导管内超声在恶性胆道狭窄患者内镜下胆道刷洗取样中的作用:一项双中心回顾性研究。

IF 2.1 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Annals of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-25 DOI:10.20524/aog.2025.0942
Jianxiang Wang, Zhuqiong Lu, Guangwen Chen, Zhenyang Shen, Junjun Wang, Jiangfeng Hu, Xinjian Wan, Hongcheng Sun, Haiming Zheng, Xiaobo Cai
{"title":"导管内超声在恶性胆道狭窄患者内镜下胆道刷洗取样中的作用:一项双中心回顾性研究。","authors":"Jianxiang Wang, Zhuqiong Lu, Guangwen Chen, Zhenyang Shen, Junjun Wang, Jiangfeng Hu, Xinjian Wan, Hongcheng Sun, Haiming Zheng, Xiaobo Cai","doi":"10.20524/aog.2025.0942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic biliary brushing is the first line modality for sampling in patients with indeterminate biliary stricture (BS); however, its sensitivity is limited. Endoscopic intraductal ultrasound (IDUS) is also a useful approach for the diagnosis of biliary malignancies. However, whether IDUS can guide the sampling by biliary brushing has not been reported.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for BS in 2 tertiary care hospitals and assessed the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of IDUS and brush cytology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study involved 530 patients with BS, including 333 in the IDUS group and 197 in the non-IDUS group. Both groups exhibited similar baseline characteristics. The diagnostic ability of IDUS imaging was as follows: sensitivity 70.7%, specificity 82.4%, PPV 81.5%, NPV 72.0%, and accuracy 76.3%. Brush cytology alone demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 45.2%, with specificity 98.2%, PPV 97.2%, NPV 56.0%, and accuracy 67.2%. The sensitivity was similar in patients with or without IDUS, whereas it was significantly higher in patients with biliary mucosal invasion indicated by IDUS (55.1% vs. 30.3%, P=0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although IDUS cannot improve the detection rate of biliary brushing for malignancy, it helps identify patients with malignant BS to be sampled more easily by brushing.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":"38 2","pages":"208-213"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11928891/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of intraductal ultrasound in endoscopic biliary brushing for sampling in patients with malignant biliary strictures: a bicentric retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Jianxiang Wang, Zhuqiong Lu, Guangwen Chen, Zhenyang Shen, Junjun Wang, Jiangfeng Hu, Xinjian Wan, Hongcheng Sun, Haiming Zheng, Xiaobo Cai\",\"doi\":\"10.20524/aog.2025.0942\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic biliary brushing is the first line modality for sampling in patients with indeterminate biliary stricture (BS); however, its sensitivity is limited. Endoscopic intraductal ultrasound (IDUS) is also a useful approach for the diagnosis of biliary malignancies. However, whether IDUS can guide the sampling by biliary brushing has not been reported.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for BS in 2 tertiary care hospitals and assessed the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of IDUS and brush cytology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study involved 530 patients with BS, including 333 in the IDUS group and 197 in the non-IDUS group. Both groups exhibited similar baseline characteristics. The diagnostic ability of IDUS imaging was as follows: sensitivity 70.7%, specificity 82.4%, PPV 81.5%, NPV 72.0%, and accuracy 76.3%. Brush cytology alone demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 45.2%, with specificity 98.2%, PPV 97.2%, NPV 56.0%, and accuracy 67.2%. The sensitivity was similar in patients with or without IDUS, whereas it was significantly higher in patients with biliary mucosal invasion indicated by IDUS (55.1% vs. 30.3%, P=0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although IDUS cannot improve the detection rate of biliary brushing for malignancy, it helps identify patients with malignant BS to be sampled more easily by brushing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"38 2\",\"pages\":\"208-213\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11928891/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2025.0942\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2025.0942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:内镜下胆道刷壁是不确定胆道狭窄(BS)患者的一线取样方式;然而,它的敏感性是有限的。内镜下导管内超声(IDUS)也是诊断胆道恶性肿瘤的有效方法。但IDUS能否指导胆道刷胆取样尚无报道。方法:回顾性分析2家三级医院行内窥镜逆行胆管造影诊断BS的患者,评估IDUS和刷细胞学检查的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和准确性。结果:本研究纳入530例BS患者,其中IDUS组333例,非IDUS组197例。两组表现出相似的基线特征。IDUS影像学诊断能力:敏感性70.7%,特异性82.4%,PPV 81.5%, NPV 72.0%,准确率76.3%。单独刷细胞学检查的总体敏感性为45.2%,特异性为98.2%,PPV为97.2%,NPV为56.0%,准确性为67.2%。有或无IDUS患者的敏感性相似,而IDUS指示胆道粘膜侵犯患者的敏感性明显更高(55.1%比30.3%,P=0.003)。结论:IDUS虽不能提高胆道刷检对恶性BS的检出率,但有助于通过刷检更容易识别恶性BS患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of intraductal ultrasound in endoscopic biliary brushing for sampling in patients with malignant biliary strictures: a bicentric retrospective study.

Background: Endoscopic biliary brushing is the first line modality for sampling in patients with indeterminate biliary stricture (BS); however, its sensitivity is limited. Endoscopic intraductal ultrasound (IDUS) is also a useful approach for the diagnosis of biliary malignancies. However, whether IDUS can guide the sampling by biliary brushing has not been reported.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for BS in 2 tertiary care hospitals and assessed the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of IDUS and brush cytology.

Results: The study involved 530 patients with BS, including 333 in the IDUS group and 197 in the non-IDUS group. Both groups exhibited similar baseline characteristics. The diagnostic ability of IDUS imaging was as follows: sensitivity 70.7%, specificity 82.4%, PPV 81.5%, NPV 72.0%, and accuracy 76.3%. Brush cytology alone demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 45.2%, with specificity 98.2%, PPV 97.2%, NPV 56.0%, and accuracy 67.2%. The sensitivity was similar in patients with or without IDUS, whereas it was significantly higher in patients with biliary mucosal invasion indicated by IDUS (55.1% vs. 30.3%, P=0.003).

Conclusion: Although IDUS cannot improve the detection rate of biliary brushing for malignancy, it helps identify patients with malignant BS to be sampled more easily by brushing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterology
Annals of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信