Yue An, Liuyang Li, Haoyuan Gao, Zhihao Luo, Yuefang He
{"title":"基于云模型和Dempster Shafer证据理论的多源数据融合地基开挖风险评估。","authors":"Yue An, Liuyang Li, Haoyuan Gao, Zhihao Luo, Yuefang He","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-94628-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Limited data from single source pose a significant constraint on the accuracy of risk assessment conducted during the pre-excavation feasibility analysis stage. In order to address this issue, a risk assessment method that integrates cloud model (CM) with Dempster-Shafer (D-S) evidence theory is proposed. This method carefully selects multi-source risk evaluation indicators from project information and three-dimensional finite element numerical results to create project database and numerical database. By leveraging these databases, the CM generates the membership degrees for various evaluation indicators across different risk levels, which are then transformed into basic probability assignments within the D-S evidence theory. This allows for effective fusion of multi-source risk evaluation indicators achieving comprehensive quantitative evaluation of excavation. A narrow and elongated foundation project is assessed with a risk level of IV (safety) by the proposed approach. The outcomes provide a scientific basis for formulating preventive strategies and managerial decisions about foundation excavation during the pre-excavation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"9894"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11929853/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fusing multiple source data for foundation excavation risk assessment based on cloud model and Dempster Shafer evidence theory.\",\"authors\":\"Yue An, Liuyang Li, Haoyuan Gao, Zhihao Luo, Yuefang He\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-94628-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Limited data from single source pose a significant constraint on the accuracy of risk assessment conducted during the pre-excavation feasibility analysis stage. In order to address this issue, a risk assessment method that integrates cloud model (CM) with Dempster-Shafer (D-S) evidence theory is proposed. This method carefully selects multi-source risk evaluation indicators from project information and three-dimensional finite element numerical results to create project database and numerical database. By leveraging these databases, the CM generates the membership degrees for various evaluation indicators across different risk levels, which are then transformed into basic probability assignments within the D-S evidence theory. This allows for effective fusion of multi-source risk evaluation indicators achieving comprehensive quantitative evaluation of excavation. A narrow and elongated foundation project is assessed with a risk level of IV (safety) by the proposed approach. The outcomes provide a scientific basis for formulating preventive strategies and managerial decisions about foundation excavation during the pre-excavation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"9894\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11929853/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94628-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94628-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fusing multiple source data for foundation excavation risk assessment based on cloud model and Dempster Shafer evidence theory.
Limited data from single source pose a significant constraint on the accuracy of risk assessment conducted during the pre-excavation feasibility analysis stage. In order to address this issue, a risk assessment method that integrates cloud model (CM) with Dempster-Shafer (D-S) evidence theory is proposed. This method carefully selects multi-source risk evaluation indicators from project information and three-dimensional finite element numerical results to create project database and numerical database. By leveraging these databases, the CM generates the membership degrees for various evaluation indicators across different risk levels, which are then transformed into basic probability assignments within the D-S evidence theory. This allows for effective fusion of multi-source risk evaluation indicators achieving comprehensive quantitative evaluation of excavation. A narrow and elongated foundation project is assessed with a risk level of IV (safety) by the proposed approach. The outcomes provide a scientific basis for formulating preventive strategies and managerial decisions about foundation excavation during the pre-excavation.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.