使用Spaeth/Richman对比敏感度评估近视的中央和外周对比敏感度。

Q3 Medicine
Oman Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-02-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4103/ojo.ojo_271_23
Parul Ichhpujani, Uday Pratap Singh Parmar, Rohan Bir Singh, Suresh Kumar
{"title":"使用Spaeth/Richman对比敏感度评估近视的中央和外周对比敏感度。","authors":"Parul Ichhpujani, Uday Pratap Singh Parmar, Rohan Bir Singh, Suresh Kumar","doi":"10.4103/ojo.ojo_271_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessing central and peripheral contrast sensitivity (CS) in myopic patients with varying degrees of refractive error using Spaeth/Richman contrast sensitivity test (SPARCS) and compared it with emmetropic individuals.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>CS of 50 consecutive myopic individuals of varying severity was matched with emmetropes using an online CS test, SPARCS, and Pelli-Robson test. Group comparisons for continuously distributed data were made using analysis of variance (ANOVA) when comparing the groups. A <i>post hoc</i> analysis was also done to compare pairs of each group. SPARCS scores were correlated with age and gender.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data of 126 eyes, 96 eyes from 50 myopes and 30 eyes from 15 emmetropes, were analyzed. The total SPARCS scores of Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 75.15 ± 9.59, 76.48 ± 7.74, 74.55 ± 7.48, and 86.43 + 5.3, respectively. Univariate ANOVA analysis revealed a statistically significant difference in total SPARCS score distribution in the three subgroups with myopia (<i>P</i> = 0.048) and between all the groups (<i>P</i> = 0.000). No statistically significant difference was seen between the groups when comparing the individual SPARCS scores with either age or gender.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study concludes that there is a significant difference in the CS in patients with varying severity of myopia and assessing peripheral CS is an important adjunct to central CS.</p>","PeriodicalId":19461,"journal":{"name":"Oman Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"18 1","pages":"16-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11925361/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of central and peripheral contrast sensitivity in myopes using Spaeth/Richman contrast sensitivity.\",\"authors\":\"Parul Ichhpujani, Uday Pratap Singh Parmar, Rohan Bir Singh, Suresh Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ojo.ojo_271_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessing central and peripheral contrast sensitivity (CS) in myopic patients with varying degrees of refractive error using Spaeth/Richman contrast sensitivity test (SPARCS) and compared it with emmetropic individuals.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>CS of 50 consecutive myopic individuals of varying severity was matched with emmetropes using an online CS test, SPARCS, and Pelli-Robson test. Group comparisons for continuously distributed data were made using analysis of variance (ANOVA) when comparing the groups. A <i>post hoc</i> analysis was also done to compare pairs of each group. SPARCS scores were correlated with age and gender.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data of 126 eyes, 96 eyes from 50 myopes and 30 eyes from 15 emmetropes, were analyzed. The total SPARCS scores of Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 75.15 ± 9.59, 76.48 ± 7.74, 74.55 ± 7.48, and 86.43 + 5.3, respectively. Univariate ANOVA analysis revealed a statistically significant difference in total SPARCS score distribution in the three subgroups with myopia (<i>P</i> = 0.048) and between all the groups (<i>P</i> = 0.000). No statistically significant difference was seen between the groups when comparing the individual SPARCS scores with either age or gender.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study concludes that there is a significant difference in the CS in patients with varying severity of myopia and assessing peripheral CS is an important adjunct to central CS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oman Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"16-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11925361/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oman Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ojo.ojo_271_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oman Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ojo.ojo_271_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:应用speth /Richman对比敏感度试验(SPARCS)评估不同程度屈光不正近视患者的中枢和外周对比敏感度(CS),并与屈光不正个体进行比较。材料与方法:采用在线CS测试、SPARCS测试和Pelli-Robson测试对50例不同严重程度的连续近视患者的CS与emmetropes进行匹配。连续分布数据的组间比较在组间比较时采用方差分析(ANOVA)。还进行了事后分析以比较各组的配对。SPARCS评分与年龄、性别相关。结果:对126只眼的资料进行分析,其中近视50只96只眼,近视眼15只30只眼。1、2、3、4组患者SPARCS总分分别为75.15±9.59、76.48±7.74、74.55±7.48、86.43 + 5.3。单因素方差分析显示,3个近视亚组的SPARCS总分分布差异有统计学意义(P = 0.048),组间差异有统计学意义(P = 0.000)。当比较个体SPARCS评分与年龄或性别时,两组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:不同程度近视患者的CS存在显著差异,评估周围CS是中心CS的重要辅助手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of central and peripheral contrast sensitivity in myopes using Spaeth/Richman contrast sensitivity.

Background: Assessing central and peripheral contrast sensitivity (CS) in myopic patients with varying degrees of refractive error using Spaeth/Richman contrast sensitivity test (SPARCS) and compared it with emmetropic individuals.

Materials and methods: CS of 50 consecutive myopic individuals of varying severity was matched with emmetropes using an online CS test, SPARCS, and Pelli-Robson test. Group comparisons for continuously distributed data were made using analysis of variance (ANOVA) when comparing the groups. A post hoc analysis was also done to compare pairs of each group. SPARCS scores were correlated with age and gender.

Results: Data of 126 eyes, 96 eyes from 50 myopes and 30 eyes from 15 emmetropes, were analyzed. The total SPARCS scores of Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 75.15 ± 9.59, 76.48 ± 7.74, 74.55 ± 7.48, and 86.43 + 5.3, respectively. Univariate ANOVA analysis revealed a statistically significant difference in total SPARCS score distribution in the three subgroups with myopia (P = 0.048) and between all the groups (P = 0.000). No statistically significant difference was seen between the groups when comparing the individual SPARCS scores with either age or gender.

Conclusion: The study concludes that there is a significant difference in the CS in patients with varying severity of myopia and assessing peripheral CS is an important adjunct to central CS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oman Journal of Ophthalmology
Oman Journal of Ophthalmology Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊介绍: To provide a platform for scientific expression of the Oman Ophthalmic Society and the international Ophthalmic community and to provide opportunities for free exchange of ideas and information. To serve as a valuable resource for ophthalmologists, eye-care providers including optometrists, orthoptists, other health care professionals and research workers in all aspects of the field of visual science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信