{"title":"导管内超声在恶性胆道狭窄患者内镜下胆道刷洗取样中的作用:一项双中心回顾性研究。","authors":"Jianxiang Wang, Zhuqiong Lu, Guangwen Chen, Zhenyang Shen, Junjun Wang, Jiangfeng Hu, Xinjian Wan, Hongcheng Sun, Haiming Zheng, Xiaobo Cai","doi":"10.20524/aog.2025.0942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic biliary brushing is the first line modality for sampling in patients with indeterminate biliary stricture (BS); however, its sensitivity is limited. Endoscopic intraductal ultrasound (IDUS) is also a useful approach for the diagnosis of biliary malignancies. However, whether IDUS can guide the sampling by biliary brushing has not been reported.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for BS in 2 tertiary care hospitals and assessed the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of IDUS and brush cytology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study involved 530 patients with BS, including 333 in the IDUS group and 197 in the non-IDUS group. Both groups exhibited similar baseline characteristics. The diagnostic ability of IDUS imaging was as follows: sensitivity 70.7%, specificity 82.4%, PPV 81.5%, NPV 72.0%, and accuracy 76.3%. Brush cytology alone demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 45.2%, with specificity 98.2%, PPV 97.2%, NPV 56.0%, and accuracy 67.2%. The sensitivity was similar in patients with or without IDUS, whereas it was significantly higher in patients with biliary mucosal invasion indicated by IDUS (55.1% vs. 30.3%, P=0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although IDUS cannot improve the detection rate of biliary brushing for malignancy, it helps identify patients with malignant BS to be sampled more easily by brushing.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":"38 2","pages":"208-213"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11928891/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of intraductal ultrasound in endoscopic biliary brushing for sampling in patients with malignant biliary strictures: a bicentric retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Jianxiang Wang, Zhuqiong Lu, Guangwen Chen, Zhenyang Shen, Junjun Wang, Jiangfeng Hu, Xinjian Wan, Hongcheng Sun, Haiming Zheng, Xiaobo Cai\",\"doi\":\"10.20524/aog.2025.0942\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic biliary brushing is the first line modality for sampling in patients with indeterminate biliary stricture (BS); however, its sensitivity is limited. Endoscopic intraductal ultrasound (IDUS) is also a useful approach for the diagnosis of biliary malignancies. However, whether IDUS can guide the sampling by biliary brushing has not been reported.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for BS in 2 tertiary care hospitals and assessed the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of IDUS and brush cytology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study involved 530 patients with BS, including 333 in the IDUS group and 197 in the non-IDUS group. Both groups exhibited similar baseline characteristics. The diagnostic ability of IDUS imaging was as follows: sensitivity 70.7%, specificity 82.4%, PPV 81.5%, NPV 72.0%, and accuracy 76.3%. Brush cytology alone demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 45.2%, with specificity 98.2%, PPV 97.2%, NPV 56.0%, and accuracy 67.2%. The sensitivity was similar in patients with or without IDUS, whereas it was significantly higher in patients with biliary mucosal invasion indicated by IDUS (55.1% vs. 30.3%, P=0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although IDUS cannot improve the detection rate of biliary brushing for malignancy, it helps identify patients with malignant BS to be sampled more easily by brushing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"38 2\",\"pages\":\"208-213\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11928891/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2025.0942\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2025.0942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The role of intraductal ultrasound in endoscopic biliary brushing for sampling in patients with malignant biliary strictures: a bicentric retrospective study.
Background: Endoscopic biliary brushing is the first line modality for sampling in patients with indeterminate biliary stricture (BS); however, its sensitivity is limited. Endoscopic intraductal ultrasound (IDUS) is also a useful approach for the diagnosis of biliary malignancies. However, whether IDUS can guide the sampling by biliary brushing has not been reported.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for BS in 2 tertiary care hospitals and assessed the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of IDUS and brush cytology.
Results: The study involved 530 patients with BS, including 333 in the IDUS group and 197 in the non-IDUS group. Both groups exhibited similar baseline characteristics. The diagnostic ability of IDUS imaging was as follows: sensitivity 70.7%, specificity 82.4%, PPV 81.5%, NPV 72.0%, and accuracy 76.3%. Brush cytology alone demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 45.2%, with specificity 98.2%, PPV 97.2%, NPV 56.0%, and accuracy 67.2%. The sensitivity was similar in patients with or without IDUS, whereas it was significantly higher in patients with biliary mucosal invasion indicated by IDUS (55.1% vs. 30.3%, P=0.003).
Conclusion: Although IDUS cannot improve the detection rate of biliary brushing for malignancy, it helps identify patients with malignant BS to be sampled more easily by brushing.