超越证据:心理和制度因素影响动脉导管未闭支架的采用。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Stephen T Dalby, Daniel Fiedorek, Joshua A Daily
{"title":"超越证据:心理和制度因素影响动脉导管未闭支架的采用。","authors":"Stephen T Dalby, Daniel Fiedorek, Joshua A Daily","doi":"10.1007/s00246-025-03837-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In infants with ductal dependent pulmonary blood flow (DDPBF), clinicians face a critical choice between two interventions to secure stable pulmonary circulation: the Blalock-Taussig-Thomas (BTT) shunt and patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) stenting. While the BTT shunt has long been the standard palliative procedure, its risks have prompted interest in less invasive alternatives. This manuscript explores the psychological and institutional factors contributing to the growing preference for PDA stenting over surgical shunting in the management of DDPBF. Cognitive biases, public reporting of surgical outcomes, and family preferences significantly influence clinicians' procedural decisions. Understanding these influences is essential to align clinical decisions with evidence-based practices, ensuring optimal care for patients while maintaining transparency and equity in procedural evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19814,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond the Evidence: Psychological and Institutional Factors Shaping Patent Ductus Arteriosus Stent Adoption.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen T Dalby, Daniel Fiedorek, Joshua A Daily\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00246-025-03837-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In infants with ductal dependent pulmonary blood flow (DDPBF), clinicians face a critical choice between two interventions to secure stable pulmonary circulation: the Blalock-Taussig-Thomas (BTT) shunt and patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) stenting. While the BTT shunt has long been the standard palliative procedure, its risks have prompted interest in less invasive alternatives. This manuscript explores the psychological and institutional factors contributing to the growing preference for PDA stenting over surgical shunting in the management of DDPBF. Cognitive biases, public reporting of surgical outcomes, and family preferences significantly influence clinicians' procedural decisions. Understanding these influences is essential to align clinical decisions with evidence-based practices, ensuring optimal care for patients while maintaining transparency and equity in procedural evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-025-03837-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-025-03837-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于导管依赖肺血流(DDPBF)的婴儿,临床医生面临着两种干预措施之间的关键选择,以确保稳定的肺循环:Blalock-Taussig-Thomas (BTT)分流术和动脉导管未闭(PDA)支架置入。虽然BTT分流术长期以来一直是标准的姑息治疗方法,但其风险促使人们对侵入性较小的替代方法产生了兴趣。本文探讨了在DDPBF的治疗中,PDA支架置入术比手术分流术更受欢迎的心理和制度因素。认知偏差、公开报告手术结果和家庭偏好显著影响临床医生的手术决定。了解这些影响对于使临床决策与循证实践保持一致,确保对患者的最佳护理,同时保持程序评估的透明度和公平性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond the Evidence: Psychological and Institutional Factors Shaping Patent Ductus Arteriosus Stent Adoption.

In infants with ductal dependent pulmonary blood flow (DDPBF), clinicians face a critical choice between two interventions to secure stable pulmonary circulation: the Blalock-Taussig-Thomas (BTT) shunt and patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) stenting. While the BTT shunt has long been the standard palliative procedure, its risks have prompted interest in less invasive alternatives. This manuscript explores the psychological and institutional factors contributing to the growing preference for PDA stenting over surgical shunting in the management of DDPBF. Cognitive biases, public reporting of surgical outcomes, and family preferences significantly influence clinicians' procedural decisions. Understanding these influences is essential to align clinical decisions with evidence-based practices, ensuring optimal care for patients while maintaining transparency and equity in procedural evaluation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Cardiology
Pediatric Cardiology 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
258
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The editor of Pediatric Cardiology welcomes original manuscripts concerning all aspects of heart disease in infants, children, and adolescents, including embryology and anatomy, physiology and pharmacology, biochemistry, pathology, genetics, radiology, clinical aspects, investigative cardiology, electrophysiology and echocardiography, and cardiac surgery. Articles which may include original articles, review articles, letters to the editor etc., must be written in English and must be submitted solely to Pediatric Cardiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信