基于能量的甲状腺切除术技术的比较研究:谐波聚焦、结扎小颌和单一机构的传统技术。

Q4 Medicine
Raad Saad Al Saffar, Samer Makki Mohamed Al Hakkak, Ali Abood Alnajim, Maryam Samer Al Hakkak
{"title":"基于能量的甲状腺切除术技术的比较研究:谐波聚焦、结扎小颌和单一机构的传统技术。","authors":"Raad Saad Al Saffar, Samer Makki Mohamed Al Hakkak, Ali Abood Alnajim, Maryam Samer Al Hakkak","doi":"10.36740/WLek/200406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Aim: This study aims to evaluate the exact and harmonic focus of ligature with the traditional suture ligation approach with respect to surgical problems, hospital stay, drainage volume, and time spent in the operating room during open thyroidectomy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Materials and Methods: Between February 2018 and March 2020, 180 patients suffering from thyroid disease underwent an open total thyroidectomy at Al-Sader Medical City's general surgery department. These patients were divided into three groups at random: 60 patients were assigned to Group 1 (Ligasure precise) (LS), 60 patients to Group 2 (harmonic FOUCS) (HF), and 60 patients to Group 3 conventional (CAT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results: Regarding age, sex, or histological diagnosis, the three groups did not differ statistically significantly. The mean operative time for the Ligasure (LS) group was 34 minutes, while the Harmonic focus (HF) group was 38 minutes, which was less than that of the Conventional technique (CAT) group. The CAT group had a significantly larger mean drainage volume than the other 2 groups (P<0.001). The three groups' postoperative hypocalcaemia levels did not differ statistically significantly. (p= n.s.). The HF group had a shorter mean hospital stay than the LS group, while the CAT group had the longest hospital stay (P <0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conclusions: LigaSure Precise and Harmonic FOUCS are energy-based technologies that are equally safe and efficient when used for vascular dissection.</p>","PeriodicalId":23643,"journal":{"name":"Wiadomosci lekarskie","volume":"78 2","pages":"376-380"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of energy-based technologies in thyroidectomy: Harmonic focus, ligasure tiny jaw, and conventional techniques at a single institution.\",\"authors\":\"Raad Saad Al Saffar, Samer Makki Mohamed Al Hakkak, Ali Abood Alnajim, Maryam Samer Al Hakkak\",\"doi\":\"10.36740/WLek/200406\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Aim: This study aims to evaluate the exact and harmonic focus of ligature with the traditional suture ligation approach with respect to surgical problems, hospital stay, drainage volume, and time spent in the operating room during open thyroidectomy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Materials and Methods: Between February 2018 and March 2020, 180 patients suffering from thyroid disease underwent an open total thyroidectomy at Al-Sader Medical City's general surgery department. These patients were divided into three groups at random: 60 patients were assigned to Group 1 (Ligasure precise) (LS), 60 patients to Group 2 (harmonic FOUCS) (HF), and 60 patients to Group 3 conventional (CAT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results: Regarding age, sex, or histological diagnosis, the three groups did not differ statistically significantly. The mean operative time for the Ligasure (LS) group was 34 minutes, while the Harmonic focus (HF) group was 38 minutes, which was less than that of the Conventional technique (CAT) group. The CAT group had a significantly larger mean drainage volume than the other 2 groups (P<0.001). The three groups' postoperative hypocalcaemia levels did not differ statistically significantly. (p= n.s.). The HF group had a shorter mean hospital stay than the LS group, while the CAT group had the longest hospital stay (P <0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conclusions: LigaSure Precise and Harmonic FOUCS are energy-based technologies that are equally safe and efficient when used for vascular dissection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wiadomosci lekarskie\",\"volume\":\"78 2\",\"pages\":\"376-380\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wiadomosci lekarskie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36740/WLek/200406\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiadomosci lekarskie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36740/WLek/200406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评价传统缝合结扎入路在开放性甲状腺切除术中结扎焦点的准确性和协调性、手术问题、住院时间、引流量和手术时间。患者和方法:材料和方法:2018年2月至2020年3月,180名甲状腺疾病患者在Al-Sader Medical City的普通外科接受了开放式甲状腺全切除术。这些患者随机分为三组:60例患者被分配到1组(Ligasure precise) (LS), 60例患者被分配到2组(harmonic FOUCS) (HF), 60例患者被分配到3组(CAT)。结果:三组在年龄、性别、组织学诊断等方面差异无统计学意义。Ligasure (LS)组的平均手术时间为34分钟,Harmonic focus (HF)组的平均手术时间为38分钟,均小于常规技术(CAT)组。CAT组的平均引流量明显大于其他两组(p)结论:结论:LigaSure Precise和Harmonic FOUCS是基于能量的技术,用于血管剥离时同样安全有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative study of energy-based technologies in thyroidectomy: Harmonic focus, ligasure tiny jaw, and conventional techniques at a single institution.

Objective: Aim: This study aims to evaluate the exact and harmonic focus of ligature with the traditional suture ligation approach with respect to surgical problems, hospital stay, drainage volume, and time spent in the operating room during open thyroidectomy.

Patients and methods: Materials and Methods: Between February 2018 and March 2020, 180 patients suffering from thyroid disease underwent an open total thyroidectomy at Al-Sader Medical City's general surgery department. These patients were divided into three groups at random: 60 patients were assigned to Group 1 (Ligasure precise) (LS), 60 patients to Group 2 (harmonic FOUCS) (HF), and 60 patients to Group 3 conventional (CAT).

Results: Results: Regarding age, sex, or histological diagnosis, the three groups did not differ statistically significantly. The mean operative time for the Ligasure (LS) group was 34 minutes, while the Harmonic focus (HF) group was 38 minutes, which was less than that of the Conventional technique (CAT) group. The CAT group had a significantly larger mean drainage volume than the other 2 groups (P<0.001). The three groups' postoperative hypocalcaemia levels did not differ statistically significantly. (p= n.s.). The HF group had a shorter mean hospital stay than the LS group, while the CAT group had the longest hospital stay (P <0.05).

Conclusion: Conclusions: LigaSure Precise and Harmonic FOUCS are energy-based technologies that are equally safe and efficient when used for vascular dissection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wiadomosci lekarskie
Wiadomosci lekarskie Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
482
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信