关节内皮质类固醇注射治疗足部和踝关节骨关节炎:系统综述。

IF 2.1 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Rheumatology Advances in Practice Pub Date : 2025-03-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/rap/rkaf030
Katherine Jones, Julie Bruce, Thomas L Lewis, Ciaran N Nolan, Shannon E Munteanu, Hylton B Menz, Michael R Backhouse
{"title":"关节内皮质类固醇注射治疗足部和踝关节骨关节炎:系统综述。","authors":"Katherine Jones, Julie Bruce, Thomas L Lewis, Ciaran N Nolan, Shannon E Munteanu, Hylton B Menz, Michael R Backhouse","doi":"10.1093/rap/rkaf030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Intra-articular corticosteroid injections are commonly used in the management of foot and ankle OA. Although current clinical guidelines advocate the judicious use of corticosteroid injection as an adjunct therapy, none of these recommendations are specific to the foot and ankle. Therefore, the aim of this review is to examine the effectiveness of intra-articular corticosteroid injections in people with foot or ankle OA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four databases (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature [CINAHL], MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL) and one clinical trial register (International Clinical Trials Registry Platform [ICTRP]) were searched from inception to June 2024 for randomized control trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs evaluating corticosteroid injection in the treatment of foot or ankle OA on pre-specified outcomes: pain, function, quality of life, safety (adverse events) and/or cost-effectiveness. Two independent reviewers conducted record screening, data extraction (Cochrane data extraction tool) and assessment of methodological quality (Cochrane Risk of Bias tool [RoB 2.0]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 1711 citations, two RCTs (57 participants, 49% males) were identified. There were no differences in pain or function over 8 weeks after a single injection of intra-articular corticosteroid compared with prolotherapy for treatment of first metatarsal joint OA. Pain and function significantly improved in people having three corticosteroid injections combined with hyaluronic acid compared with corticosteroid injections alone for treatment of post-traumatic subtalar OA. Methodological quality was graded as some concerns in both trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is insufficient evidence to guide the use of intra-articular corticosteroid injections for OA of the foot or ankle. Future robust research is needed to provide reliable evidence for this commonly performed treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":21350,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology Advances in Practice","volume":"9 2","pages":"rkaf030"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11928786/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intra-articular corticosteroid injections for the treatment of people with foot and ankle osteoarthritis: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Katherine Jones, Julie Bruce, Thomas L Lewis, Ciaran N Nolan, Shannon E Munteanu, Hylton B Menz, Michael R Backhouse\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/rap/rkaf030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Intra-articular corticosteroid injections are commonly used in the management of foot and ankle OA. Although current clinical guidelines advocate the judicious use of corticosteroid injection as an adjunct therapy, none of these recommendations are specific to the foot and ankle. Therefore, the aim of this review is to examine the effectiveness of intra-articular corticosteroid injections in people with foot or ankle OA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four databases (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature [CINAHL], MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL) and one clinical trial register (International Clinical Trials Registry Platform [ICTRP]) were searched from inception to June 2024 for randomized control trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs evaluating corticosteroid injection in the treatment of foot or ankle OA on pre-specified outcomes: pain, function, quality of life, safety (adverse events) and/or cost-effectiveness. Two independent reviewers conducted record screening, data extraction (Cochrane data extraction tool) and assessment of methodological quality (Cochrane Risk of Bias tool [RoB 2.0]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 1711 citations, two RCTs (57 participants, 49% males) were identified. There were no differences in pain or function over 8 weeks after a single injection of intra-articular corticosteroid compared with prolotherapy for treatment of first metatarsal joint OA. Pain and function significantly improved in people having three corticosteroid injections combined with hyaluronic acid compared with corticosteroid injections alone for treatment of post-traumatic subtalar OA. Methodological quality was graded as some concerns in both trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is insufficient evidence to guide the use of intra-articular corticosteroid injections for OA of the foot or ankle. Future robust research is needed to provide reliable evidence for this commonly performed treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rheumatology Advances in Practice\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"rkaf030\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11928786/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rheumatology Advances in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkaf030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology Advances in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkaf030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:关节内皮质类固醇注射是治疗足、踝关节骨关节炎的常用方法。虽然目前的临床指南提倡明智地使用皮质类固醇注射作为辅助治疗,但这些建议都不是针对足部和踝关节的。因此,本综述的目的是研究关节内皮质类固醇注射对足部或踝关节OA患者的有效性。方法:检索四个数据库(护理与联合健康文献累积索引[CINAHL], MEDLINE, EMBASE和CENTRAL)和一个临床试验注册库(国际临床试验注册平台[ICTRP]),从成立到2024年6月,随机对照试验(rct)和准rct评估皮质类固醇注射治疗足部或踝关节OA的预先指定结局:疼痛,功能,生活质量,安全性(不良事件)和/或成本效益。两名独立审稿人进行了记录筛选、数据提取(Cochrane数据提取工具)和方法学质量评估(Cochrane风险偏倚工具[RoB 2.0])。结果:从1711篇引文中,确定了2个rct(57名参与者,49%男性)。与前驱治疗相比,单次注射关节内皮质类固醇治疗第一跖关节OA后8周疼痛或功能无差异。与单独注射皮质类固醇治疗创伤后距下骨关节炎相比,三次皮质类固醇联合透明质酸治疗患者的疼痛和功能显著改善。在两项试验中,方法学质量都被列为一些值得关注的问题。结论:没有足够的证据来指导关节内注射皮质类固醇治疗足部或踝关节骨性关节炎。未来需要强有力的研究来为这种常用治疗提供可靠的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intra-articular corticosteroid injections for the treatment of people with foot and ankle osteoarthritis: a systematic review.

Objective: Intra-articular corticosteroid injections are commonly used in the management of foot and ankle OA. Although current clinical guidelines advocate the judicious use of corticosteroid injection as an adjunct therapy, none of these recommendations are specific to the foot and ankle. Therefore, the aim of this review is to examine the effectiveness of intra-articular corticosteroid injections in people with foot or ankle OA.

Methods: Four databases (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature [CINAHL], MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL) and one clinical trial register (International Clinical Trials Registry Platform [ICTRP]) were searched from inception to June 2024 for randomized control trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs evaluating corticosteroid injection in the treatment of foot or ankle OA on pre-specified outcomes: pain, function, quality of life, safety (adverse events) and/or cost-effectiveness. Two independent reviewers conducted record screening, data extraction (Cochrane data extraction tool) and assessment of methodological quality (Cochrane Risk of Bias tool [RoB 2.0]).

Results: From 1711 citations, two RCTs (57 participants, 49% males) were identified. There were no differences in pain or function over 8 weeks after a single injection of intra-articular corticosteroid compared with prolotherapy for treatment of first metatarsal joint OA. Pain and function significantly improved in people having three corticosteroid injections combined with hyaluronic acid compared with corticosteroid injections alone for treatment of post-traumatic subtalar OA. Methodological quality was graded as some concerns in both trials.

Conclusion: There is insufficient evidence to guide the use of intra-articular corticosteroid injections for OA of the foot or ankle. Future robust research is needed to provide reliable evidence for this commonly performed treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rheumatology Advances in Practice
Rheumatology Advances in Practice Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
197
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信