{"title":"核心稳定训练对女性压力型和压力型混合性尿失禁的疗效:一项前瞻性、随机对照研究。","authors":"Merve Dikici Yagli, Nalan Capan, Elif Tarihci Cakmak, Funda Güngör Ugurlucan, Cenk Yasa, Ayse Karan","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06115-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of core stabilization exercises combined with pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT, Kegel exercises) in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) on pelvic floor muscle strength, incontinence parameters, and quality of life scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized controlled study included 60 women diagnosed with SUI or stress-dominant mixed urinary incontinence (MUI). Participants were randomly assigned to two groups: the intervention group, which performed both core and Kegel exercises, and the control group, which engaged only in Kegel exercises. Evaluations were conducted immediately after the intervention and at the 10-week follow-up using digital palpation, perineometer, bladder diaries, pad tests, and quality of life assessments, including UDI-6, IIQ-7, ISI, and the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups demonstrated significant reductions in the frequency and severity of incontinence, as well as improvements in quality of life scores. However, while the intervention group exhibited sustained benefits at the 10th-week follow-up, improvements in the control group regressed over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The addition of core stabilization exercises to Kegel exercises did not yield significant short-term differences; however, at follow-up, the core exercise group maintained significantly better outcomes compared to the control group. These findings suggest that, in women diagnosed with SUI, core stabilization exercises enhance pelvic floor muscle strength and endurance more sustainably than Kegel exercises alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Core Stabilization Exercises in Women with Stress and Stress-Dominant Mixed Urinary Incontinence: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study.\",\"authors\":\"Merve Dikici Yagli, Nalan Capan, Elif Tarihci Cakmak, Funda Güngör Ugurlucan, Cenk Yasa, Ayse Karan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00192-025-06115-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of core stabilization exercises combined with pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT, Kegel exercises) in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) on pelvic floor muscle strength, incontinence parameters, and quality of life scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized controlled study included 60 women diagnosed with SUI or stress-dominant mixed urinary incontinence (MUI). Participants were randomly assigned to two groups: the intervention group, which performed both core and Kegel exercises, and the control group, which engaged only in Kegel exercises. Evaluations were conducted immediately after the intervention and at the 10-week follow-up using digital palpation, perineometer, bladder diaries, pad tests, and quality of life assessments, including UDI-6, IIQ-7, ISI, and the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups demonstrated significant reductions in the frequency and severity of incontinence, as well as improvements in quality of life scores. However, while the intervention group exhibited sustained benefits at the 10th-week follow-up, improvements in the control group regressed over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The addition of core stabilization exercises to Kegel exercises did not yield significant short-term differences; however, at follow-up, the core exercise group maintained significantly better outcomes compared to the control group. These findings suggest that, in women diagnosed with SUI, core stabilization exercises enhance pelvic floor muscle strength and endurance more sustainably than Kegel exercises alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Urogynecology Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Urogynecology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06115-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06115-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy of Core Stabilization Exercises in Women with Stress and Stress-Dominant Mixed Urinary Incontinence: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study.
Introduction and hypothesis: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of core stabilization exercises combined with pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT, Kegel exercises) in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) on pelvic floor muscle strength, incontinence parameters, and quality of life scores.
Methods: This prospective, randomized controlled study included 60 women diagnosed with SUI or stress-dominant mixed urinary incontinence (MUI). Participants were randomly assigned to two groups: the intervention group, which performed both core and Kegel exercises, and the control group, which engaged only in Kegel exercises. Evaluations were conducted immediately after the intervention and at the 10-week follow-up using digital palpation, perineometer, bladder diaries, pad tests, and quality of life assessments, including UDI-6, IIQ-7, ISI, and the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ).
Results: Both groups demonstrated significant reductions in the frequency and severity of incontinence, as well as improvements in quality of life scores. However, while the intervention group exhibited sustained benefits at the 10th-week follow-up, improvements in the control group regressed over time.
Conclusions: The addition of core stabilization exercises to Kegel exercises did not yield significant short-term differences; however, at follow-up, the core exercise group maintained significantly better outcomes compared to the control group. These findings suggest that, in women diagnosed with SUI, core stabilization exercises enhance pelvic floor muscle strength and endurance more sustainably than Kegel exercises alone.
期刊介绍:
The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion