一种仪器轮的验证方案:与双滚轮轮辋轮椅测力仪的比较。

IF 2.3 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Safiya Noury, Arnaud Hays, Nolwenn Poquerusse, Opale Vigié, Lorian Honnorat, Ilona Alberca, Mathieu Deves, Justin Regnaud, Arnaud Faupin
{"title":"一种仪器轮的验证方案:与双滚轮轮辋轮椅测力仪的比较。","authors":"Safiya Noury, Arnaud Hays, Nolwenn Poquerusse, Opale Vigié, Lorian Honnorat, Ilona Alberca, Mathieu Deves, Justin Regnaud, Arnaud Faupin","doi":"10.3390/mps8020025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Measuring the propulsion performance of sport wheelchairs in ecological conditions remains complex due to variations inherent in real-world practice. This study aims to develop a validation protocol for an instrumented wheel designed to measure propulsion power under ecological conditions. The wheel's precision was compared to that of the Lode Esseda roller ergometer, the gold standard for measuring the force exerted on both the left and right hands. Tests were conducted at three speeds (1, 2, and 3 m/s) on a multisport wheelchair. Results show a strong correlation between the two systems, confirmed by a repeated measures ANOVA test (<i>p</i> > 0.05) and a root mean square error (RMSE < 5%). Bland-Altman plots reveal good agreement despite discrepancies observed at high speeds, potentially due to mechanical limits. The proposed protocol validates the instrumented wheel and highlights the importance of multi-speed evaluation to ensure valid measurements in ecological conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":18715,"journal":{"name":"Methods and Protocols","volume":"8 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932206/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Validation Protocol for an Instrumented Wheel: A Comparison with a Dual-Roller Handrim Wheelchair Ergometer.\",\"authors\":\"Safiya Noury, Arnaud Hays, Nolwenn Poquerusse, Opale Vigié, Lorian Honnorat, Ilona Alberca, Mathieu Deves, Justin Regnaud, Arnaud Faupin\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/mps8020025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Measuring the propulsion performance of sport wheelchairs in ecological conditions remains complex due to variations inherent in real-world practice. This study aims to develop a validation protocol for an instrumented wheel designed to measure propulsion power under ecological conditions. The wheel's precision was compared to that of the Lode Esseda roller ergometer, the gold standard for measuring the force exerted on both the left and right hands. Tests were conducted at three speeds (1, 2, and 3 m/s) on a multisport wheelchair. Results show a strong correlation between the two systems, confirmed by a repeated measures ANOVA test (<i>p</i> > 0.05) and a root mean square error (RMSE < 5%). Bland-Altman plots reveal good agreement despite discrepancies observed at high speeds, potentially due to mechanical limits. The proposed protocol validates the instrumented wheel and highlights the importance of multi-speed evaluation to ensure valid measurements in ecological conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Methods and Protocols\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932206/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Methods and Protocols\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/mps8020025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods and Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/mps8020025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于现实世界实践中固有的变化,测量生态条件下运动轮椅的推进性能仍然很复杂。本研究旨在开发一种用于测量生态条件下推进功率的仪表轮的验证方案。这个轮子的精度与Lode Esseda滚轮测力仪进行了比较,后者是测量左手和右手所受力的黄金标准。在多运动轮椅上以三种速度(1、2和3米/秒)进行了测试。通过重复测量方差分析(p < 0.05)和均方根误差(RMSE < 5%)证实,两个系统之间存在很强的相关性。布兰德-奥特曼图显示了良好的一致性,尽管在高速下观察到差异,可能是由于机械限制。提出的方案验证了仪器轮,并强调了多转速评估的重要性,以确保在生态条件下测量的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Validation Protocol for an Instrumented Wheel: A Comparison with a Dual-Roller Handrim Wheelchair Ergometer.

Measuring the propulsion performance of sport wheelchairs in ecological conditions remains complex due to variations inherent in real-world practice. This study aims to develop a validation protocol for an instrumented wheel designed to measure propulsion power under ecological conditions. The wheel's precision was compared to that of the Lode Esseda roller ergometer, the gold standard for measuring the force exerted on both the left and right hands. Tests were conducted at three speeds (1, 2, and 3 m/s) on a multisport wheelchair. Results show a strong correlation between the two systems, confirmed by a repeated measures ANOVA test (p > 0.05) and a root mean square error (RMSE < 5%). Bland-Altman plots reveal good agreement despite discrepancies observed at high speeds, potentially due to mechanical limits. The proposed protocol validates the instrumented wheel and highlights the importance of multi-speed evaluation to ensure valid measurements in ecological conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Methods and Protocols
Methods and Protocols Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信