基于云模型和Dempster Shafer证据理论的多源数据融合地基开挖风险评估。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Yue An, Liuyang Li, Haoyuan Gao, Zhihao Luo, Yuefang He
{"title":"基于云模型和Dempster Shafer证据理论的多源数据融合地基开挖风险评估。","authors":"Yue An, Liuyang Li, Haoyuan Gao, Zhihao Luo, Yuefang He","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-94628-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Limited data from single source pose a significant constraint on the accuracy of risk assessment conducted during the pre-excavation feasibility analysis stage. In order to address this issue, a risk assessment method that integrates cloud model (CM) with Dempster-Shafer (D-S) evidence theory is proposed. This method carefully selects multi-source risk evaluation indicators from project information and three-dimensional finite element numerical results to create project database and numerical database. By leveraging these databases, the CM generates the membership degrees for various evaluation indicators across different risk levels, which are then transformed into basic probability assignments within the D-S evidence theory. This allows for effective fusion of multi-source risk evaluation indicators achieving comprehensive quantitative evaluation of excavation. A narrow and elongated foundation project is assessed with a risk level of IV (safety) by the proposed approach. The outcomes provide a scientific basis for formulating preventive strategies and managerial decisions about foundation excavation during the pre-excavation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"9894"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11929853/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fusing multiple source data for foundation excavation risk assessment based on cloud model and Dempster Shafer evidence theory.\",\"authors\":\"Yue An, Liuyang Li, Haoyuan Gao, Zhihao Luo, Yuefang He\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-94628-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Limited data from single source pose a significant constraint on the accuracy of risk assessment conducted during the pre-excavation feasibility analysis stage. In order to address this issue, a risk assessment method that integrates cloud model (CM) with Dempster-Shafer (D-S) evidence theory is proposed. This method carefully selects multi-source risk evaluation indicators from project information and three-dimensional finite element numerical results to create project database and numerical database. By leveraging these databases, the CM generates the membership degrees for various evaluation indicators across different risk levels, which are then transformed into basic probability assignments within the D-S evidence theory. This allows for effective fusion of multi-source risk evaluation indicators achieving comprehensive quantitative evaluation of excavation. A narrow and elongated foundation project is assessed with a risk level of IV (safety) by the proposed approach. The outcomes provide a scientific basis for formulating preventive strategies and managerial decisions about foundation excavation during the pre-excavation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"9894\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11929853/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94628-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94628-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

单一来源的数据有限,严重制约了预开挖可行性分析阶段风险评估的准确性。为了解决这一问题,提出了一种将云模型(CM)与Dempster-Shafer (D-S)证据理论相结合的风险评估方法。该方法从项目信息和三维有限元数值结果中精心选择多源风险评价指标,创建项目数据库和数值数据库。通过利用这些数据库,CM生成不同风险水平的各种评价指标的隶属度,然后将其转换为D-S证据理论中的基本概率分配。这样可以有效融合多源风险评价指标,实现对开挖的综合定量评价。采用建议的方法对一个狭窄和细长的基础项目进行风险级别为IV(安全)的评估。研究结果为基坑开挖前期预防策略的制定和管理决策提供了科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fusing multiple source data for foundation excavation risk assessment based on cloud model and Dempster Shafer evidence theory.

Limited data from single source pose a significant constraint on the accuracy of risk assessment conducted during the pre-excavation feasibility analysis stage. In order to address this issue, a risk assessment method that integrates cloud model (CM) with Dempster-Shafer (D-S) evidence theory is proposed. This method carefully selects multi-source risk evaluation indicators from project information and three-dimensional finite element numerical results to create project database and numerical database. By leveraging these databases, the CM generates the membership degrees for various evaluation indicators across different risk levels, which are then transformed into basic probability assignments within the D-S evidence theory. This allows for effective fusion of multi-source risk evaluation indicators achieving comprehensive quantitative evaluation of excavation. A narrow and elongated foundation project is assessed with a risk level of IV (safety) by the proposed approach. The outcomes provide a scientific basis for formulating preventive strategies and managerial decisions about foundation excavation during the pre-excavation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信