积极积累的国家癌症研究所临床试验网络试验中的烟草评估。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sarah N Price, Stephanie R Land, Kinsey Pebley, Margaret C Fahey, Amanda M Palmer, Marcia H McCall, Pamela J Raper, Alana M Rojewski, Ivana T Croghan, Lynne I Wagner, Benjamin A Toll
{"title":"积极积累的国家癌症研究所临床试验网络试验中的烟草评估。","authors":"Sarah N Price, Stephanie R Land, Kinsey Pebley, Margaret C Fahey, Amanda M Palmer, Marcia H McCall, Pamela J Raper, Alana M Rojewski, Ivana T Croghan, Lynne I Wagner, Benjamin A Toll","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntaf071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tobacco use can adversely affect cancer treatment outcomes, yet routine assessment has not been fully incorporated into oncology clinical trials. In 2012, rates of tobacco use assessment in actively accruing National Cancer Institute (NCI) trials were <30% at enrollment and <5% during follow-up, prompting efforts by the NCI and major oncology associations to promote and standardize tobacco assessment in oncology research and practice (including development of the Cancer Patient Tobacco Use Questionnaire [C-TUQ]). This study was conducted to re-examine assessment patterns in 2022 (including utilization of the C-TUQ) and evaluate progress.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Protocols and forms from 144 actively accruing (as of December 2022) NCI National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) trials were evaluated using a standardized coding instrument.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 144 trials, 49.3% assessed tobacco use at enrollment (43.8% measured cigarettes, 14.8% e-cigarettes, and <12.5% other tobacco products). Approximately 20.8% used at least one C-TUQ question, but only 3.5% used all four core items. Few measured secondhand smoke exposure (3.5%) or quit interest (2.8%). At follow-up, 8.3% assessed any form of tobacco use. Assessment rates were higher in smoking-related cancer trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Almost half of accruing trials did not measure any tobacco use and fewer used the C-TUQ. There was a >70% increase in tobacco use assessment at enrollment and follow-up compared to 2012, an improvement with room for further enhancement. Standardized tobacco use information enhances investigators' ability to estimate cancer treatment efficacy, offer equitable cessation support, and accurately understand the impact of tobacco use on treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>In 2012, few (<30%) cancer clinical trials evaluated tobacco use at enrollment and <5% did so during follow-up, prompting efforts to promote and standardize tobacco assessment in oncology research and practice (including development of the Cancer Patient Tobacco Use Questionnaire [C-TUQ]). The present study builds on this foundational paper and finds an overall increase in tobacco use assessment with room for improvement: 49.3% of trials in 2022 assessed tobacco use at enrollment and 8.3% did so during follow-up. About 20.8% used at least one C-TUQ question, highlighting that tobacco use assessment is not yet fully incorporated into oncology clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tobacco Assessment in Actively Accruing National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Network Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah N Price, Stephanie R Land, Kinsey Pebley, Margaret C Fahey, Amanda M Palmer, Marcia H McCall, Pamela J Raper, Alana M Rojewski, Ivana T Croghan, Lynne I Wagner, Benjamin A Toll\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ntr/ntaf071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tobacco use can adversely affect cancer treatment outcomes, yet routine assessment has not been fully incorporated into oncology clinical trials. In 2012, rates of tobacco use assessment in actively accruing National Cancer Institute (NCI) trials were <30% at enrollment and <5% during follow-up, prompting efforts by the NCI and major oncology associations to promote and standardize tobacco assessment in oncology research and practice (including development of the Cancer Patient Tobacco Use Questionnaire [C-TUQ]). This study was conducted to re-examine assessment patterns in 2022 (including utilization of the C-TUQ) and evaluate progress.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Protocols and forms from 144 actively accruing (as of December 2022) NCI National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) trials were evaluated using a standardized coding instrument.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 144 trials, 49.3% assessed tobacco use at enrollment (43.8% measured cigarettes, 14.8% e-cigarettes, and <12.5% other tobacco products). Approximately 20.8% used at least one C-TUQ question, but only 3.5% used all four core items. Few measured secondhand smoke exposure (3.5%) or quit interest (2.8%). At follow-up, 8.3% assessed any form of tobacco use. Assessment rates were higher in smoking-related cancer trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Almost half of accruing trials did not measure any tobacco use and fewer used the C-TUQ. There was a >70% increase in tobacco use assessment at enrollment and follow-up compared to 2012, an improvement with room for further enhancement. Standardized tobacco use information enhances investigators' ability to estimate cancer treatment efficacy, offer equitable cessation support, and accurately understand the impact of tobacco use on treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>In 2012, few (<30%) cancer clinical trials evaluated tobacco use at enrollment and <5% did so during follow-up, prompting efforts to promote and standardize tobacco assessment in oncology research and practice (including development of the Cancer Patient Tobacco Use Questionnaire [C-TUQ]). The present study builds on this foundational paper and finds an overall increase in tobacco use assessment with room for improvement: 49.3% of trials in 2022 assessed tobacco use at enrollment and 8.3% did so during follow-up. About 20.8% used at least one C-TUQ question, highlighting that tobacco use assessment is not yet fully incorporated into oncology clinical trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf071\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf071","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

烟草使用会对癌症治疗结果产生不利影响,但常规评估尚未完全纳入肿瘤临床试验。2012年,美国国家癌症研究所(NCI)积极累积试验中的烟草使用率评估方法:使用标准化编码工具评估144项(截至2022年12月)NCI国家临床试验网络(NCTN)积极累积试验的方案和表格。结果:144项试验中,49.3%评估了入组时的烟草使用情况(43.8%评估了卷烟,14.8%评估了电子烟)。结论:几乎一半的累积试验没有测量任何烟草使用情况,使用C-TUQ的试验更少。与2012年相比,入组和随访时的烟草使用评估增加了约70%,这是一项改善,但仍有进一步加强的空间。标准化的烟草使用信息提高了研究者估计癌症治疗效果的能力,提供公平的戒烟支持,并准确理解烟草使用对治疗结果的影响。启示:2012年,很少(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tobacco Assessment in Actively Accruing National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Network Trials.

Introduction: Tobacco use can adversely affect cancer treatment outcomes, yet routine assessment has not been fully incorporated into oncology clinical trials. In 2012, rates of tobacco use assessment in actively accruing National Cancer Institute (NCI) trials were <30% at enrollment and <5% during follow-up, prompting efforts by the NCI and major oncology associations to promote and standardize tobacco assessment in oncology research and practice (including development of the Cancer Patient Tobacco Use Questionnaire [C-TUQ]). This study was conducted to re-examine assessment patterns in 2022 (including utilization of the C-TUQ) and evaluate progress.

Methods: Protocols and forms from 144 actively accruing (as of December 2022) NCI National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) trials were evaluated using a standardized coding instrument.

Results: Of 144 trials, 49.3% assessed tobacco use at enrollment (43.8% measured cigarettes, 14.8% e-cigarettes, and <12.5% other tobacco products). Approximately 20.8% used at least one C-TUQ question, but only 3.5% used all four core items. Few measured secondhand smoke exposure (3.5%) or quit interest (2.8%). At follow-up, 8.3% assessed any form of tobacco use. Assessment rates were higher in smoking-related cancer trials.

Conclusion: Almost half of accruing trials did not measure any tobacco use and fewer used the C-TUQ. There was a >70% increase in tobacco use assessment at enrollment and follow-up compared to 2012, an improvement with room for further enhancement. Standardized tobacco use information enhances investigators' ability to estimate cancer treatment efficacy, offer equitable cessation support, and accurately understand the impact of tobacco use on treatment outcomes.

Implications: In 2012, few (<30%) cancer clinical trials evaluated tobacco use at enrollment and <5% did so during follow-up, prompting efforts to promote and standardize tobacco assessment in oncology research and practice (including development of the Cancer Patient Tobacco Use Questionnaire [C-TUQ]). The present study builds on this foundational paper and finds an overall increase in tobacco use assessment with room for improvement: 49.3% of trials in 2022 assessed tobacco use at enrollment and 8.3% did so during follow-up. About 20.8% used at least one C-TUQ question, highlighting that tobacco use assessment is not yet fully incorporated into oncology clinical trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信