmacist interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":30544,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932190/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patterns and Appropriateness of Psychotropic Medications Prescribing in Primary Healthcare in Jordan.\",\"authors\":\"Derar H Abdel-Qader, Alia Saleh, Abdullah Albassam, Esra' Taybeh, Nadia Al Mazrouei, Khalid Awad Al-Kubaisi, Rana Ibrahim, Reham Aljalamdeh, Salim Hamadi, Sahar Jaradat, Shorouq Al-Omoush\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/pharmacy13020044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although psychotropic medications (PMs) have enormous adverse events and may cause serious harm if administered inappropriately, there is a scarcity of research concerning the patterns and appropriateness of prescribing these medications in primary care in Jordan. This study aimed to investigate the patterns and appropriateness of PM prescription in primary care, as well as the types and frequency of pharmacist interventions in community pharmacies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was conducted in 16 community pharmacies across Jordan. A data reporting sheet was developed, validated, piloted to ensure its applicability, and filled out over 12 weeks (April to June 2023), covering three regions in Jordan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 426 patients with 469 prescriptions containing 919 PM orders were observed. Among the PMs prescribed, 19.4% were prescribed inappropriately. Among the PMs, 78.7% were dispensed by pharmacists. The inappropriate prescription categories (n = 178) were overprescribing (45, 25.3%), underprescribing (19, 10.7%), inappropriate medication choice (39, 21.9%), inappropriate duration of medication therapy (64, 36.0%), and inappropriate medication dosage (11, 6.2%). The top therapeutic category requested was anti-epileptics (23.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study evaluated the prescribing patterns and appropriateness of PMs in Jordan, revealing notable instances of inappropriate PM prescriptions alongside varied and extensive pharmacist interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932190/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy13020044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy13020044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然精神药物(PMs)有巨大的不良事件,如果使用不当可能会造成严重伤害,但在约旦初级保健中,关于这些药物的处方模式和适当性的研究很少。本研究旨在调查初级保健PM处方的模式和适当性,以及社区药房药师干预的类型和频率。方法:对约旦16家社区药店进行前瞻性观察研究。开发、验证和试点了一份数据报告表,以确保其适用性,并在12周(2023年4月至6月)内填写,涵盖约旦的三个地区。结果:共观察到426例患者,469张处方,919个PM订单。处方用药不当的占19.4%。其中78.7%由药师配药。不适宜处方类别(n = 178)为:处方过量(45,25.3%)、处方不足(19,10.7%)、药物选择不适宜(39,21.9%)、用药时间不适宜(64,36.0%)、用药剂量不适宜(11,6.2%)。申请最多的治疗类别是抗癫痫药(23.9%)。结论:本研究评估了约旦PM的处方模式和适当性,揭示了不适当PM处方以及各种广泛的药剂师干预的显着实例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patterns and Appropriateness of Psychotropic Medications Prescribing in Primary Healthcare in Jordan.

Background: Although psychotropic medications (PMs) have enormous adverse events and may cause serious harm if administered inappropriately, there is a scarcity of research concerning the patterns and appropriateness of prescribing these medications in primary care in Jordan. This study aimed to investigate the patterns and appropriateness of PM prescription in primary care, as well as the types and frequency of pharmacist interventions in community pharmacies.

Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in 16 community pharmacies across Jordan. A data reporting sheet was developed, validated, piloted to ensure its applicability, and filled out over 12 weeks (April to June 2023), covering three regions in Jordan.

Results: Overall, 426 patients with 469 prescriptions containing 919 PM orders were observed. Among the PMs prescribed, 19.4% were prescribed inappropriately. Among the PMs, 78.7% were dispensed by pharmacists. The inappropriate prescription categories (n = 178) were overprescribing (45, 25.3%), underprescribing (19, 10.7%), inappropriate medication choice (39, 21.9%), inappropriate duration of medication therapy (64, 36.0%), and inappropriate medication dosage (11, 6.2%). The top therapeutic category requested was anti-epileptics (23.9%).

Conclusions: This study evaluated the prescribing patterns and appropriateness of PMs in Jordan, revealing notable instances of inappropriate PM prescriptions alongside varied and extensive pharmacist interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacy
Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
9.10%
发文量
141
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信