WORKWELL过程评估:对随访12个月和36个月的参与者访谈进行定性数据分析。

IF 2.1 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Rheumatology Advances in Practice Pub Date : 2025-03-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/rap/rkaf034
Simone Battista, Jennifer Parker, Angela Ching, June Culley, Sarah Long, Alison Heard, Alison Hammond, Kathryn Radford, Paula Holland, Terence O'Neill, Karen Walker-Bone, Yeliz Prior
{"title":"WORKWELL过程评估:对随访12个月和36个月的参与者访谈进行定性数据分析。","authors":"Simone Battista, Jennifer Parker, Angela Ching, June Culley, Sarah Long, Alison Heard, Alison Hammond, Kathryn Radford, Paula Holland, Terence O'Neill, Karen Walker-Bone, Yeliz Prior","doi":"10.1093/rap/rkaf034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to qualitatively examine the delivery of the WORKWELL trial, a job retention vocational rehabilitation (JRVR) programme designed to help individuals with inflammatory arthritis (IA) maintain employment. A qualitative process evaluation used the Normalization Process Theory (NPT) to understand participant experiences and identify factors influencing implementation and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected via one-to-one telephone interviews with trial participants at 12 and 36 months. An inductive reflexive thematic analysis was followed by a deductive analysis based on NPT's four constructs (coherence, cognitive participation, collective action and reflexive monitoring).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-two participants (mean age 51.0; 82.3% female) were interviewed, most diagnosed with RA (75.8%). Four secondary themes were generated under NPT constructs. For 'Coherence', themes included 'Exploring the Purpose and Impact of Taking Part in WORKWELL' and 'Questionnaires as Instrument for Reflection'. In 'Cognitive Participation', the theme was 'Commitment and Investment to WORKWELL'. For 'Collective Action', we identified 'Key Actions for Successful WORKWELL', and under 'Reflexive Monitoring', the theme was 'Suggestions for Improving WORKWELL'. These themes reflected participants' mixed feelings about the intervention, finding value in the intervention but highlighting the need for more tailored, timely and relevant content. Workplace support was crucial but often insufficient. Follow-up calls from researchers to ensure questionnaire completion were seen as a way to reflect and monitor their conditions. The pandemic's impact on work environments also influenced outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings suggest that WORKWELL provided work support for participants, though its impact could be enhanced through greater customization, early intervention and stronger workplace engagement.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03942783. Registered on 8 May 2019. ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN61762297. Registered on 13 May 2019. Retrospectively registered.</p>","PeriodicalId":21350,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology Advances in Practice","volume":"9 2","pages":"rkaf034"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11930348/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"WORKWELL process evaluation: qualitative data analyses of the participant interviews at 12- and 36-month follow-ups.\",\"authors\":\"Simone Battista, Jennifer Parker, Angela Ching, June Culley, Sarah Long, Alison Heard, Alison Hammond, Kathryn Radford, Paula Holland, Terence O'Neill, Karen Walker-Bone, Yeliz Prior\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/rap/rkaf034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to qualitatively examine the delivery of the WORKWELL trial, a job retention vocational rehabilitation (JRVR) programme designed to help individuals with inflammatory arthritis (IA) maintain employment. A qualitative process evaluation used the Normalization Process Theory (NPT) to understand participant experiences and identify factors influencing implementation and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected via one-to-one telephone interviews with trial participants at 12 and 36 months. An inductive reflexive thematic analysis was followed by a deductive analysis based on NPT's four constructs (coherence, cognitive participation, collective action and reflexive monitoring).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-two participants (mean age 51.0; 82.3% female) were interviewed, most diagnosed with RA (75.8%). Four secondary themes were generated under NPT constructs. For 'Coherence', themes included 'Exploring the Purpose and Impact of Taking Part in WORKWELL' and 'Questionnaires as Instrument for Reflection'. In 'Cognitive Participation', the theme was 'Commitment and Investment to WORKWELL'. For 'Collective Action', we identified 'Key Actions for Successful WORKWELL', and under 'Reflexive Monitoring', the theme was 'Suggestions for Improving WORKWELL'. These themes reflected participants' mixed feelings about the intervention, finding value in the intervention but highlighting the need for more tailored, timely and relevant content. Workplace support was crucial but often insufficient. Follow-up calls from researchers to ensure questionnaire completion were seen as a way to reflect and monitor their conditions. The pandemic's impact on work environments also influenced outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings suggest that WORKWELL provided work support for participants, though its impact could be enhanced through greater customization, early intervention and stronger workplace engagement.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03942783. Registered on 8 May 2019. ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN61762297. Registered on 13 May 2019. Retrospectively registered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rheumatology Advances in Practice\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"rkaf034\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11930348/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rheumatology Advances in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkaf034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology Advances in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkaf034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的这项研究旨在对 "WORKWELL "试验的实施情况进行定性研究。"WORKWELL "试验是一项工作保留职业康复(JRVR)计划,旨在帮助炎症性关节炎(IA)患者保持就业。定性过程评估采用规范化过程理论(NPT)来了解参与者的经历,并确定影响实施和结果的因素:方法:在 12 个月和 36 个月时,通过一对一电话访谈收集试验参与者的数据。在进行归纳式反思性主题分析后,根据 NPT 的四个结构(一致性、认知参与、集体行动和反思性监控)进行了演绎式分析:62 名参与者(平均年龄 51.0 岁;82.3% 为女性)接受了访谈,其中大多数人被诊断患有 RA(75.8%)。在 NPT 构建下产生了四个二级主题。在 "一致性 "方面,主题包括 "探索参与WORKWELL的目的和影响 "和 "问卷作为反思的工具"。在 "认知参与 "方面,主题为 "对世界工厂的承诺和投资"。在 "集体行动 "中,我们确定了 "WORKWELL 成功的关键行动";在 "反思性监督 "中,主题为 "改进 WORKWELL 的建议"。这些主题反映了参与者对干预措施褒贬不一的看法,他们认为干预措施很有价值,但强调需要更有针对性、更及时和更相关的内容。工作场所的支持至关重要,但往往不够。研究人员为确保调查问卷的完成而打来的后续电话被视为反映和监测他们状况的一种方式。大流行病对工作环境的影响也影响了结果:研究结果表明,WORKWELL为参与者提供了工作支持,但其影响还可以通过进一步定制、早期干预和加强工作场所的参与度来提高:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03942783。注册日期:2019 年 5 月 8 日。ISRCTN 注册表 ISRCTN61762297。注册日期:2019 年 5 月 13 日。追溯注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
WORKWELL process evaluation: qualitative data analyses of the participant interviews at 12- and 36-month follow-ups.

Objectives: This study aimed to qualitatively examine the delivery of the WORKWELL trial, a job retention vocational rehabilitation (JRVR) programme designed to help individuals with inflammatory arthritis (IA) maintain employment. A qualitative process evaluation used the Normalization Process Theory (NPT) to understand participant experiences and identify factors influencing implementation and outcomes.

Methods: Data were collected via one-to-one telephone interviews with trial participants at 12 and 36 months. An inductive reflexive thematic analysis was followed by a deductive analysis based on NPT's four constructs (coherence, cognitive participation, collective action and reflexive monitoring).

Results: Sixty-two participants (mean age 51.0; 82.3% female) were interviewed, most diagnosed with RA (75.8%). Four secondary themes were generated under NPT constructs. For 'Coherence', themes included 'Exploring the Purpose and Impact of Taking Part in WORKWELL' and 'Questionnaires as Instrument for Reflection'. In 'Cognitive Participation', the theme was 'Commitment and Investment to WORKWELL'. For 'Collective Action', we identified 'Key Actions for Successful WORKWELL', and under 'Reflexive Monitoring', the theme was 'Suggestions for Improving WORKWELL'. These themes reflected participants' mixed feelings about the intervention, finding value in the intervention but highlighting the need for more tailored, timely and relevant content. Workplace support was crucial but often insufficient. Follow-up calls from researchers to ensure questionnaire completion were seen as a way to reflect and monitor their conditions. The pandemic's impact on work environments also influenced outcomes.

Conclusion: Findings suggest that WORKWELL provided work support for participants, though its impact could be enhanced through greater customization, early intervention and stronger workplace engagement.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03942783. Registered on 8 May 2019. ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN61762297. Registered on 13 May 2019. Retrospectively registered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rheumatology Advances in Practice
Rheumatology Advances in Practice Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
197
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信