Chun Yan Li, Long Zhong, Dan Gui Chen, Fu Sheng Yao, Hong Yan
{"title":"VRd与VPd在高危新发多发性骨髓瘤诱导治疗中的对比研究","authors":"Chun Yan Li, Long Zhong, Dan Gui Chen, Fu Sheng Yao, Hong Yan","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-85398-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In high-risk newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (HRNDMM), two different induction regimens were evaluated for safety and efficacy: Bortezomib-Pomalidomide-Dexamethasone (VPd) and Bortezomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone (VRd). Newly diagnosed high-risk MM patients(age > 18) were included in this retrospective study, who received VRd and VPd induction therapy between January 2021 and November 2023. All methods of this experiment were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Informed consent has been obtained from all subjects and/or their legal guardians. The Ethics Association of Anqing City Hospital has approved the study on pomadomide in this experiment (Medical Review (2021) No. 27). The evaluation of OS (overall survival), PFS (progression free survival), AE (adverse event) was the secondary endpoints, while the primary endpoint of the study was the overall response rate (ORR) after four cycles of VRd and VPd. Ultimately, 25 patients with VRd and 21 patients with VPd were enrolled. After four cycles of induction, stringent complete, complete, very good partial, partial and overall response rates were 16%/24%/12%/40%/92% with VRd, and 23.81%/33.33%/33.33%/9.52%/100% with VPd. VGPR or better was achieved in 52% of patients receiving VRd compared to 90.47% in those receiving VPd, with a p-value of 0.003. VPd was linked to more cases of skin rash (p = 0.02). For VRd and VPd, the average overall survival time was 27-months and 21-months, respectively (p = 0.801). The PFS was 27-months for VRd and 20-months for VPd (p = 0.116). Median OS and PFS were not defined in both groups. According to our research, the induction of VPd has been found to elicit more profound and superior responses in HRNDMM compared to VRd, thereby establishing its safety. Our results underscore the potential clinical advantage of pomalidomide as first-line therapy and offer more proof of the beneficial efficacy of VPd in the treating of HRNDMM patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"9946"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11929905/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"VRd vs. VPd as induction therapy in high risk newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.\",\"authors\":\"Chun Yan Li, Long Zhong, Dan Gui Chen, Fu Sheng Yao, Hong Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-85398-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In high-risk newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (HRNDMM), two different induction regimens were evaluated for safety and efficacy: Bortezomib-Pomalidomide-Dexamethasone (VPd) and Bortezomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone (VRd). Newly diagnosed high-risk MM patients(age > 18) were included in this retrospective study, who received VRd and VPd induction therapy between January 2021 and November 2023. All methods of this experiment were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Informed consent has been obtained from all subjects and/or their legal guardians. The Ethics Association of Anqing City Hospital has approved the study on pomadomide in this experiment (Medical Review (2021) No. 27). The evaluation of OS (overall survival), PFS (progression free survival), AE (adverse event) was the secondary endpoints, while the primary endpoint of the study was the overall response rate (ORR) after four cycles of VRd and VPd. Ultimately, 25 patients with VRd and 21 patients with VPd were enrolled. After four cycles of induction, stringent complete, complete, very good partial, partial and overall response rates were 16%/24%/12%/40%/92% with VRd, and 23.81%/33.33%/33.33%/9.52%/100% with VPd. VGPR or better was achieved in 52% of patients receiving VRd compared to 90.47% in those receiving VPd, with a p-value of 0.003. VPd was linked to more cases of skin rash (p = 0.02). For VRd and VPd, the average overall survival time was 27-months and 21-months, respectively (p = 0.801). The PFS was 27-months for VRd and 20-months for VPd (p = 0.116). Median OS and PFS were not defined in both groups. According to our research, the induction of VPd has been found to elicit more profound and superior responses in HRNDMM compared to VRd, thereby establishing its safety. Our results underscore the potential clinical advantage of pomalidomide as first-line therapy and offer more proof of the beneficial efficacy of VPd in the treating of HRNDMM patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"9946\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11929905/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-85398-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-85398-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
VRd vs. VPd as induction therapy in high risk newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
In high-risk newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (HRNDMM), two different induction regimens were evaluated for safety and efficacy: Bortezomib-Pomalidomide-Dexamethasone (VPd) and Bortezomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone (VRd). Newly diagnosed high-risk MM patients(age > 18) were included in this retrospective study, who received VRd and VPd induction therapy between January 2021 and November 2023. All methods of this experiment were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Informed consent has been obtained from all subjects and/or their legal guardians. The Ethics Association of Anqing City Hospital has approved the study on pomadomide in this experiment (Medical Review (2021) No. 27). The evaluation of OS (overall survival), PFS (progression free survival), AE (adverse event) was the secondary endpoints, while the primary endpoint of the study was the overall response rate (ORR) after four cycles of VRd and VPd. Ultimately, 25 patients with VRd and 21 patients with VPd were enrolled. After four cycles of induction, stringent complete, complete, very good partial, partial and overall response rates were 16%/24%/12%/40%/92% with VRd, and 23.81%/33.33%/33.33%/9.52%/100% with VPd. VGPR or better was achieved in 52% of patients receiving VRd compared to 90.47% in those receiving VPd, with a p-value of 0.003. VPd was linked to more cases of skin rash (p = 0.02). For VRd and VPd, the average overall survival time was 27-months and 21-months, respectively (p = 0.801). The PFS was 27-months for VRd and 20-months for VPd (p = 0.116). Median OS and PFS were not defined in both groups. According to our research, the induction of VPd has been found to elicit more profound and superior responses in HRNDMM compared to VRd, thereby establishing its safety. Our results underscore the potential clinical advantage of pomalidomide as first-line therapy and offer more proof of the beneficial efficacy of VPd in the treating of HRNDMM patients.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.