筛查罕见常染色体非整倍体阳性增加不良妊娠结局的频率和改变临床管理。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Prenatal Diagnosis Pub Date : 2025-03-23 DOI:10.1002/pd.6776
Devika Chawla, D Claire Miller, Summer Pierson, Lyuba Popadic, Francesca Devine, Dallas Reed, Katherine Johansen Taber
{"title":"筛查罕见常染色体非整倍体阳性增加不良妊娠结局的频率和改变临床管理。","authors":"Devika Chawla, D Claire Miller, Summer Pierson, Lyuba Popadic, Francesca Devine, Dallas Reed, Katherine Johansen Taber","doi":"10.1002/pd.6776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Outcomes in pregnancies with rare autosomal aneuploidies (RAAs) are poorly characterized, with most studies having small sample sizes. Here, we describe outcomes and management in a large cohort of pregnancies that screened positive for an RAA (RAA+).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Results of prenatal cell-free DNA screening were linked to de-identified insurance claims data. Diagnosis and procedure codes were used to estimate pregnancy outcomes and management. Relevant covariates in comparative analyses were adjusted using propensity-score matching. Outcomes were statistically compared using Mantel-Haenszel and McNemar's tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 682 RAA+ pregnancies, the rate of live birth was significantly lower (56.7% vs. 78.7%; p < 0.001), and the rates of miscarriage and preterm birth were significantly higher (14.8% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.001; 18.5% vs. 8.9%, p < 0.001; respectively), compared to pregnancies with RAA- results. In pregnancies that screened positive for a rare autosomal trisomy (RAT+) and in which the RAT+ results were known, ultrasounds (mean: 3.7 vs. 2.5, p = 0.002), and pregnancy-specific visits (mean: 6.6 vs. 5.1; p = 0.007) were more frequent compared with pregnancies in which the RAT+ result was unknown.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pregnancies with RAA+ results had higher rates of adverse outcomes compared with those with RAA- results, and awareness of RAA+ results was associated with more intensive monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":20387,"journal":{"name":"Prenatal Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screening Positive for Rare Autosomal Aneuploidies Increases Frequency of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and Alters Clinical Management.\",\"authors\":\"Devika Chawla, D Claire Miller, Summer Pierson, Lyuba Popadic, Francesca Devine, Dallas Reed, Katherine Johansen Taber\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pd.6776\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Outcomes in pregnancies with rare autosomal aneuploidies (RAAs) are poorly characterized, with most studies having small sample sizes. Here, we describe outcomes and management in a large cohort of pregnancies that screened positive for an RAA (RAA+).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Results of prenatal cell-free DNA screening were linked to de-identified insurance claims data. Diagnosis and procedure codes were used to estimate pregnancy outcomes and management. Relevant covariates in comparative analyses were adjusted using propensity-score matching. Outcomes were statistically compared using Mantel-Haenszel and McNemar's tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 682 RAA+ pregnancies, the rate of live birth was significantly lower (56.7% vs. 78.7%; p < 0.001), and the rates of miscarriage and preterm birth were significantly higher (14.8% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.001; 18.5% vs. 8.9%, p < 0.001; respectively), compared to pregnancies with RAA- results. In pregnancies that screened positive for a rare autosomal trisomy (RAT+) and in which the RAT+ results were known, ultrasounds (mean: 3.7 vs. 2.5, p = 0.002), and pregnancy-specific visits (mean: 6.6 vs. 5.1; p = 0.007) were more frequent compared with pregnancies in which the RAT+ result was unknown.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pregnancies with RAA+ results had higher rates of adverse outcomes compared with those with RAA- results, and awareness of RAA+ results was associated with more intensive monitoring.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prenatal Diagnosis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prenatal Diagnosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6776\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prenatal Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6776","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:罕见的常染色体非整倍体(RAAs)妊娠结局特征不明确,大多数研究样本量小。在这里,我们描述了RAA筛查阳性(RAA+)的大量妊娠队列的结果和管理。方法:产前无细胞DNA筛查结果与去识别保险索赔数据相关联。诊断和程序代码用于估计妊娠结局和管理。比较分析中的相关协变量采用倾向-得分匹配进行调整。使用Mantel-Haenszel和McNemar试验对结果进行统计学比较。结果:682例RAA+妊娠中,活产率明显降低(56.7% vs. 78.7%;结论:与RAA-妊娠相比,RAA+妊娠的不良结局发生率更高,对RAA+妊娠的认识与更密切的监测有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Screening Positive for Rare Autosomal Aneuploidies Increases Frequency of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and Alters Clinical Management.

Objective: Outcomes in pregnancies with rare autosomal aneuploidies (RAAs) are poorly characterized, with most studies having small sample sizes. Here, we describe outcomes and management in a large cohort of pregnancies that screened positive for an RAA (RAA+).

Methods: Results of prenatal cell-free DNA screening were linked to de-identified insurance claims data. Diagnosis and procedure codes were used to estimate pregnancy outcomes and management. Relevant covariates in comparative analyses were adjusted using propensity-score matching. Outcomes were statistically compared using Mantel-Haenszel and McNemar's tests.

Results: Among 682 RAA+ pregnancies, the rate of live birth was significantly lower (56.7% vs. 78.7%; p < 0.001), and the rates of miscarriage and preterm birth were significantly higher (14.8% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.001; 18.5% vs. 8.9%, p < 0.001; respectively), compared to pregnancies with RAA- results. In pregnancies that screened positive for a rare autosomal trisomy (RAT+) and in which the RAT+ results were known, ultrasounds (mean: 3.7 vs. 2.5, p = 0.002), and pregnancy-specific visits (mean: 6.6 vs. 5.1; p = 0.007) were more frequent compared with pregnancies in which the RAT+ result was unknown.

Conclusion: Pregnancies with RAA+ results had higher rates of adverse outcomes compared with those with RAA- results, and awareness of RAA+ results was associated with more intensive monitoring.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prenatal Diagnosis
Prenatal Diagnosis 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
204
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Prenatal Diagnosis welcomes submissions in all aspects of prenatal diagnosis with a particular focus on areas in which molecular biology and genetics interface with prenatal care and therapy, encompassing: all aspects of fetal imaging, including sonography and magnetic resonance imaging; prenatal cytogenetics, including molecular studies and array CGH; prenatal screening studies; fetal cells and cell-free nucleic acids in maternal blood and other fluids; preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD); prenatal diagnosis of single gene disorders, including metabolic disorders; fetal therapy; fetal and placental development and pathology; development and evaluation of laboratory services for prenatal diagnosis; psychosocial, legal, ethical and economic aspects of prenatal diagnosis; prenatal genetic counseling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信